preview

What Written Knowledge Does: Three Examples Of Academic Discourse

Decent Essays

Charles Bazerman shows us four contexts in which works of knowledge and persuasion can be examined in his essay “What Written Knowledge Does: Three Examples of Academic Discourse.” These four contexts can be described as object under study, literature of the field, anticipated audience, and author’s own self. We can use Bazerman’s framework and apply it to different works, and no matter how different they are, they will fit into this framework. This framework can be used to examine and compare two different pieces, “Connecting natural landscapes using a landscape permeability model to prioritize conservation activities in the United States” by David M. Theobald, Sarah E. Reed, Kenyon Fields, and Michael Soulé and “Gender and Wilderness Conservation” by Kimberly Jarvis. In using Bazerman’s framework, we can compare the ideas and arguments made in these two essays, regardless of their relation to each other. The first of the two essays being examined, “Connecting natural landscapes using a landscape permeability model to prioritize conservation activities in the United States” by Theobald et. al discusses the issues of connectivity for different species when humans destroy their landscape and ecosystem. This essay shows us that fragmentation has decreased biodiversity, and human interaction with the …show more content…

The second essay, Kimberly Jarvis’ “Gender and Wilderness Conservation” shows how important and influential women were in the progressive era, and how women played a huge role in the conservation movement. Women are typically forgotten in the conservation movement, and they are overshadowed by men who played equally important roles during this time period. These two essays vary in content and the message they try to get across, but Bazerman’s framework can help to juxtapose

Get Access