Choose a wrong statement about uniformly mixed fund pollutants. The damage caused by uniformly mixed pollutants is relatively insensitive to where the emissions are injected into the atmosphere. A difficulty with emission charge is determining how high the charge should be set in order to ensure that the resulting emission reduction is at the desired level. The policy can focus simply on controlling the total amount of emissions in a manner that minimizes the cost of control. The cost-effective allocation is found by equating the total control costs of the two sources.

Choose a wrong statement about uniformly mixed fund pollutants. The damage caused by uniformly mixed pollutants is relatively insensitive to where the emissions are injected into the atmosphere. A difficulty with emission charge is determining how high the charge should be set in order to ensure that the resulting emission reduction is at the desired level. The policy can focus simply on controlling the total amount of emissions in a manner that minimizes the cost of control. The cost-effective allocation is found by equating the total control costs of the two sources.

Principles of Economics 2e

2nd Edition

ISBN:9781947172364

Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Publisher:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Chapter12: Environmental Protection And Negative Externalities

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5SCQ: Consider two approaches to reducing emissions of CO2 into the environment from manufacturing...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider two approaches to reducing emissions of CO2 into the environment from manufacturing industries in the United States. In the first approach, the U.S. government makes it a policy to use only predetermined technologies. In the second approach, the U.S. government determines which technologies are cleaner and subsidizes their use. Of the two approaches, which is the command-and-control policy?
How can high-income countries benefit from covering much of the cost of reducing pollution created by low-income countries?
What is a pollution charge and what incentive does it provide for a firm to take external costs into account?
Is zero pollution an optimal goal? Way or why not?
Submit All Which statement is TRUE with regards to the use of tradable permits for controlling carbon emissions? The total amount of pollution would rise above the established cap if permit prices were set too high. Environmental groups that purchase tradable permits and do not use them will push the price of remaining permits lower. O Firms with lower costs of pollution abatement will demand more tradable permits. O Advancements in abatement technology will lead to a decline in the price of tradable permits. Activate Windows Go to Settings to activate Windos Q市市市公e電后利口 11/ HDM LAPTOP LOGIN HIGH DEFINITION MULTIMEDIA INT acer USERNAME: student RASSIA OD
We would optimally institute command-and-control policies if a pollutant was O highly damaging. O minimally damaging. O beneficial for all parties. O damaging in high quantities only.
What advantages and disadvantages do you see in using acap-and-trade system to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?What pros and cons do you see in using carbon taxes toachieve this goal? What do you think of the idea of a revenueneutralcarbon tax? If you were a U.S. senator, what type ofpolicy would you support in order to address emissions in theUnited States, and why?
There are two factories in a small town. Both of them emit carbon dioxide into the air. Their current monthly emissions, as well as their total costs for reducing emissions in 20-ton increments, are listed in the tables below. Factory 1 Current emissions (tons/month) 120 Total cost of reducing emissions by 20 tons/month $50 Total cost of reducing emissions by 40 tons/month Total cost of reducing emissions by 60 tons/month Total cost of reducing emissions by 80 tons/month Total cost of reducing emissions by 100 tons/month $150 $270 $410 $570 Factory 2 Current emissions (tons/month) 160 Total cost of reducing emissions by 20 tons/month $20 Total cost of reducing emissions by 40 tons/month $60 Total cost of reducing emissions by 60 tons/month $110 Total cost of reducing emissions by 80 tons/month $200 Total cost of reducing emissions by 100 tons/month $300
мсо 46 If the units of output purchased in a competitive market generate positive externality benefits, we can infer that the competitive equilibrium outcome is such that: A the market price is equal to marginal social benefit B marginal private cost is greater than the market price C I do not want to answer this question. D marginal private cost is greater than marginal private benefit E marginal private cost is less than marginal social benefit F marginal private benefit is greater than marginal social benefit
Computer models of global climate changecaused by increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere predictnot only higher overall temperatures, but also more intense andfrequent heat waves. During the devastating European heatwave in the summer of 2003, between 35,000 and 52,000“excess deaths” occurred. Before taking specific actions toreduce carbon dioxide emissions, economists and politicians tryto estimate the costs. Should excess deaths be included as acost of inaction? If so, what value should we place on a life?
Econ Return to Activity Score Mentor Mega Beans Market Booming Berries Booming Berries Materials Mark, if the external marginal cost from Booming Berries is $20 per thousand pounds, what is the socially efficient price per pound? 130 Booming Berrles 120 Clare 110 100 $70 90 80 70 Mark 60 That is correct! 50 40 30 Econ 20 Mentor 10 Mark, if the external marginal cost from Booming Berries is $20 per thousand pounds, what is the socially efficient quantity (in thousands)? 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Quantity (in thousands) Clare Enter a response then click Submit below (in thousands) Submit MacBook Air F12 FI1 F9 F10 F8 F7 F6 888 F4 F5 F3 F2 esc F1 * & 24 % 8 @ # 7 3 4 2 T E Q tab Price (per pound)
8. Preblems and Applications QB Suppose that the government decides to issue trachble permits for a certain form of pollution. In terms of economic efficiency in the market for pothition, having the governmerk ayction the permits off is detributing them to firmi. True or Falsen If the government chostes to divtribute the permits, the alocation of permits among firms does not matter for efficiency, but is would affect the distribuen of wealth True False