Traveling the world opens up the mind to new ways of thinking. Everyone wants to travel; they just aren’t sure about where they want to go. People can choose from thousands of places around the world; however when deciding whether to vacation in India or the United Arab Emirates(UAE), there are many factors to consider. The United Arab Emirates and India have an innumerable amount of differences; because of this, these places attract different people. For a significant number of reasons, the United Arab Emirates is a worthier place to vacation compared to India. Living standards in India and the United Arab Emirates are significantly different to each other. The United Arab Emirates has better living standards when compared to India. With a population of 1.31 billion people, India remains much more populated than the UAE; 1,300,840,000 more people live in India when compared to the UAE("United Arab Emirates vs India”). The difference in these numbers is immense. India being so populated results in “chaos and louder streets” (Brown, Poirier). This doesn’t sound like a place anyone would want to vacation. When searching for a place to vacation, most people prefer places that aren’t so crowded and polluted. Because of this, the UAE remains the best choice for a vacation spot. The UAE isn’t anywhere near as crowded and chaotic as India. Tourists can move around the country without feeling overwhelmed all the time by the amount of people around them. In addition to India being
By the beginning of the second Millennium, many countries realized the need and necessity to cope up with the rest of the rapidly developing world. As they realized this necessity, they also realized that the key to growth and development is, indeed, education. As a result, many countries around the world entered the heated race of reforming their education systems hoping that this would ensure them a foothold in the modern world.
Many things will affect people’s decision to travel, the destinations they choose and for how long they stay. Different destinations are affected by different factors, here we will explore these factors and the destinations they effect.
There had been a growing outcry from the public and leaders for something to be done to reduce the increasingly growing number of Japanese immigrants in the West Coast. Subsequent regulations placed on the Japanese in the United States made them aggravated. There was serious trouble brewing between the United States and Japan until the Japanese carried out attacks on Pearl Harbour in December 1941. After the attack on Pearl Harbor there was increased spread of propaganda from the press and local leaders against the people with Japanese roots. There were numerous calls to the Congress and President Roosevelt for removal of the Japanese from the Pacific Coast. On the 19th day of February 1942, President Roosevelt issued the Executive Order Number 9066 (Wheeler, Becker and Glover 244). The Executive Order authorized the evacuation of the Issei and Missei. About 120000 individuals of Japanese ancestry, both citizens and non-citizens were evacuated from the West Coast in what Lt. General John DeWitt said was compelled by “military necessity” (Wheeler, Becker and Glover 244). The most convincing and reliable evidence reveals that the removal and incarceration of Japanese Americans after Pearl Harbor did not meet the “clear and present danger” test. I do not agree with the Supreme Court’s decision.
The difference the United States has from other countries comes from societal and social normative. The United States foundation was built upon individualistic ideals. Given these points, The United States society upholds the American Bill or rights; it is organized around the Declaration of Independence, “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” (Barr 36). Alternatively, Canadian foundational principles were built upon collectivist concepts. The Canadian government preserves the principle of parliamentary supremacy; it is organized around “peace, order, and good government” (Barr 36). So, it is logical that after the Revolution during the cultural migration those in favor of British rule moved to the north. Conversely, those supporting the south supported newly independent colonies.
Due to Japan never wanting to surrender to the United States of America, two bombs were dropped on two cities which were Hiroshima and Nagasaki. There were many reasons why the United States decided to launch their nuclear attack. One of those reasons was that they wanted to end the war and save lives. An invasion would have cost too much and would have had a lot more people killed. Another reason was that the U.S didn’t want another war happening which was going to be Russia vs Japan. They intervened to show how dominant they were and show dominance over the two countries. The last reason that will be talked about is Pearl Harbour. The United States wanted revenge for what the Japanese had done to them. The conflict between the United
The decade before World War II saw economic depression grip the most powerful nations on the world. The United States and Japan were no exceptions to this, with one major difference. As an island nation, Japan lacked the resources and raw materials necessary to expand its military and heavy industry, a popular strategy for ending depression and stimulating economic recovery and expansion. As such, Japan turned to military conquest and imperialism to gather the necessary resources. Standing in the way was an impediment long-seen as an obstacle to the Japanese military leadership – the United States. The oil embargo enacted under President Franklin Roosevelt, preventing Japan from receiving oil exports from its largest supplier, proved to be a tipping point that coalesced military strategy around the need to bring war to the American homeland. Along with its overly-ambitious military hopes in the quest to expand an empire recovering from economic depression and in dire need of resources and raw materials, the Japanese leaders underestimated the will of the Unites States and its allies in fighting a war against their aggression. Mistaking isolationist tendencies for “softness,” the Japanese failed to consider the rallying effect Pearl Harbor would have on the American spirit, ultimately catalyzing the transformation of the United States from an isolationist power to the protector of democracy around the world.
