preview

What Is Nature Vs Nurture In Frankenstein

Better Essays

Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein deeply develops the trope of nature vs. nurture. The romantic era is characterized by a desire to revert to natural animalistic living in the world. Shelley’s main characters embody nature and nurture respectively. Victor, raised in a loving home, kills with no concern and disregards his caring family. The Monster, Victor’s creation, on the other hand, is forced to live in nature like an animal with no companion. Victor is Shelley’s direct comment on the Victorian lifestyle characterized by material possession and religious moral structure. Victor embodies one who is grounded in societally constructed niceties and formalities but is corrupted by the lifestyle. The monster is shown to be the morally correct character …show more content…

In contrast, Pilar’s paganistic rituals, such as tarot cards, and her passion for morally incorrect behavior reveal her connection to the body while simultaneously exposing her disinterest in how other citizens of macondo view her. Ursula lies to herself and others to gain a respect and reverence for the Buendia name. Jose Arcadio Buendia sits tied under the chestnut tree, truly revealing the state of the Buendia family, and still “Ursula was finally able to give him a piece of news that sounded like the truth” (p.107). Ursula piece of “good” information regards the engagement of Amaranta and Pietro Crespi. This of course is merely a veneer masking Rebecca’s affront to the family’s honor wherein she leaves her own engagement to Pietro for her half brother Jose Arcadio. Rebeca’s act not only tarnishes the Buendia name, but also mocks the catholic church, that which Ursula reveres most. This moment defines Ursula’s style of mothering. As the matriarch of the Buendia family, Ursula strives for the Buendia name to be one that is respectable, powerful, and long-lasting. Ursula’s concern is not with the happiness or love that her children feel, but with what people will think. Marquez uses the word finally in the above quote to stress the obsession Ursula has with the family’s honor. Her choice to spin Rebeca’s egregious insult against the family name into a piece of good news is …show more content…

Their stances on sexuality reflect the age old, human conflict based in whether sex is an animal, and therefore human, necessity or a divine and sacred act to be controlled and regulated by religion and society. Ursula, even after she was married, “before going to bed, would put on a rudimentary kind of drawers that her mother had made out of sailcloth and has reinforced with a system of crisscrossed leather straps and that was closed in the front by a thick iron buckle” (p.21). Ursula’s sexual repression is built upon a fear of being outcast from society because her privileged lifestyle comes with the constant public eye. As the wife of the founder of Macondo, Ursula is expected to act a certain way. Ursula’s behavior is reflective of societal rules and regulations on sexual behavior. Most commonly, these restrictions are only for the upper classes. Not only does Ursula burden herself with this sexual morality, but she forces it on her children. When Pietro Crespi would visit Rebeca, “his fiance would receive him in the main parlor with doors and windows open to be safe from any suspicion” (p.74). In Ursula's home, the couple, much in love and engaged, could not sit in a room together without her watchful eye and the doors open. No human cravings or necessities are allowed under Ursula’s roof. Pilar, opposingly, does not live by the rules of society. Pilar represents the lower

Get Access