i need the answer quickly Required informationSuppose Mobile Inc. and Horizon, two large mobile service providers, are each considering whether to raise or lower their ad spending the payoffs to each company depend upon the company's own choice as wellas the choice of the other company, as summarized in the payoff matrix below. Both companies are aware of the payoffs they each will receive for every combination of choices, but each must decide independentlywhat to do. What are Horizon's possible strategies in this game?Raise ad spendingHorizonLeave ad spending the sameMultiple ChoiceRaise ad spending1 million for eachMobile Inc.1.25 million for Horizon2 million for Mobile Inc.Leave ad spending the same2 million for Horizon0.5 million for Mobile Inc.1.5 million for eachLeave ad spending the same if Mobile Inc. raises ad spending.OEam 1 million, 1.25 million, 1.5 million or 2 millionRaise ad spending if Mobile Inc. leaves ad spending the same4

There are two players : Horizon & Mobile Inc.Strategy set of Horizon = Strategy Set of Mobile…

Suppose Mobile Inc. and Honzon, two large mobile service providers, are each considering whether to raise or lower their ad spending. The payoffs to each company depend upon the company's own choice s the choice of the other company, as summarized in the payoff matrix below. Both companies are aware of the payoffs they each will receive for every combination of choices, but each must decide indepen what to do. What are Horizon's possible strategies in this game? Raise ad spending 1 million for each Raise ad spending Mobile Inc. Leave ad spending the same 2 million for Horizon 0.5 million for Mobile Inc.

Suppose Mobile Inc. and Honzon, two large mobile service providers, are each considering whether to raise or lower their ad spending. The payoffs to each company depend upon the company's own choice s the choice of the other company, as summarized in the payoff matrix below. Both companies are aware of the payoffs they each will receive for every combination of choices, but each must decide indepen what to do. What are Horizon's possible strategies in this game? Raise ad spending 1 million for each Raise ad spending Mobile Inc. Leave ad spending the same 2 million for Horizon 0.5 million for Mobile Inc.

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter8: Game Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8.7P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

