Consider data on heights of husbands and wives for a sample of 199 married couples in the UK collected by the Great Britain Office of Population Census and Surveys.[1] The scatter plot below shows wife height plotted against husband height and the least-squares regression line is shown in red. The equation of the regression line is: WÊin = 40.49 +0.33H Hin where WHin is the wife's height and HHin is the husband's height. Both are measured in inches. 7 65 Wife's Height (inches) 60 55 60 65 70 Husband's Height (inches) 75 Now consider a new variable for husband height measured in centimeters called HHcm. Because there are 2.54 cm per inch, this variable is defined as HHcm = 2.54* HHin. Suppose we use the exact same sample, but instead estimate a regression line with husband height in centimeters while wife height is still measured in inches: WHin = a + bHHcm What is the value of a in the new regressio line equation? (round to 2 decimal places)
Consider data on heights of husbands and wives for a sample of 199 married couples in the UK collected by the Great Britain Office of Population Census and Surveys.[1] The scatter plot below shows wife height plotted against husband height and the least-squares regression line is shown in red. The equation of the regression line is: WÊin = 40.49 +0.33H Hin where WHin is the wife's height and HHin is the husband's height. Both are measured in inches. 7 65 Wife's Height (inches) 60 55 60 65 70 Husband's Height (inches) 75 Now consider a new variable for husband height measured in centimeters called HHcm. Because there are 2.54 cm per inch, this variable is defined as HHcm = 2.54* HHin. Suppose we use the exact same sample, but instead estimate a regression line with husband height in centimeters while wife height is still measured in inches: WHin = a + bHHcm What is the value of a in the new regressio line equation? (round to 2 decimal places)
Chapter3: Polynomial Functions
Section3.5: Mathematical Modeling And Variation
Problem 2ECP
Related questions
Question
![Consider data on heights of husbands and wives for a sample of 199 married couples in the UK
collected by the Great Britain Office of Population Census and Surveys.[1] The scatter plot below
shows wife height plotted against husband height and the least-squares regression line is shown in
red. The equation of the regression line is:
WÊin = 40.49 +0.33H Hin
where W Hin is the wife's height and HHin is the husband's height. Both are measured in
inches.
ta
65
Wife's Height (inches)
60
55
60
65
70
Husband's Height (inches)
-
75
Now consider a new variable for husband height measured in centimeters called HHcm. Because
there are 2.54 cm per inch, this variable is defined as HHcm = 2.54* HHin. Suppose we use
the exact same sample, but instead estimate a regression line with husband height in centimeters
while wife height is still measured in inches:
WHin = a + bHHcm
What is the value of a in the new regression
line equation? (round to 2 decimal places)](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2F3f08d3cb-03f2-44ac-afec-90ed33ecc605%2Faf07a984-9322-4c27-a71b-a01a5c81eb49%2Fch7ad9l_processed.png&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:Consider data on heights of husbands and wives for a sample of 199 married couples in the UK
collected by the Great Britain Office of Population Census and Surveys.[1] The scatter plot below
shows wife height plotted against husband height and the least-squares regression line is shown in
red. The equation of the regression line is:
WÊin = 40.49 +0.33H Hin
where W Hin is the wife's height and HHin is the husband's height. Both are measured in
inches.
ta
65
Wife's Height (inches)
60
55
60
65
70
Husband's Height (inches)
-
75
Now consider a new variable for husband height measured in centimeters called HHcm. Because
there are 2.54 cm per inch, this variable is defined as HHcm = 2.54* HHin. Suppose we use
the exact same sample, but instead estimate a regression line with husband height in centimeters
while wife height is still measured in inches:
WHin = a + bHHcm
What is the value of a in the new regression
line equation? (round to 2 decimal places)
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
Recommended textbooks for you
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus
ISBN:
9780321964038
Author:
GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:
Pearson Addison Wesley,
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus
ISBN:
9780321964038
Author:
GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:
Pearson Addison Wesley,
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
Functions and Change: A Modeling Approach to Coll…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781337111348
Author:
Bruce Crauder, Benny Evans, Alan Noell
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781680331141
Author:
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Publisher:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt