Question 2 What do the findings of the World Economic Forum study show? O Reducing gender inequality enhances economic growth. O Reducing gender inequality prevents economic growth. O Reducing gender equality sometimes enhances and sometimes prevents economic growth. Gender inequality and economic growth are unrelated.

Question 2 What do the findings of the World Economic Forum study show? O Reducing gender inequality enhances economic growth. O Reducing gender inequality prevents economic growth. O Reducing gender equality sometimes enhances and sometimes prevents economic growth. Gender inequality and economic growth are unrelated.

Principles of Economics 2e

2nd Edition

ISBN:9781947172364

Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Publisher:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Chapter20: Economic Growth

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4SCQ: Assume there are two countries: South Korea and the United States. South Korea grows at 4 and the...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The GDP at Q101 is 250600 and the GDP at Q102 is 260700. What is the total GDP growth between Q101 and Q102? Select one: O a. 4% O b.2.9% O C8.27% O d. None O e. 6.15%
In the year 2014, the world's average per capita GDP was $14,517. What percent of the world's population lived in a country with per capita GDP that was below $14,517? O 21% 43% 56% OOOO 73% Show Transcribed Text Roughly what percent of the world's population live in countries with per capita GDP lower than the average world per capita GDP? 75% 50% © 25% C 10%
The Human Development Index measures O A. living standards across various countries. O B. the amount of ethnic welfare and disease in third-world countries. O C. how fairly income is distributed across countries. O D. the relative lifespan and education in third-world countries. The correlation between this index and real income per capita in a country is O A. the correlation between this index and real income per capita is weakly negative. B. countries with higher real income per capita tend to have higher levels of this index. C. no discernable association exists between this index and income per capita. D. a positive association is apparent but only for high-income economies.
What does the positive and statistically significant correlation suggest about real income per capita as a measure of welfare? O A. Since correlation does not mean causality, real income per capita should not be used to measure welfare O B. Real income per capita is a reliablethough not perfect-indicator of human welfare within and across countries. O C. Correlation is a statistical quirk and suggests nothing about the use of real income per capita as a measure of welfare O D. Real income per capita can be trusted to give unquestionable assessments of human welfare within and across countries
Why dues productivity growth in high-income economies not slow down as it runs into diminishing returns from additional investments in physical capital and human capital? Does this show one area where the theory of diminishing returns fails to apply? Why or why not?
Year 1991 1997 Nominal GDP 425 550 Real GDP O a. none of the choices O b. 125% O c. 0.77% O d. 29.4% O e. 1.294% 400 GDP Deflator (1981=100) 130 137.5 Using the table above, what is the growth rate of nominal GDP between 1991 and 1997?
A small county wants to increase its real GDP from $18,000 to $36,000. If they want this to happen in 5 years, what rate of growth do they need to have each year? O 14% O There is not enough information to answer this question. 7.78% O 5.5% O 17.5%
006.25.0 - MC - MANK08 D Over the last century, U.S. real GDP per person grew at a rate of about a. 2 percent per year, so that it is now 2 times as high as it was a century ago. Ob. 2 percent per year, so that it is now 8 times as high as it was a century ago. O c. 4 percent per year, so that it is now 2 times as high as it was a century ago. d. 4 percent per year, so that it is now 8 times as high as it was a century ago. D
Consider the economies of Tralfamadore and Sporon, both of which produce agricultural products using only land and labour. The following tables show the supply of land, population size, and real GDP for these two economies from 2020 to 2023. Complete the last column of the following two tables by calculating real GDP per capita for the two economies. Tralfamadore Land Real GDP (Dollars) Real GDP per Capita (Dollars) Year (Hectares) Population 2020 20,000 500 4,500 2021 20,000 1,000 10,000 2022 20,000 1,500 16,500 2023 20,000 2,000 24,000 Sporon Land Real GDP Real GDP per Capita (Dollars) Year (Hectares) Population (Dollars) 2020 20,000 1,000 15,000 2021 20,000 2,000 28,000 2022 20,000 3,000 36,000 2023 20,000 4,000 40,000 Rapid population growth tends to threaten economic growth in economies with higher or lower land-labour ratios.
12. The rule of 72 says that if something is growing by X% per period then it will double approximately every 72/X periods. The periods could be days, months, years, etc. In late February 2020 about 7,000 people outside of China had been infected with the COVID-19 virus and the number was increasing by 9% per day. If the growth rate stayed the same then how many times would be the number of infections double in the next 64 days? a. 8 times so about 56,000 people would be infected b. 1.125 times so about 15,000 people would be infected c. 1.125 times so about 8,000 people would be infected d. 8 times so about 1.8 million people would be infected
Assume there are two countries: South Korea and the United States. South Korea grows at 4 and the United States grows at 1. For the sake of simplicity, assume they both start from the same fictional income level, 10,000. What will the incomes of the United States and South Korea he in 20 years? By how many multiples will each countrys income grow in 20 years?
D Question 14 Suppose for the country of Joshua-land, the annual inflation rate is 7%, the population growth is 5% per year while GDP increases by 2% per year. How long would it take for the country to double its GDP? O 7 years O 14 years 35 years O Never Question 15 For the previous question, how long would it take Joshua-land to double its GDP capita? per O 7 years O 14 years O 35 years Never Question 16 For Joshua land, how long would it take for prices to double? O 7 years O 10 years 35 years O Not enough information