I would like #2 & #3 answered please Background: Morris Saldov conducted a study inEastern and Central Newfoundland in 1988 to examinepublic attitudes towards social spending. In particular,the study tried to determine if knowing someone onpublic assistance (yes, no) affected one's views onsocial spending (too little, about right, too much). Thedata from the study is summarized in the table below.Too littleAbout rightToo muchTotalSource: Morris Saldov, Public Attitudes to SocialSpending in Newfoundland," Canadian Review of SocialPolicy, 26, November 1990, pages 10-14.Directions: Conduct a chi-square test for independenceto determine if the association between knowingsomeone on public assistance and views on social.spending is statistically significant.YesNoNo42 71. Choose the correct null and alternativehypotheses.O Ho: There is no association betweenknowing someone on public assistance andviews on social spending.Ha There is an association betweenknowing someone on public assistance andviews on social spending.ToolittleTotal4915 1126971666 25 91O Ho: There is an association betweenknowing someone on public assistance andviews on social spending.Ha There is no association betweenknowing someone on public assistance andviews on social spending.Aboutright2. Compute the test statistic.Complete the following table of expectedcounts. (Round your answers to 3 decimalplaces).Toomuchx² =p-value=YesCompute the value of the test statistic. (Roundyour answer to 2 decimal places.)No3. Compute the p-value. (Round your answer to 4decimal places.)4. Interpret the results of the significance test.The p-value provides strong evidenceagainst the null hypothesis. Theassociation between knowing someone onpublic assistance and attitudes towardssocial spending is statistically significant.From a practical perspective, a personwho knows someone on public assistance is2.3 times more likely to believe that toolittle is spent on social needs.

Question

I would like #2 & #3 answered please Background: Morris Saldov conducted a study inEastern and Central Newfoundland in 1988 to examinepublic attitudes towards social spending. In particular,the study tried to determine if knowing someone onpublic assistance (yes, no) affected one's views onsocial spending (too little, about right, too much). Thedata from the study is summarized in the table below.Too littleAbout rightToo muchTotalSource: Morris Saldov, Public Attitudes to SocialSpending in Newfoundland,&#34; Canadian Review of SocialPolicy, 26, November 1990, pages 10-14.Directions: Conduct a chi-square test for independenceto determine if the association between knowingsomeone on public assistance and views on social.spending is statistically significant.YesNoNo42 71. Choose the correct null and alternativehypotheses.O Ho: There is no association betweenknowing someone on public assistance andviews on social spending.Ha There is an association betweenknowing someone on public assistance andviews on social spending.ToolittleTotal4915 1126971666 25 91O Ho: There is an association betweenknowing someone on public assistance andviews on social spending.Ha There is no association betweenknowing someone on public assistance andviews on social spending.Aboutright2. Compute the test statistic.Complete the following table of expectedcounts. (Round your answers to 3 decimalplaces).Toomuchx² =p-value=YesCompute the value of the test statistic. (Roundyour answer to 2 decimal places.)No3. Compute the p-value. (Round your answer to 4decimal places.)4. Interpret the results of the significance test.The p-value provides strong evidenceagainst the null hypothesis. Theassociation between knowing someone onpublic assistance and attitudes towardssocial spending is statistically significant.From a practical perspective, a personwho knows someone on public assistance is2.3 times more likely to believe that toolittle is spent on social needs.

Accepted Answer

Degree of freedom = (Row - 1)*(Column - 1)
= (3 - 1)*(2 - 1) = 2