"If the firm's ROE is too low, the firm's debt ratio must be too low." True or false?Select one:O a. TrueO b. False

Return on equity (ROE) is measured as lucre divided by shareholders' equity. once a corporation…

Answered: "If the firm's ROE is too low, the…

Intermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course List)

13th Edition

ISBN:9781337395083

Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. Daves

Publisher:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. Daves

Chapter11: Determining The Cost Of Capital

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Which statement is most correct? * A. Since debt financing raises the firm’s financial risk, increasing debt ratio will increase WACC. B. Since debt financing is cheaper than equity financing, increasing debt ratio will reduce WACC. C. Increasing a firm’s debt ratio will typically reduce the marginal costs of both debt and equity financing; however, it still may raise the firm’s WACC. D. Statements a and c are correct. E. None of the above
3.If the interest rate on debt is lower than ROA, then a firm will __________ by increasing the useof debt in the capital structure.a. increase the ROE b. not change the ROE c. decrease the ROEd. change the ROE in an indeterminable manner e. none of the above
True or false?:1. From a creditor's point of view, the higher the total debt to total assets ratio, the lower the risk that the company may be unable to pay its obligations.
Identify the correct statement: O II EBIT Is expected to be below the indifference point, the firm will prefer the capital structure with more debt O The EBIT-EPS indifference point is the point at which EBIT is the same under two different capital structures O The EBIT-EPS indifference point is always higher for an existing firm compared to a new firm O If EBIT is expected to be above the indifference point the firm will prefer the capital structure with more debt
How would each of the following scenarios affect a firm’s cost of debt, kd(1 – T); its cost of equity ke and its WACC? Indicate with a plus sign (+), a minus (-) or a zero if the factor would raise, would lower or would have indeterminate effect on the item in question. Assume for each answer that other things are held constant even though in some instances this would probably not be true. Be prepared to justify your answer but recognize that several of the parts have no single correct answer.
Which of the following is true regarding a company assuming more debt? Select one: a. Assuming more debt is always bad for the company b. Assuming more debt reduces leverage c. Assuming more debt can be good for the company as long as they earn a return in excess of the rate charged on the borrowed funds d. Assuming more debt is always good for the company
How would each of the following scenarios affect a firm's cost of debt, ra(1-T); its cost of equity, s; and its WACC? Indicate with a plus (+), a minus (-), or a zero (0) whether the factor would raise, lower, or have an indeterminate effect on the item in question. Assume for each answer that other things are held constant, even though in some instances this would probably not be true. Be prepared to justify your answer but recognize that several of the parts have no single correct answer. These questions are designed to stimulate thought and discussion. Probable Effect on ra(1-T) WACC rs a. The corporate tax rate is lowered. b. The Federal Reserve tightens credit. c. The firm uses me debt; that is, it increases its debt ratio. The dividend payout ratio is increased The firm doubles the amount of capital it raises during the year. е. The firm expands into a risky new area. f. The firm merges with another firm whose earnings g. are countercyclical both to those of the first firm and to…
Which one of the following is minimized when the value of the firm is maximized? A- WACC B- Return on equity C-Debt D-Taxes E- Bankruptcy costs
Is it better to finance a company thru debt or thru equity? Why? What are the downside and upside to each?
Which of the following is a valid reason for a firm not to use as much debt as it can raise? Group of answer choices The use of more debt is expected to result in an increase in the firmʹs cost of capital when everything is considered More debt will increase the firmʹs riskiness All of them are valid reasons for a firm to use less debt than might be available The use of more debt is expected to result in a lower price/earnings ratio
According to Modigliani & Miller M Proposition II (MM Il), as a firm's debt-equity ratio decreases, what happens to the required rate of return on equity? Briefly explain including the key aspect of MM II.
(b) Assume that Modigliani-Miller Propositions 1 and 2 hold. Ex- plain carefully why the conclusion of each of the following argu- ments is incorrect: (i) As a firm borrows more and debt becomes risky, both share- holder and bondholders demand higher rates of return. Thus, by reducing its debt ratio, a firm can reduce both the cost of debt and the cost of equity. (ii) As leverage increases, the ratio of the market value of a firm's equity to income (after debt interest) increases.

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Intermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course…

Finance

ISBN:

9781337395083

Author:

Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. Daves

Publisher:

Cengage Learning