8. Which of the fllowin statements isfalse?a. Acordig to he reuls o te ooperaiv, alenaing ofr gm, plyrs agre on the quilibiumallocation of he upus in te fistround. This holds frthe 2 priod altemating ofer game justaswll asthem-period version of the same game.b. Intheinfie pro, dlemaing ofer aganin game, aplayr's aloctio shouk e iversely prporioa tohis or her iscount rate or ate of impatience.c. Thenoncoopentive gametheor aproachto argaining omplemens the coperativ aproch sine i elsusundersand the posile statagis ehind suchallocatons and soutions as iven, for cample,by the Nashbagaining rule.d. Inth ulimatum or picho-ol game,the subgame perfec quilibrumis to plit vrythin fityfiy.

Game theory refers to the study of strategic interactions between the players in which the choices…

8. Which of thefllowingsatemens is fale? a. Accordingto the esuls o he oncooperativ, alenatingofer game, player agre n the quilbrium allocation of he suplus in te fistround. This holds fr the 2 prid altemating offe game just aswll as he n-period version of the same game. b. Inthe ininite pro, lenting oferbarganing game, playr's loctio should be inesly prporioa to his or her discount rate or ate of impatience. 6. The nonopertive gaethor aroac to arganin complemens th coperatv aproac sie help us understand the posblestrtogies bhind suchallocatons and solutons as gvn, for cample,by te Nash bagaining nule. d. In the lintum or plitcho dolargam, h sugame perfect qulibrium is to plit verythin fityfiy.

8. Which of thefllowingsatemens is fale? a. Accordingto the esuls o he oncooperativ, alenatingofer game, player agre n the quilbrium allocation of he suplus in te fistround. This holds fr the 2 prid altemating offe game just aswll as he n-period version of the same game. b. Inthe ininite pro, lenting oferbarganing game, playr's loctio should be inesly prporioa to his or her discount rate or ate of impatience. 6. The nonopertive gaethor aroac to arganin complemens th coperatv aproac sie help us understand the posblestrtogies bhind suchallocatons and solutons as gvn, for cample,by te Nash bagaining nule. d. In the lintum or plitcho dolargam, h sugame perfect qulibrium is to plit verythin fityfiy.

Principles of Microeconomics

7th Edition

ISBN:9781305156050

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter22: Frontiers Of Microeconomics

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6PA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

There are 2 players. They take Ston eS From the Pilt of 6 Stones. Player 1 can takt only 2 or 3 Stones. piayer 2 can taKeS only 2 or 4 StonesS. P layers take turns, observe dil Previous moves, and player 1 mover first. A pla yer loses if She can not make a legal move, While another player ir declared the Winner. Let the pay oF OF Winning egval to 1 and the payoFF OF losing equal to 0. a) represent the in ɛxtemsive Form (depict Only legalmoes) b) Find all SPNE OF this game& explain your a mwwer. Who Will Win ? game Only legalmar)
The prisoners' dilemma is a two-person game illus·trating thata. t he cooperative outcome could be worse for bothpeople than t he Nash equilibrium.b . even if the cooperative outcome is better than theNash equilibrium for one person, it might be worsefor the other.c. even if cooperation is better than the Nash equilibrium,each person might have an incentive not tocooperate.d . rational, seff·interested individuals will naturallyavoid the Nash equilibrium because it is worse forboth of them.
1. What is the expected value of playing this game ? a. The player repeatedly rolls a six - side d die until it comes up 6. b. When the die comes up 6 , the player receives a payoff, and the game ends. The player get s precise ly one payof f. c. The initial payoff is $6, and it increases by 20%. The f irst roll payoff is $6 ; the second roll payoff is $7.20 (1.2*$6) ; the third roll payoff is $8.64 (1.2*$7.20), and so on. What is the expected value of playing this game?
3 0: she makes a pront of $9 An is ISK AVCise and aunty she makes. Let P be the probability that it rains the day of the concert. Find the number P tha makes Ann indifferent between organizing the concert in the Club or at the Park. 8. Compute the mixed strategy Nash equilibrium of the game below: Bungle F2 # Zippy E Left Right DOD F4 Up 2,-1 R I 20 F3 $ BAG 3 4 -2,0 HOT % 5 F5 Down 3,1 T 4,-2 VO MacBook Air 6 F6 Y & 7 F7 * U 8
The prisoners’ dilemma is a two-person gameillustrating thata. the cooperative outcome could be worse for bothpeople than the Nash equilibrium.b. even if the cooperative outcome is better thanthe Nash equilibrium for one person, it might beworse for the other.c. even if cooperation is better than the Nashequilibrium, each person might have an incentivenot to cooperate.d. rational, self-interested individuals will naturallyavoid the Nash equilibrium because it is worsefor both of them.
dent A boss notices that one of his unscrupulous employees has been stealing company materials lately. He values honesty in himself and his employees, but the stolen property was not valu Consequently, the boss prefers keeping her around rather than having to fire and train a repl Nevertheless, he would ideally like to stop her from stealing. The boss is thinking about issuing a warning: the next person caught stealing any company property will be immediately fired. I Should the boss issue such a warning? (Hint: You need to first find the subgame perfect equilibrium (SPE)) Below is the game in extensive form. The top payoffs belong to the Boss, the bottom payoff belong to the employee. Employee Stop No warning Steal Figure 1: Extensive form of the game Boss Ignore Boss Fire Warning Boss Follow Test Forgive 21 Employee Quit 0
ం వయడు Firms in Marçaa cost =o for Goth • FicmsAroduce Fir Twe firms 20 bertrand compotition for both diffrencided poduts, oms Sunction have the fallowing inverse denand शि= | -01- 203 pz=1-92-5 a Defue repried 6 Denve Rertrand equilbba Bertrand reaction functio) and diagremadticalde 5) madirall Deుల and equilubi gauntitier,pricer Arofits.
3. Suppose that the various Balls of basketball or internet fame Lavar, Lamelo, Liangelo, Lonzo,and Spalding are considering playing in a 1-on-1 tournament. They get a payoff of 0 if theydecide not to participate. The following table illustrates their payoffs across the variousscenarios. 1 Player 2 Players 3 Players 4 Players 5 Players Lavar 10 4 2 -2 -5 Lamelo 10 7 5 2 -1 Liangelo 10 7 5 2 -1 Lonzo 10 8 7 6 5 Spalding 10 9 8 7 6 a. Find and describe all pure strategy Nash Equilibria.b. Suppose now Spalding, since it is in fact a literal basketball, gets a payoff of 0 in anycircumstance, being an inanimate object. The table is now as follows: 1 Player 2 Players 3 Players 4Players 5 Players Lavar 10 4 2 -2 -5 Lamelo 10 7 5 2 -1 Liangelo 10 7 5 2 -1 Lonzo 10 8 7 6 5 Spalding 0 0 0 0 0 Find and describe all pure strategy Nash Equilibria.
QUESTION 4 Consider the game represented below. Laislog 1 Phlizene-and diodecons Player 1 B Player 1 CDE Player 2 F G H 2,2 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 1, -1 0, 0-1, 1-1, -1 mon am Player 2 J 3,4 K ciklas momenos lo gryt doo's yot jaleveane 4,3 A. How many pure strategies are available to each player? List them for each player. B. What is (are) the subgame-perfect Nash equilibrium (equilibria)? Explain. C. Give an example of a Nash equilibrium of this game that is not subgame-perfect. Why is this Nash equilibrium not credible? Be specific.
12. Consider a game where each player picks a number from 0 to 60. The guess that is closest to half ofthe average of the chosen numbers wins a prize. If several peopleare equally close, then they share theprize. The game theory implies that (A) all players have dominant strategies to choose 0 (B) all players have dominant strategies to choose 30 (C) there is a Nash equilibrium where all players pick 0 (D) there is a Nash equilibrium where all players pick positive numbers 13. Behavioral data in such games suggests that (A) most subjects choose 0; (B) most subjects choose 30; (C) common answers include 30, 15, 7.5, and 0; (D) most subjects use randomization. Can you help me answer number 13 please?
This is the answer.. plz write in hand written Here, the given decision tree shows that player 1 moves either to enter or not to enter, while player 2 has two options to choose that are concede and price war. When analyzing the given information, it can be seen that player 1 will surely enter the market as it will give him higher payoff than the payoff when he does not enter as does not enter gives him $1 billion, while entry will give him either $2 billion or $1.5 billion. Therefore, player 1 will enter. After the entry of player 1, player 2 has an incentive to choose to concede as it will give him the payoff of$1.5 billion, while price war will give him $1 billion. Therefore, the outcome of this game would be: (Enter, Concede)
i am not sure how to ask anther question after the expert answered one of mine but here is a question i asked the expert and the naswer he game me in picture 1 & 2. the questions insnt linked from other sites its from bartleby just coudlnt see option to ask anther. can you answer this part now: Now assume the financial advisor knows that another advisor will offer a competitive portfolio. Based on historical data, he knows this competitive portfolio’s total return follows a normal distribution with mean £36mil and standard deviation of £2mil and is priced at 5% of total return. Clients will naturally choose the advisor which offers the portfolio with the highest net How does the distribution of profit over the range of financial prices considered in part B) changes, when the competitor is considered?