Consider two consumers (1; 2), each with income M to allocate between two goods. Good 1 provides 1 unit of consumption to its purchaser and units of consumption to the other consumer. Each consumer i, i = 1; 2, has the utility function is consumption of good 1 and is consumption of good 2. a. Provide an interpretation of α. b. Suppose that good 2 is a private good. Find the Nash equilibrium levels of consumption when both goods have a price of 1. c. By maximizing the sum of utilities, show that the equilibrium is Pareto-ancient if α = 0 but incident for all other values of α. d. Now suppose that good 2 also provides 1 unit of consumption to its purchaser and a, 0 ≤ α ≤ 1, units of consumption to the other consumer. For the same preferences, find the Nash equilibrium and show that it is ancient for all values of α. e. Explain the conclusion in part d.

Consider two consumers (1; 2), each with income M to allocate between two goods. Good 1 provides 1 unit of consumption to its purchaser and units of consumption to the other consumer. Each consumer i, i = 1; 2, has the utility function is consumption of good 1 and is consumption of good 2. a. Provide an interpretation of α. b. Suppose that good 2 is a private good. Find the Nash equilibrium levels of consumption when both goods have a price of 1. c. By maximizing the sum of utilities, show that the equilibrium is Pareto-ancient if α = 0 but incident for all other values of α. d. Now suppose that good 2 also provides 1 unit of consumption to its purchaser and a, 0 ≤ α ≤ 1, units of consumption to the other consumer. For the same preferences, find the Nash equilibrium and show that it is ancient for all values of α. e. Explain the conclusion in part d.

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter8: Game Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8.7P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

