Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Math
Statistics
Assessing whether there is a plausible causal mechanism that could explain a correlation... A is not necessary when we find a correlation in a population that had a < .05 probability of happening by chance, since we can reject the "mere chance" hypothesis regardless of how implausible the causal mechanism is. B D is important because unless we find a correlation in a population that had a < .05 probability of happening by chance, we can reject the "mere chance" hypothesis if the causal mechanism is sufficiently implausible. is important because even when we find a correlation in a population that had a < .05 probability of happening by chance, whether we should reject the "mere chance" hypothesis can depend on the plausibility of the causal mechanism. Your answer is not necessary, but when the mechanism is sufficiently plau we should never reject the cau hypothesis regardless of whet. Done

Assessing whether there is a plausible causal mechanism that could explain a correlation... A is not necessary when we find a correlation in a population that had a < .05 probability of happening by chance, since we can reject the "mere chance" hypothesis regardless of how implausible the causal mechanism is. B D is important because unless we find a correlation in a population that had a < .05 probability of happening by chance, we can reject the "mere chance" hypothesis if the causal mechanism is sufficiently implausible. is important because even when we find a correlation in a population that had a < .05 probability of happening by chance, whether we should reject the "mere chance" hypothesis can depend on the plausibility of the causal mechanism. Your answer is not necessary, but when the mechanism is sufficiently plau we should never reject the cau hypothesis regardless of whet. Done

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
Question 7.10 Answered Assessing whether there is a plausible causal mechanism that could explain a correlation... A is not necessary when we find a correlation in a population that had a < .05 probability of happening by chance, since we can reject the "mere chance" hypothesis regardless of how implausible the causal mechanism is. B D is important because unless we find a correlation in a population that had a < .05 probability of happening by chance, we can reject the "mere chance" hypothesis if the causal mechanism is sufficiently implausible. is important because even when we find a correlation in a population that had a < .05 probability of happening by chance, whether we should reject the "mere chance" hypothesis can depend on the plausibility of the causal mechanism. Your answer is not necessary, but when the mechanism is sufficiently plau we should never reject the cau hypothesis regardless of whet. Done
Transcribed Image Text:Question 7.10 Answered Assessing whether there is a plausible causal mechanism that could explain a correlation... A is not necessary when we find a correlation in a population that had a < .05 probability of happening by chance, since we can reject the "mere chance" hypothesis regardless of how implausible the causal mechanism is. B D is important because unless we find a correlation in a population that had a < .05 probability of happening by chance, we can reject the "mere chance" hypothesis if the causal mechanism is sufficiently implausible. is important because even when we find a correlation in a population that had a < .05 probability of happening by chance, whether we should reject the "mere chance" hypothesis can depend on the plausibility of the causal mechanism. Your answer is not necessary, but when the mechanism is sufficiently plau we should never reject the cau hypothesis regardless of whet. Done
Assessing whether there is a plausible causal mechanism that could explain a correlation... A)() Question 7.10 Answered Assessing whether there is a plausible causal mechanism that could explain a correlation... is not necessary when we find a correlation in a population that had a < .05 probability of happening by chance, since we can reject the "mere chance" hypothesis regardless of how implausible the causal mechanism is. is important because unless we find a correlation in a population that had a < B.05 probability of happening by chance, we can reject the "mere chance" hypothesis if the causal mechanism is sufficiently implausible. is important because even when we find a correlation in a population that had a < .05 probability of happening by chance, whether we should reject the "mere chance" hypothesis can depend on the plausibility of the causal mechanism. Your answer is not necessary, but when the mechanism is sufficiently plau D we should never reject the cal Done hvioothesis reaardless of whet. Question 7.10 Answered Assessing whether there is a plausible causal mechanism that could explain a correlation... A is not necessary when we find a correlation in a population that had a < .05 probability of happening by chance, since we can reject the "mere chance" hypothesis regardless of how implausible the causal mechanism is. B is important because unless we find a correlation in a population that had a < .05 probability of happening by chance, we can reject the "mere chance" hypothesis if the causal mechanism is sufficiently implausible. ☑
Transcribed Image Text:Assessing whether there is a plausible causal mechanism that could explain a correlation... A)() Question 7.10 Answered Assessing whether there is a plausible causal mechanism that could explain a correlation... is not necessary when we find a correlation in a population that had a < .05 probability of happening by chance, since we can reject the "mere chance" hypothesis regardless of how implausible the causal mechanism is. is important because unless we find a correlation in a population that had a < B.05 probability of happening by chance, we can reject the "mere chance" hypothesis if the causal mechanism is sufficiently implausible. is important because even when we find a correlation in a population that had a < .05 probability of happening by chance, whether we should reject the "mere chance" hypothesis can depend on the plausibility of the causal mechanism. Your answer is not necessary, but when the mechanism is sufficiently plau D we should never reject the cal Done hvioothesis reaardless of whet. Question 7.10 Answered Assessing whether there is a plausible causal mechanism that could explain a correlation... A is not necessary when we find a correlation in a population that had a < .05 probability of happening by chance, since we can reject the "mere chance" hypothesis regardless of how implausible the causal mechanism is. B is important because unless we find a correlation in a population that had a < .05 probability of happening by chance, we can reject the "mere chance" hypothesis if the causal mechanism is sufficiently implausible. ☑
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS