Suppose actual real GDP is $13.37 trillion, potential real GDP is $12.33 trillion, and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.62. If we ignore price effects, by how many trillions of dollars should the government change its spending to fix the gap? (Round this to two digits after the decimal and enter this value as either a positive value or a negative value without the dollar sign.)

Suppose actual real GDP is $13.37 trillion, potential real GDP is $12.33 trillion, and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.62. If we ignore price effects, by how many trillions of dollars should the government change its spending to fix the gap? (Round this to two digits after the decimal and enter this value as either a positive value or a negative value without the dollar sign.)

MACROECONOMICS

14th Edition

ISBN:9781337794985

Author:Baumol

Publisher:Baumol

Chapter9: Demand-side Equilibrium: Unemployment Or Inflation?

Section9.A: The Simple Algebra Of Income Determination And The Multiplier

Problem 4TY

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The following graph shows an increase in aggregate demand (AD) in a hypothetical country. Specifically, aggregate demand shifts to the right from AD1 to AD2, causing the quantity of output demanded to rise at all price levels. For example, at a price level of 140, output is now $400 billion, where previously it was $300 billion. 170 160 150 140 - 130 AD2 120 110 AD, 100 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 OUTPUT (Billions of dollars) The following table lists several determinants of aggregate demand. Complete the table by indicating the change in each determinant necessary to increase aggregate demand. Change Needed to Increase AD Wealth Taxes Interest rates The value of the domestic currency relative to the foreign currency PRICE LEVEL
a) About Country A, what is your estimate of the country's marginal propensity to consume (MPC) based on the following information on its GDP (Y) and the components thereof (in billion dollars) for two past years? Show calculation. Year 1 Year 2 c) GDP C I 11200 8000 2200 12000 8500 2400 G 800 880 The next few parts are about Country B, whose government plans to cut taxes by $24 billion as a measure to fight the current recession. The marginal propensity to consume (MPC) in Country B is known to be 34. There will be no crowding-out effect. e) NX 200 220 b) What is the initial effect (in billion dollars) of the tax cut on Country B's aggregate demand? (The "initial effect" here refers to the effect on AD after only the first round of increased spending.) What is the total effect of the tax cut on aggregate demand? Explain why it is different from the initial effect. d) How does the total effect of this $24 billion tax cut compare to the total effect of a $24 billion increase in…
Due to an increase in consumer wealth, there is a $40 billion autonomous increase in consumer spending in the economies of Westlandia and Eastlandia. Assuming that the aggregate price level is constant, the interest rate is fixed in both countries, and there are no taxes and no foreign trade, complete the accompanying tables to show the various rounds of increased spending that will occur in both economies if the marginal propensity to consume is 0.5 in Westlandia and 0.75 in Eastlandia. What do your results indicate about the relationship between the size of the marginal propensity to consume and the multiplier?
Evaluate the following statement: Even if the prices of a large number of goods and services in the economy increase dramatically, the real GDP for the economy can still fall.
The following graph shows the aggregate demand (AD) curve in a hypothetical economy. At point A, the price level is 140, and the quantity of output demanded is $300 billion. Moving down along the aggregate demand curve from point A to point B, the price level falls to 120, and the quantity of output demanded rises to $500 billion. 170 100 180 140 130 120 110 AD 100 00 100 200 300 400 B00 700 OUTPUT (Billians of dollars) As the price level falls, the cost of borrowing money will , causing the quantity of output demanded to Additionally, as the price level falls, the impact on the domestic interest rate will cause the real value of the dollar to in foreign exchange markets. The number of domestic products purchased by foreigners (exports) will therefore and the number of foreign products purchased by domestic consumers and firms (imports) will Net exports will therefore causing the quantity of domestic output demanded to
The following graph shows a decrease in aggregate demand (AD) in a hypothetical country. Specifically, aggregate demand shifts to the left from AD1AD1 to AD2AD2, causing the quantity of output demanded to fall at all price levels. For example, at a price level of 140, output is now $200 billion, where previously it was $300 billion. The following table lists several determinants of aggregate demand. Complete the table by indicating the change in each determinant necessary to decrease aggregate demand. Change needed to decrease AD Wealth (increase/ decrease) Taxes (increase/ decrease) Expected rate of return on investment (increase/ decrease) Incomes in other countries (increase/ decrease)
Suppose actual real GDP is $13.56 trillion, potential real GDP is $12.34 trillion, and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.74. If we ignore price effects, and if the government already decided to increase its spending by $1.90 trillion, by how many trillions of dollars should the government change its lump sum taxes to fix the gap? (Round this to two digits after the decimal and enter this value as either a positive value or a negative value without the dollar sign.)
Suppose actual real GDP is $13.74 trillion, potential real GDP is $12.69 trillion, and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.6. If we ignore price effects, and if the government already decided to increase its spending by $1.61 trillion, by how many trillions of dollars should the government change its lump sum taxes to fix the gap? (Round this to two digits after the decimal and enter this value as either a positive value or a negative value without the dollar sign.) Correct Answer: 3.38 Please solve to get that same answer
Suppose actual real GDP is $9.06 trillion, potential real GDP is $6.42 trillion, and the marginal propensity to consume is 0.59. If we ignore price effects, by how many trillions of dollars should the government change its lump sum taxes to fix the gap? (Round this to two digits after the decimal and enter this value as either a positive value or a negative value without the dollar sign.)
C = 450 + 0.4Y I = 350G = 150X = 70Z = 35 + 0.1Y T = 0.15YYf = 1550Calculate the tax revenue to the government of this country when the economy (2) remains in equilibrium.Calculate what the new equilibrium income should be if the government of this (6) country decides to cancel all taxes, implying the tax rate would now be 0%.Before the government decreased the tax rate, how much of government spending was required to bring the economy to full employment?
Consider two hypothetical economies that are perfectly similar except for their marginal propensity to consume (MPC). Each economy is currently in equilibrium with real income and planned expenditure equal to $100 billion, as given by the black points (plus signs) on the following two graphs. Assume that both economies are closed to trade, and that neither economy has taxes that change with income. The graphs also plot the 45-degree line. The first economy has an MPC equal to 0.5. Therefore, its initial planned expenditure line has a slope of 0.5 and passes through the point (100, 100). The second economy has an MPC equal to 0.75. Therefore, its initial planned expenditure line has a slope of 0.75 and passes through the point (100, 100). Now, suppose there is an increase of $20 billion in planned investment in each economy. In the first economy (with MPC = 0.5), the $20 billion increase in planned investment causes equilibrium income to increase by billion. In the second…
The graph below is associated with a hypothetical country. Consider a decrease in aggregate demand (AD). Specifically, aggregate demand shifts to the left from AD to AD₂, causing the quantity of output demanded to fall at each price level. For instance, at a price level of 140, output is now $200 billion, where initially it was $300 billion. PRICE LEVEL 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 8 90 0 100 AD₁ AD₂ 200 300 400 500 600 OUTPUT (Billions of dollars): 700 800 ?