3. Consider the consumer optimization problem subject to max a In(x) + 3 ln(y) P₂x +Pyy ≤w. r, y> 0. (a) Write the Lagrangean for the problem noting that the non-negativity con- straint cannot bind since z, y> 0 and write the Kuhn-Tucker conditions for the problem. subject to (b) Argue that the budget constraint is binding and solve the problem. (c) Add a third good to the model so that the new problem becomes: max a ln(x + 2) + 3 ln(y +2) z.y. P₂x +Pyy + P₂² ≤w, x, y, z ≥ 0, where you can define In(0) =-∞o. Argue that if := 0 at optimum, then a > 0 and y> 0. (d) Is it possible to have at optimum z>0, y > 0, z > 0? (e) When is z = 0 at optimum?

Micro Economics For Today
10th Edition
ISBN:9781337613064
Author:Tucker, Irvin B.
Publisher:Tucker, Irvin B.
Chapter6: Consumer Choice Theory
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 3SQP
icon
Related questions
Question
Economics
3. Consider the consumer optimization problem
max a In(x) + Bln(y)
subject to
Pza + Pyy <w.
r, y > 0.
(a) Write the Lagrangean for the problem noting that the non-negativity con-
straint cannot bind since a, y > 0 and write the Kuhn-Tucker conditions for
the problem.
(b) Argue that the budget constraint is binding and solve the problem.
(c) Add a third good z to the model so that the new problem becomes:
max a In(r + 2) +3 In(y+2)
subject to
Pza + Pyy + P:z < w,
1, y, : 2 0,
where you can define In(0) = -0. Argue that if z = 0 at optimum, then r > 0
and y > 0.
(d) Is it possible to have at optimum r > 0, y > 0, z > 0?
(e) When is z = 0 at optimum?
Transcribed Image Text:Economics 3. Consider the consumer optimization problem max a In(x) + Bln(y) subject to Pza + Pyy <w. r, y > 0. (a) Write the Lagrangean for the problem noting that the non-negativity con- straint cannot bind since a, y > 0 and write the Kuhn-Tucker conditions for the problem. (b) Argue that the budget constraint is binding and solve the problem. (c) Add a third good z to the model so that the new problem becomes: max a In(r + 2) +3 In(y+2) subject to Pza + Pyy + P:z < w, 1, y, : 2 0, where you can define In(0) = -0. Argue that if z = 0 at optimum, then r > 0 and y > 0. (d) Is it possible to have at optimum r > 0, y > 0, z > 0? (e) When is z = 0 at optimum?
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 6 steps with 25 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Partial Derivatives
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Micro Economics For Today
Micro Economics For Today
Economics
ISBN:
9781337613064
Author:
Tucker, Irvin B.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Principles of Economics 2e
Principles of Economics 2e
Economics
ISBN:
9781947172364
Author:
Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher:
OpenStax
Economics For Today
Economics For Today
Economics
ISBN:
9781337613040
Author:
Tucker
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou…
Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou…
Economics
ISBN:
9781285165875
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
ECON MICRO
ECON MICRO
Economics
ISBN:
9781337000536
Author:
William A. McEachern
Publisher:
Cengage Learning