You are playing a game with a friend. It’s yourmove but you don’t have a dominant strategy.Your payoff depends on what your friend doesafter your move. You consider flipping a coin todecide what to do. You are about to reach for acoin, but then you realize that your friend has adominant strategy. Explain how using backwardinduction (rather than a coin toss) will now determine your next move
2. Paul and Stella play a game with three strategies each, T, M, and B for Paul, and L, C, and R for Stella. Both move simultaneously. The payoffs are given by the following form: Stella L с R Paul T (8,4) (10, 2) (2,3) M (4,2) (10, 1) (5,7) B (1,4) (10, 3) (9,-4) a. Which strategy is dominated? b. What is the pure-strategy Nash equilibrium? Identify all if there are more than one. c. If Paul moved first, so that Stella observed it, which strategy would Paul choose?
Two farmers, Ali and Hasan, graze their animals on a common land. They canchoose to use the common resource lightly or heavily and the resulting strategic interactionmay be described as a strategic form game. The payoff matrix is the following: (The table is attached on iamges part) Suppose that the game is repeated infinitely. If both players play a Grim-Trigger strategy, findthe discount factor δ such that (Light,Light) be a Nash equilibrium
The U.S. government has decided to build a new off ramp for Interstate 5 in California. Exxon and Shell are both interested in building a gas station near the new off ramp. They can build the gas station near the off ramp for northbound traffic or they could build the gas station near the off ramp for southbound traffic. The profits for each outcome are illustrated in the accompanying payoff table: Shellnorthbound Shellsouthbound Exxon northbound Exxon receives$60,000 profitShell receives$50,000 profit Exxon receives$110,000 profitShell receives$100,000 profit Exxonsouthbound Exxon receives$80,000 profitShell receives$120,000 profit Exxon receives$50,000 profitShell receives$50,000 profit a. Select the Nash equilibrium, or equilibria, that occur if Exxon and Shell make these decisions simultaneously. Exxon builds northbound and Shell builds northbound. Exxon builds southbound and Shell builds northbound. Exxon builds southbound and Shell builds southbound.…
2) There are two cola companies, Pepsi and Coke, that each own a vending machine in the dormitory. Each must decide how to stock its machine. They can fill the machine with diet soda, regular soda, or a combination of the two. The payoffs are in the strategic form of the game presented below. Соса-Cola Diet Both Classic Diet 25, 25 50, 30 50, 20 Реpsi Both 30, 50 15, 15 30, 20 Classic 20, 50 20, 30 10, 10 (a) What strategies survive iterated elimination of strictly dominated strategies? (b) What are the pure-strategy Nash equilibria?
The following table contains the possible actions and payoffs of players 1 and 2. Player 1 U M D L 2,10 2,5 8,7 Player 2 C 5,2 11,8 8,4 R 5,4 2,9 8,3 This is a simultaneous move game. In a pure strategy Nash equilibrium of this game, Player 1 receives a payoff of ✓and player 2 receives a payoff of If, instead of playing simultaneously, player 2 moves first, then in the Nash equilibrium player 1 receives a payoff of ✓and player 2 receives a payoff of
1. Consider a two player, simultaneous move game. The strategies available to each player and payoffs are shown in the following matrix form: Player 2 C L R 6,4 5,2 8,5 4,4 9,3 5,9 B 7,5 4,4 5,2 Game 5 T Player 1 M a) Find and write down the Nash equilibria in pure strategies, if any exist. b) Say that instead of being a simultaneous move game this game had been sequential. First player 1 will choose a strategy and then player 2 will observe the choice made by player 1 and choose a strategy. The full structure of the game, including all payoffs, is common knowledge to both players. Sketch a game tree to represent the extensive form of this game. Find and write down the subgame perfect Nash equilibria.
Amazon faces the other group (Other), which consists of e-book manufacturers other than Amazon, in a game in which the players choose a format (either Amazon's format, AZW, or the other group's format, EPUB), as the profit matrix shows. Other What are the pure-strategy Nash equilibria if the firms choose their formats simultaneously and are free to choose either format? Is there a mixed-strategy equilibrium? AZW EPUB Determine the pure-strategy Nash equilibria for this game. 3 -3 A. The Nash equilibria are for Amazon and the other group to select the same format. AZW O B. The Nash equilibrium is for Amazon and the other group to select the AZW format. O C. The Nash equilibrium is for Amazon and the other group to select the EPUB format. Amazon O D. This game has no Nash equilibria. -3 O E. The Nash equilibria are for Amazon and the other group to select different formats. EPUB Determine the mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium for this game. The mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium is for Amazon…
Refer to the payoff matrix below. Assuming this is a sequential game with no collusion, what is the outcome if Firm A moves first to build a new type of commercial aircraft? Explain why fifi rst-mover strategies in the realworld are only as good as the profifit projections on which they are based. How could a supposed “win” from moving first turn out to be a big loss, whereas the “loss” of being preempted turn out to be a blessing in disguise?
Consider the following game: ● ● U P1 M D P2 C R L 1, 24, 36, 5 1,5 2,7 4, 3 2, 43, 25, 2 Identify the undominated strategies of P1 and P2. Which strategies are rationalizable? Find all the Nash equilibrium of this game. Illustrate your answer by a clearly labelled best response graph, with P1's strategy on the x-axis and P2's strategy on the y-axis.
1. In the following payoff matrix, each firm has two possible strategies, and must move simultaneously. Assuming that each knows only its own payoff structure, what decision would each firm make? Is this a Nash equilibrium? Suppose each player can see the entire payoff structure instead of only its own. How would this affect Firm 2? Payoffs shown are (Firm 1, Firm 2): Firm 2 A В A 3, 1 2,0 Firm 1 В 2, 4 1, 5
7. Solving for dominant strategies and the Nash equilibrium Suppose Ethan and Cadence are playing a game that requires both to simultaneously choose an action: Up or Down. The payoff matrix that follows shows the earnings of each person as a function of both of their choices. For example, the upper-right cell shows that if Ethan chooses Up and Cadence chooses Down, Ethan will receive a payoff of 6 and Cadence will receive a payoff of 4. Ethan Up Down Cadence Up 4,3 6, 7 Down 6, 4 7,6 In this game, the only dominant strategy is for to choose The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Ethan chooses and Cadence chooses