Visitors from these countries predicted to have more than double in the coming years as well as double of their spending in travel. This is a good opportunity for Australia tourism industry to enter into the five market in order to boost the tourism in Australia. People in five of these countries are going up to middle class with the rising of spending which the growth of travel out of their countries can be foreseen. So, we will need to find out and know the demographic, psychographic, economic condition, political and environmental of these countries, as they are all different. Through the partnership of Tourism Australia and UNWTO, they hope that the related sectors are able to understand more about the five-targeted countries in Asia and gain competitive advantage through the report that has been
Like Athens and Sparta, were the United States and China drawn into a war neither power wanted because of their alliances?
After the atomic bombs had fallen and Japan was smoldering, very few people thought the” land of the rising sun” would ever rise again. However, as history can attest, they were wrong. In the wake of the 1945 bombings, the occupation and subsequent reconstruction of Japan was begun, just a short month later. The reconstruction of Japan was spearheaded by the Supreme Commander of Allied Powers, General Douglas MacArthur, and was formulated before the smoke even cleared .This reconstruction plan opened new gates to the Japanese people that were previously untapped. Additionally, the new diplomatic relations between the United States and their former enemy, Japan, following World War Two had a profound impact upon economic, defensive, and social policies of both the United States and the Japanese postwar governments. The exact nature of this impact would not be truly appreciated, however, for years to come.
The United States and Brazil have similarities nevertheless numerous dissimilarities associated with health care. First and foremost let’s get things straight, The United States is an industrialized nation that has nearly 323 million residents. Besides, it has the most significant economy globally, due to its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is around $16.77 trillion (World Bank, 2014). Alternatively, Brazil is an up-and-coming country, with more than 204 million of populaces and categorized by indigenous multiplicity that disparities wealth and advanced areas with some places that are exceedingly underprivileged. Within the last 15 years, Brazil has enhanced its economy and currently it is reflected as a stable country not only economically but also governmentally and socially. The Brazilian GDP is around $2.246 trillion, basically, more than 6 times less than The United States GDP.
Conflict over energy resources—and the wealth and power they create—has become an increasingly prominent feature for geopolitics particularly in the Middle East . The discovery of oil in the late nineteenth century added a dimension to the region as major outside states powers employed military force to protect their newly acquired interests in the Middle East. The U.S.’s efforts to secure the flow of oil have led to ever increasing involvement in the Middle East region’s political affairs and ongoing power struggles. By the end of the twentieth century, safeguarding the flow of oil from the Persian Gulf had become one of the most important functions of the U.S. military establishment. The close relationship between the United States and the Saudi royal family was formed in the final months of World War II, when U.S. leaders sought to ensure preferential access to Saudi petroleum. The U.S. link with Saudi Arabia and other countries in the region has demonstrated to be greatly beneficial to both parties, yet it has also led to ever deepening U.S. involvement in regional politics.
I have to admit that we are very blessed with so many beautiful and breathe taking cities in the world. Dubai is just one of the many countries which has advanced from their humble beginnings and today are multi million tourist. Dubai is another city which has moved from having not as much as other countries once did such as money and a stable economy, to one of the richest cities in the world. In 1966 oil was discovered in Dubai and was a catalyst for Dubai’s economic growth. From a country that had come from not having a stable economy and not a lot of money, it has become like I said earlier, one of the richest cities in the
Today, tourism has become a global phenomenon being widely recognized in both regional and national levels. In fact, tourism is considered as one of the fastest growing sectors in the world economy, thereby being viewed as a potential sector in raising tax revenues, providing employment opportunities as well as promoting economic diversity (Khizindar, 2012). Goeldner and Ritchie (2006) indicate that the significance of tourism has increased considerably through educational institutions such as universities as well as media, which are conduits of spreading the concept of tourism and hospitality .For instance, Saudi Arabia is one of those countries in the Middle East, which is determined to promote tourism for growth and sustainability despite belonging to those nations that have historically built their economies on oil and natural gas (Eid, 2012).
The United Arab Emirates is one of the most important tourist destinations in the region. The Arab spring had a very minor effect on the country’s tourism as it did not have a revolution but tourists in countries such as the Americas and Eastern Asia and some European countries were still slightly worried to visit any Arab country as it could be hit by the domino effect of the Arab Spring. UAE is not a neighboring country of any of the countries that had revolutions but it is in the same region.
Social factors do have a profound influence in the industry and the market. Industries have to evolve with the change in living standards and income level of the consumers. As per the World Bank specification, UAE is classified as a ‘High income and Mid-sized populated ' country. The local market has not grown to the required level compared to the other high income group economies, which attracts a substantial percent of expatriates to invest in the local market. High Standards of