In Emile, Rousseau claims: woman is specially made for man's delight. If man in his turn ought to be pleasing in her eyes, the necessity is less urgent, his virtue is in his strength, he pleases because he is strong. I grant you this is not the law of love, but it is the law of nature, which is older than love itself. If woman is made to please and to be in subjection to man, she ought to make herself pleasing in his eyes and not provoke him to anger (4) What does Rousseau mean here, and how does it relate to his views of heterosexuality in other assigned passages by him?

icon
Related questions
Question
readings: Holder, "The Bote"; Smith, "Foolish Man Blues"; Rainey, "Prove It on Me Blues", all in pdf on course website; Rule, ”Straights, Come Out”; Hamilton, "The Impossibility of its Being Discerned" both in course kit; Jeanette Winterson, Oranges are Not the Only Fruit (Vintage 2014 edition--note: this is a change from the orginally announced publisher); & Michel Tremblay, Hosanna (Talonbooks)
In Emile, Rousseau claims:
woman is specially made for
man's delight. If man in his
turn ought to be pleasing in
her eyes, the necessity is
less urgent, his virtue is in
his strength, he pleases
because he is strong. I grant
you this is not the law of
love, but it is the law of
nature, which is older than
love itself.
If woman is made to please
and to be in subjection to
man, she ought to make
herself pleasing in his eyes
and not provoke him to
anger (4)
What does Rousseau mean here,
and how does it relate to his
views of heterosexuality in
other assigned passages by him?
Transcribed Image Text:In Emile, Rousseau claims: woman is specially made for man's delight. If man in his turn ought to be pleasing in her eyes, the necessity is less urgent, his virtue is in his strength, he pleases because he is strong. I grant you this is not the law of love, but it is the law of nature, which is older than love itself. If woman is made to please and to be in subjection to man, she ought to make herself pleasing in his eyes and not provoke him to anger (4) What does Rousseau mean here, and how does it relate to his views of heterosexuality in other assigned passages by him?
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer