READ CAREFULLY You are to pick two out of the seven political philosophers we have discussed in class, and explain regarding one of them why you most favor how this philosopher has laid out his way of seeing the world, and how he explained how best to organize society and government. Then regarding the second political philosopher, explain why you most disfavor how this philosopher has laid out his way of seeing the world, and how he explained how best to organize society and government. Consider how they both viewed human nature and the equal/unequal nature of humans, and how that helps explain their world view. The length of your response for each philosopher should be 1-2 pages, double spaced with one inch margin all around. If you quote someone, be sure to reference the quote, and everything else should be written in your own words. Here is the list of political philosophers we have discussed in class: Plato, Aristotle, Machiavelli, Hobbes, Locke, Marx and Nietzsche I

READ CAREFULLY You are to pick two out of the seven political philosophers we have discussed in class, and explain regarding one of them why you most favor how this philosopher has laid out his way of seeing the world, and how he explained how best to organize society and government. Then regarding the second political philosopher, explain why you most disfavor how this philosopher has laid out his way of seeing the world, and how he explained how best to organize society and government. Consider how they both viewed human nature and the equal/unequal nature of humans, and how that helps explain their world view. The length of your response for each philosopher should be 1-2 pages, double spaced with one inch margin all around. If you quote someone, be sure to reference the quote, and everything else should be written in your own words. Here is the list of political philosophers we have discussed in class: Plato, Aristotle, Machiavelli, Hobbes, Locke, Marx and Nietzsche I

Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Course List)

7th Edition

ISBN:9781285165875

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter22: Frontiers Of Microeconomics

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6PA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Imagine a scenic canyon, visited by many local people as well as tourists from beyondthe local area. Consider a scenario in which a mining company has proposed to the localauthority that it be closed to the public and put into the production of coal. Thinking interms of economics as a way of adjudicating the relative value of one use of the canyon overthe other, what would you need to know in order to make a comparison or assessment?What kinds of quantitative data would inform your decision, and where might they comefrom? What kinds of things might you need to know that are hard to measure? Once youhave listed the kinds of information and data that might be available to inform this decision, do you think it would be sufficient to making this decision, why or why not?
7:32 AM 0.1KB/s O 63 expert.chegg.com/expei Chegg Home Expert Q&A My answers Time remaining: 00:09:22 Economics Aristotle made a key distinction between what he called 'natural' and 'un-natural' exchange. For this assignment, answer the following two questions in a page or so. 1. What is 'un-natural' exchange and why was Aristotle so worried about it? 2. How did the feudal system, via 'Canon law', manage economic and market activity?
Four roommates are planning to spend the weekendin their dorm room watching old movies, and theyare debating how many to watch. Here is theirwillingness to pay for each film:Dwayne Javier Salman ChrisFirst film $7 $5 $3 $2Second film 6 4 2 1Third film 5 3 1 0Fourth film 4 2 0 0Fifth film 3 1 0 0a. Within the dorm room, is the showing of a moviea public good? Why or why not?b. If it costs $8 to stream a movie, how many moviesshould the roommates stream to maximize totalsurplus?c. If they choose the optimal number from part (b)and then split the cost of streaming the moviesequally, how much surplus does each personobtain from watching the movies?d. Is there any way to split the cost to ensure thateveryone benefits? What practical problems doesthis solution raise?e. Suppose they agree in advance to choose theefficient number and to split the cost of the moviesequally. When Dwayne is asked his willingness topay, will he have an incentive to tell the truth? Ifso, why? If not, what will he…
Five roommates arc planning to spend the weekendin their dorm room watching movies, and they arcdebating how many movies to watch. Here is theirwillingness to pay:Quentin Spike Ridley Martin StevenFirst film $14 $10 $8 $4 $2Second film 12 8 4 2 0Third film 10 6 2 0 0Fourth film 6 2 0 0 0Filth film 2 0 0 0 0Buying a DVD costs SIS, which the roommates splitequally, so each pays $3 per movie.a. What is the efficient number of movies to watch(that is, the number that maximizes total surplus)?b. from the standpoint of each roommate, what isthe preferred number of movies?c. What is the preference of the median roommate?d. (f the roommates held a vote on the efficient out~come versus the median voter's preference, howwould each person vote? Which outcome wouldg~ a majority?c. lf one of the roommates proposed a differentnumber of movies, could his proposal beat thewinner from part (d) in a vote?f. Can majority rule be counted on to reach efficientoutcomes in the provision of public go<Xis?
Five roommates are planning to spend the weekendin their apartment watching movies, and they aredebating how many movies to watch. The tablebelow shows each roommate’s willingness to pay foreach of the movies:Ava Ridley Spike Kathryn QuentinFirst film $14 $10 $8 $4 $2Second film 12 8 4 2 0Third film 10 6 2 0 0Fourth film 6 2 0 0 0Fifth film 2 0 0 0 0A movie on their streaming service costs $15, which theroommates split equally, so each pays $3 per movie.a. What is the efficient number of movies to watch(that is, the number that maximizes total surplus)?b. For each roommate, what is the preferred numberof movies to watch?
Crne er det n ( a on se i na tom se u te se u prirod se i ne a se do OcBaffincheloctine s tumbes
Review the numbers for Canada and Venezuelafrom Table 33.12 which describes how many barrelsof oil and tons of lumber the workers can produce. Usethese numbers to answer the rest of this question.a. Draw a production possibilities frontier for eachcountry. Assume there are 100 workers in eachcountry. Canadians and Venezuelans desire bothoil and lumber. Canadians want at least 2,000tons of lumber. Mark a point on their productionpossibilities where they can get at least 3,000tons.b. Assume that the Canadians specializecompletely because they figured out they havea comparative advantage in lumber. They arewilling to give up 1,000 tons of lumber. Howmuch oil should they ask for in return for thislumber to be as well off as they were with notrade? How much should they ask for if theywant to gain from trading with Venezuela? Note:We can think of this “ask” as the relative price ortrade price of lumber.c. Is the Canadian “ask” you identified in (b) alsobeneficial for Venezuelans? Use the…
In 2006, the Australian Government incorporated research into corporate social responsibilities to determineif there is a need to include social and environmental responsibilities within the Corporation Act throughamendment procedure. It was decided not to incorporate a particular regulation through legislation, insteadrely upon the 'market forces' to encourage companies to do the 'right thing'. This viewpoint was expressedthat if companies did not look after the environment or did not act in a socially responsible manner, peoplewould not want to consume the organisations' products. From the equity market perspective, potentialinvestors would not want to invest in the organisations, and further workers wouldn't want to work for them,and so forth. Because companies were aware of such market forces, they would do the 'right thing' even inthe absence of legislation.Requirement:1) Using theories such as Public Interest Theory, Capture Theory and Economic Interest Group Theoryto critically…
'think about the goods and scrvia,s provided by yourlocal govenuncnta. Using the classification in Figure 1, exp la.in wruchcategory each of the following goods falls into:• police protection• snow plo,-.ring• education• rural roads• city streetsb. Why do you think the government provides itemsthat a,e not public goods?
Wendy Be Help ell me what you want to do ー t ▼ 스▼tt ▼ TNorm allTNo Spac Heading 1 Heading 2 Title Subtitle Subtle Em Emphasis Intense E Paragraph Styles the opportunity cost of any decision that you make involves giving up something. I would like you to evaluate your opportunity cost of taking this course at Kean University. What opportunities may be afforded to you after you have completed your educational endeavor at KU? What will you have to give up now to accomplish your short and long-term goals? Being a full time online student
What is scarcity? Can you think of two causes of scarcity?
The world in which we live is complex and to understand it, human beings make use of some orother simplification process. A theory can accordingly be seen as an attempt to simplify things.Such an observation may come as a surprise to those who have often heard remarks to the effectthat such and such a theory is difficult, or at the least terribly complicated. We should neverthelessremind ourselves that a theory involves an attempt to simplify things – it is the world out there thatis the complicated entity. A particular theory (or model) is merely trying to reduce it to manageableproportions, at least as far as understanding our environment is concerned.”In economics, theory is presented in a simple form by making the…1.23a) Post hoc assumptionb) Fallacy of compositionc) Ceteris paribus assumptiond) Blinkered approach