owing in styles after controlled hand-pollinations in which the two species served as pollen donor (A is blue, B is red) or pollen recipient (A on the left, B on the right). The number of pollen tubes growing in styles of species A was significantly greater than the number growing in styles of species B. However, there was no significant difference in the number of pollen tubes observed in either species based on the identity of the pollen donor. Similarly, there was no significant difference between species in the effect of pollen donor identity on the number of pollen tubes observed (i.e., no significant pollen recipient x pollen donor interaction). Do these data support the hypothesis that the two species maintain their boundaries via a difference in pollen tube growth? Why or why not? 35 30 10 Species A (pollen door Species (pollen donor Species (pollen recipient) 8

Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)
11th Edition
ISBN:9780134580999
Author:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn
Publisher:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn
Chapter1: The Human Body: An Orientation
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ: The correct sequence of levels forming the structural hierarchy is A. (a) organ, organ system,...
icon
Related questions
icon
Concept explainers
Question
The accompanying figure shows hypothetical data for an experimental test of reproductive isolation between species A and B. The data show the number of pollen tubes observed growing in
styles after controlled hand-pollinations in which the two species served as pollen donor (A is blue, B is red) or pollen recipient (A on the left, B on the right). The number of pollen tubes
growing in styles of species A was significantly greater than the number growing in styles of species B. However, there was no significant difference in the number of pollen tubes observed in
either species based on the identity of the pollen donor. Similarly, there was no significant difference between species in the effect of pollen donor identity on the number of pollen tubes
observed (i.e., no significant pollen recipient x pollen donor interaction). Do these data support the hypothesis that the two species maintain their boundaries via a difference in pollen tube
growth? Why or why not?
Pollen tubes
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
A
Species A (pollen donor)
Species B (pollen donor)
Species (pollen recipient)
B
Transcribed Image Text:The accompanying figure shows hypothetical data for an experimental test of reproductive isolation between species A and B. The data show the number of pollen tubes observed growing in styles after controlled hand-pollinations in which the two species served as pollen donor (A is blue, B is red) or pollen recipient (A on the left, B on the right). The number of pollen tubes growing in styles of species A was significantly greater than the number growing in styles of species B. However, there was no significant difference in the number of pollen tubes observed in either species based on the identity of the pollen donor. Similarly, there was no significant difference between species in the effect of pollen donor identity on the number of pollen tubes observed (i.e., no significant pollen recipient x pollen donor interaction). Do these data support the hypothesis that the two species maintain their boundaries via a difference in pollen tube growth? Why or why not? Pollen tubes 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 A Species A (pollen donor) Species B (pollen donor) Species (pollen recipient) B
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Evolutionary genetics
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, biology and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)
Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)
Biology
ISBN:
9780134580999
Author:
Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn
Publisher:
PEARSON
Biology 2e
Biology 2e
Biology
ISBN:
9781947172517
Author:
Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann Clark
Publisher:
OpenStax
Anatomy & Physiology
Anatomy & Physiology
Biology
ISBN:
9781259398629
Author:
McKinley, Michael P., O'loughlin, Valerie Dean, Bidle, Theresa Stouter
Publisher:
Mcgraw Hill Education,
Molecular Biology of the Cell (Sixth Edition)
Molecular Biology of the Cell (Sixth Edition)
Biology
ISBN:
9780815344322
Author:
Bruce Alberts, Alexander D. Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter Walter
Publisher:
W. W. Norton & Company
Laboratory Manual For Human Anatomy & Physiology
Laboratory Manual For Human Anatomy & Physiology
Biology
ISBN:
9781260159363
Author:
Martin, Terry R., Prentice-craver, Cynthia
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.
Inquiry Into Life (16th Edition)
Inquiry Into Life (16th Edition)
Biology
ISBN:
9781260231700
Author:
Sylvia S. Mader, Michael Windelspecht
Publisher:
McGraw Hill Education