There are two firms, whose production activity consumes some of the clean air that surrounds our planet. The total amount of clean air is K > 0, and any consumption of clean air comes out of this common resource. If firm i ∈ {1, 2} uses ki of clean air for its production, the remaining amount of clean air is K − k1 − k2. Each player derives utility from using ki for production and from the remainder of clean air. The payoff of firm i is given by ui(ki , kj ) = ln(ki) + ln(K − ki − kj ) j ≠ i ∈ {1, 2}. (a) Assuming that each firm chooses ki ∈ (0, K), to maximize its payoff function, derive the players’ best response functions and find a Nash equilibrium. (b) Is the equilibrium you found in (a) unique or not? What are equilibrium payoffs?
Suppose that two individuals, Jon and David, form a community and would like to construct a communal fort that would protect them from attacks. They consume both good X, a private good, and the protection from the fort, P. One unit of good X costs 1 unit while one unit of P costs 2 units, so the budget constraint for each is given by: Xi + 2Pi = 100. Both Jon and David have an income of 100 and a utility function of the form: U = log(Xi) + 2log(Pj + Pd) (a) How much protection, P, will be privately provided? What is optimal consumption of X, the private good? (b) What are the socially optimal amounts of protection, P, and consumption, X, of the private good? How do the socially optimal amounts compare to that privately provided? Explain why.
A husband and wife would produce incomes Yh and Yw in their fallback situations. The utility each derives in any circumstance is just equal to his or her consumption expenditure in that circumstance. In their fallback situations, their consumption expenditure levels are just equal to their incomes. Thus their fallback levels of utility are Yh and Yw. If they cooperate, they produce Z>Yh + Yw. They engage in Nash cooperative bargaining to determine how to allocate Z across the consumption of the husband, Ch, and consumption of the wife, Cw, subject to the budget constraint that Ch + Cw = Z. Under any bargained allocation, the two would derive utilities of Ch and Cw. a) The surplus associated with cooperation is S = Z − Yh − Yw. Show that each spouse consumes his or her fallback income plus half the surplus in the Nash cooperative bargaining solution. Please do fast ASAP fast please.
A husband and wife would produce incomes Yh and Yw in their fallback situations. The utility each derives in any circumstance is just equal to his or her consumption expenditure in that circumstance. In their fallback situations, their consumption expenditure levels are just equal to their incomes. Thus their fallback levels of utility are Yh and Yw. If they cooperate, they produce Z>Yh + Yw. They engage in Nash cooperative bargaining to determine how to allocate Z across the consumption of the husband, Ch, and consumption of the wife, Cw, subject to the budget constraint that Ch + Cw = Z. Under any bargained allocation, the two would derive utilities of Ch and Cw. What do Ch and Cw equal if Yh = Yw (but this quantity is not equal to zero)? Please do fast ASAP fast
Suppose that two individuals, Jon and David, form a community and would like to construct a communal fort that would protect them from attacks. They both consume good X, a private good, and the protection of the fort, P. One unit of good X costs 1 unit of currency, and one unit of P costs 2 units of currency. Both Jon and David have an income of 100 and a utility function of the form: U = log(Xi) + 2 × log(PJ + PD)The budget constraint for each is given by:Xi + 2 × Pi = 100 (a) Find the amount of protection Jon will provide as a function of how much David provides, and explain why the relationship is the way it is.
Consider the following simplified bargaining game. Players 1 and 2 have preferences over two goods, x and y. Player 1 is endowed with one unit of good x and none of good y, while Player 2 is endowed with one unit of y and none of good x. Player i has utility function: min{xi, yi} where xi is i's consumption of x and yi his consumption of y. The "bargaining" works as follows. Each player simultaneously hands any (nonnegative) quantity of the good he possesses (up to his entire endowment) to the other player. (a) Write this as a game in normal form. (b) Find all pure strategy equilibria of this game. (c) Does this game have a dominant strategy equilibrium? If so, what is it? If not, why not? Please show all work. Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.
For this and a and b problems, consider a partial equilibrium model with two households with preferences given by u1(x1, m1) = 2 ln (x1 + 1/6) + m1 and u2(x2, m2) = 3 ln(x2+1/3)+m2, and two firms with cost functions for the production of good 1 given by c1(y1) = y 2 1 and c2(y2) = y 2 2 Find the demand function for good 1 of each household and the market demand function for good 1, and illustrate each household demand and the market demand curves in a graphic. a. Find the supply function for good 1 of each firm and the market supply function for good 1, and illustrate each firm supply and the market supply curves in a graphic. b. Find the competitive equilibrium price for good 1, as well as the equilibrium demand of each household, the equilibrium supply for each firm, the households’ utility in equilibrium, the firms’ equilibrium profits, the consumer surplus, the producer surplus, and the total surplus.
Bluth’s preferences for paper and houses can be expressed as Ub(p, h) = 2pb + hb, while Scott’s preferences can be expressed as Us(p, h) = ps + 2bs. Bluth begins with no paper and 10 houses, whereas Scott begins with 10 units of paper and no houses. 1. Is the starting endowment Pareto efficient? Justify your answer using an Edgeworth box? Determine whether each of the following price pairs is consistent with a competitive equilibrium. If yes, determine the resulting allocation of goods, sketching that equi- librium in your Edgeworth box. If not, explain why not (for what good is there a shortage, for what good is there a surplus?) pp =$3 and ph =$1 along with pp =$1 and ph =$1 Assume that the price of houses is $1. Given that price, determine the highest price pp that is consistent with a competitive equilibrium.
Two neighboring homeowners, i = 1,2, simultaneously choose how many hours to spend maintaining a lawn. The AVERAGE benefit per hour for i is (e.g., it is for homeowner 1) And the (opportunity) cost per hour for each homeowner is 4. (a) Give each homeowner’s (net) payoff as a function of and . (b) Compute the Nash equilibrium.
Consider a first-price sealed bid auction of a single object with two bidders j = 1,2 and no reservation price. Bidder 1′s valuation is v1 = 2, and bidder 2′s valuation is Consider the following auction. Two buyers (i = 1,2) have valuations uni- formly distributed over [0,1]. The good is assigned to the highest bid, but the winner pays the average of his bid and the losing bid. Use the revenue equivalence principle to derive the optimal strategies in a symmetric equilibrium. Assume that the optimal bid is a linear function of the buyer’s valuation: b(vi) = cvi where c is a real number.In the event of a tie, the object is awarded by a flip of a fair coin
Some collector has a painting that he no longer values. However, there are two buyers that would be happy to acquire it. Buyer 1 assigns a value of $900 to the painting, and buyer 2 of $1,000. Explain that this situation can be represented as a cooperative game with transferable utility. Obtain the set of players and write down the characteristic function (supposing that the grand coalition’s value is $1000). Find the Core and the Shapley value of the game.
Consider a two-person exchange economy in which initial endowments for both individuals are such that (e1 = e1) = (1,1). Suppose the two individuals have the following indirect utility functions: V1 (x, y) = ln M1 - a ln Px - (1-a) ln Py V2 (x, y) = ln M2 -b ln Px - (1-b) ln Py Where Mi is the income level of person i and Px and Py are the prices for goods x and goods y, respectively. a) Calculate the market clearing prices.