Suppose that a person with cancer has the following options: Do nothing: spend nothing and live two more years with each year worth 0.4 of a year in perfect health. Passive treatment: spend $40,000, live four more years with each year worth 0.5 of a year in perfect health. Aggressive treatment: spend $200,000, live ten more years with each year worth 0.6 of a year in perfect health. With adjustment for quality of life, which treatment (passive or aggressive) is most preferred to no treatment on cost-effectiveness grounds? Show your work
Suppose that a person with cancer has the following options: Do nothing: spend nothing and live two more years with each year worth 0.4 of a year in perfect health. Passive treatment: spend $40,000, live four more years with each year worth 0.5 of a year in perfect health. Aggressive treatment: spend $200,000, live ten more years with each year worth 0.6 of a year in perfect health. With adjustment for quality of life, which treatment (passive or aggressive) is most preferred to no treatment on cost-effectiveness grounds? Show your work
Chapter22: Diet And Cancer
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 8RQ
Related questions
Question
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, biology and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you