$4.00 Marginal Cost (per ton) of pollution reductionton $3.00 $2.00 $1.00 O a). $1.10 Ob). $0.90 Figure 1 O c). $0.60 25% Od). either (b) or (c) above 50% 75% mc plant 1 Assume now that each plant in Figure 1 normally emits 100 tons of pollutant (so a 50% reduction means a reduction of 50 tons.). Assume the plants are issued permits for 50 tons of pollutant. Plant 2 might agree to sell one permit to Plant 1 (and Plant 1 would agree to pay) a price of... mc plant 2 100% Pollution reduction.

$4.00 Marginal Cost (per ton) of pollution reductionton $3.00 $2.00 $1.00 O a). $1.10 Ob). $0.90 Figure 1 O c). $0.60 25% Od). either (b) or (c) above 50% 75% mc plant 1 Assume now that each plant in Figure 1 normally emits 100 tons of pollutant (so a 50% reduction means a reduction of 50 tons.). Assume the plants are issued permits for 50 tons of pollutant. Plant 2 might agree to sell one permit to Plant 1 (and Plant 1 would agree to pay) a price of... mc plant 2 100% Pollution reduction.

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

5th Edition

ISBN:9781337106665

Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Chapter20: The Problem Of Adverse Selection Moral Hazard

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3MC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A firm has a marginal emissions benefit of 100-0.5*E in each of 2 years, where E measures emissions in tons. The marginal cost of emissions to society is 75/ton. The discount rate is 10% and the marginal cost of emissions also grows at 10% per year. The government decides to give the firm permits to emit 50 tons of emissions per year, but allows the firm to "bank" or "borrow" permits across the two years so that this effectively acts as a 100 ton cap on emissions over 2 years. How much will the firm emit in each year? If all firms are identical to the one you analyze here, is the government issuing too many or too few emission permits relative to the efficient level? How do you know?
The Al-Habsi family owns a big farm in Rustaq. Three choices exist for how to use the farm: i Grow garlic, where garlic yield wouid be 70.bags per acre. The price of garlic is RO 3.5 per bag and production costs are RO140.per acre (Pxa) - pnduhun =( 1.5 X70)-140= 105 RO- rwenue ii. Grow cucumber, where cucumber yield would be S0 bags per acre. The price of cucumber is RO 2,5.per bag and production costs are RO150 per (2.5xs0) - 150, -25RO loves acre iii. Lease/rent out the acres to Mr. Al-Kindi (a neighbor) who will pay RO 80 per acre. With the lease/rent option the Al-Habsi family would still have expenses of RO 35.per acre. Based on the information above, answer the following questions: 80-15- 45Ror tue O Which alternative should the Habsi family undertake? Why? Q. Given your answer above, what is the Habsi's opportunity cost per acre? (Ed What is the total economic cost pèr acre for your answer?
Given problem: The ore of a gold mine in the Mountain Province contains, on average, 0.5 grams of gold per ton. One method of processing costs $1,650 per ton and recovers 93% of the gold, while another method costs only $1,500 per ton and recovers 81% of the gold. If gold can be sold at $8,500 per gram, which method is better, and by how much? Consider the income and cost per ton of ore. Solve for the net receipt of each method. *Round off answer in 2 decimal places. Thank you
How much carbon dioxide would you prevent from entering the atmosphere in one year if you replace a 100 w light bulb with a CFL light bulb that uses 30 watts and they fix your that you have on 8 hours per day round the answer to the hundredth place. Your friend uses 5.5 gallons of gas each month mowing his lawn approximately how much CO2 pollution does it cause per month. How much does it create per year. Assuming he mows 6 months per year.
A large sewer system will cost P180,000 annually. There will be favorable consequence to the general public of P520,000 annually, and adverse consequence to a small segment of the public of P60,000 annually. What is the excess of benefits over cost?
Barry and Steve are both age 61. Barry has just purchased a whole life insurance policy. Steve purchased a whole life insurance policy one year ago. Both Barry and Steve are subject to the following 3-year select and ultimate table: 42] l[x]+1 l[x]+2 lx+3 10,000 9,600 8,640 7,771 63 61 8,654 8,135 6,996 5,737 64 62 7,119 6,549 5,501 4,016 65 63 5,760 4,954 3,765 2,410 66 I 60 x+3 The force of mortality is constant over each year of age. Calculate the difference in the probability of survival to age 64.5 between Barry and Steve.
A large sewer system will cost P180,000 annually. There will be favorable consequence to the general public of P520,000 annually, and adverse consequence to a small segment of the public of P60,000 annually. What is the excess of benefits over cost? Answer:
The table shows data on the quantities of compact discs and music videos sold. Quantity of CDs sold Quantity of music videos sold Year (millions per year) 2004 775 33 2006 625 23 2008 375 13 Draw three points that represent the data in the table. Draw a curve through the points. (1 Help me solve this Animation Get more help -
With tradable emissions permits, the price of the permit is determined by: a) the supply of and demand for permits. b) environmental protection organizations. c) the World Trade Organization. O d) the government. Note:- Please avoid using ChatGPT and refrain from providing handwritten solutions; otherwise, I will definitely give a downvote. Also, be mindful of plagiarism. Answer completely and accurate answer. Rest assured, you will receive an upvote if the answer is accurate.
The marginal benefit of being able to emit a ton of sulphur dioxide emissions for twofirms are given by:MB_X = 320 – ( Ex / 3 )MB_Y = 500 – ( Ey / 2 )Note that these marginal benefit figures can be interpreted as marginal cost of abatingemission down to levels Ex and Ey.Government regulators want to reduce total sulfur dioxide emissions to a total of 1200tons.a) If the government imposes the same standard of 600 tons maximum emissions onboth firms what would be the total cost of abatement (calculated as the aggregatedmarginal benefits forgone)?b) If the government distributed 600 tradable pollution permits to each firm whatwould be the final allocation of these permits after the firms trade them? Whatwould be the total cost of abatement in this latter case?
1. Refer to the table below. Emissions (tons/month) 10 6. Marginal Abatement Cost 15 30 7 50 70 100 120 150 3 185 230 290 1 01 a) The firm faces an emissions charge of $100 per ton/month. If the fim chooses to emit 0 tons/month what is the firm's total cost? b) The firm faces an emissions charge of $100 per ton/month. At what level of emissions does the firm minimize total abatement cost? c) The firm faces an emissions charge of $100 per ton/month. What is the firm's total cost with optimal choice? d) If the firm faced an emissions charge of $150 per ton/month, at what level of emissions does the firm minimize total abatement cost? e) If a regulatory agency simply mandated that the firm could emit a maximum of 5 tons/month and there were no emission charges, what would be the firm's total cost? f) If the firm faced an abatement subsidy of $100 per ton/month, what level of emissions would a firm choose? g) If the firm faced an abatement subsidy of$100 per ton/month, what would be the…
3. In a waterflooded mature oil field, a large scale polymer-flooding project is evaluated with a small-scale pilot-test being considered to make a decision. Without the pilot test, the existing waterflooding will continue with an estimated NPV of $36 MM USD. Historically, polymer-flooding pilot tests resulted with promising results in 65% of the cases, and results are representative for large-scale flooding in 70% of the cases (can be considered as right data are collected). • In the case of a promising pilot-test, large scale project will have an NPV of $80 MM, but if the pilot test is not representative (is wrong), this will result in a loss of $40 MM USD. • In the case of a not-promising pilot-test, existing waterflood will continue as it is, with an NPV of $36 MM USD. Calculate the value-of-information of the pilot test, by considering Lohrenz's Method.