The authors claim "Poorly crafted law in this area aimed at protecting imperfect technological solutions results in an asymmetrical relationship developing between copyright holders and users as well as the creation of DRM systems that are vulnerable to attack" This paper was published almost 20 year ago. To what extent have the issues raised in the paper been addressed be either law, policy, technology or ethics?

The authors claim "Poorly crafted law in this area aimed at protecting imperfect technological solutions results in an asymmetrical relationship developing between copyright holders and users as well as the creation of DRM systems that are vulnerable to attack" This paper was published almost 20 year ago. To what extent have the issues raised in the paper been addressed be either law, policy, technology or ethics?

Management Of Information Security

6th Edition

ISBN:9781337405713

Author:WHITMAN, Michael.

Publisher:WHITMAN, Michael.

Chapter8: Security Management Models

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4DQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Demonstrate how the ownership of a trademark might come into direct conflict with the right to freedom of expression that is guaranteed by the constitution. How may these seemingly opposing points of view be reconciled with one another to form a coherent whole?
In recent years, the Internet has swiftly developed into a crucial instrument that may be used by individuals to exercise their right to freedom of speech as guaranteed by the First Amendment. Some people are spreading hate speech via social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter. This is an unfortunate reality. Should there be no limits placed on people's ability to express themselves freely on the internet? What measures need to be taken by social media platforms in order to stop the propagation of anti-Semitic content?
Define the copyright's terms. What makes it a representative of engineering ethics and best practices? What are the (Five) most effective methods for preventing copyright violations?
Explain how the right to free speech, which is protected by the Constitution, might be violated by a person's ownership of a trademark. This right is protected by the Constitution. How may these apparently contradictory points of view be brought into closer alignment with one another?
What is the difference between Computer Ethics, IP, Copyright, and Patent, and what are their respective commercial applications?
What effect did internet and computer violations/abuses have on the right to privacy? Was the government able to put a halt to these transgressions (both local and foreign)?
The Internet has quickly achieved reputation as a critical tool for exercising one's right to free expression, and it continues to grow in popularity. Many people and even groups have taken use of the power provided to them by social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter to disseminate hate speech. Given the nature of the medium, is it appropriate for freedom of expression to be unrestricted on the internet? Are there any particular steps that social media platforms should take to prevent the spread of hate speech?
Illustrate how a person's right to free expression, which is guaranteed by the constitution, could be infringed upon by trademark ownership. How might these seemingly incompatible points of view be made to mesh together?
Please explain what the GRANT declaration is capable of achieving and how it has an effect on the protection of intellectual property rights. How does one go about acquiring the many various types of privileges that are available, and what are the benefits of doing so? In the years to come, what are the possibilities that they will be obliged to hand up their licenses?
As a result, the Internet has quickly evolved into a crucial tool for exercising one's right to free expression. Many individuals and even groups misuse the power of social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter to promote hate speech. Should there be no restrictions on the freedom of expression on the internet? To what extent should social media sites go in order to restrict hate-filled remarks?
The use of the Internet as a forum for expressing one's right to free speech has become more significant in recent years. Both Facebook and Twitter are being used by a diverse range of individuals and organizations to facilitate the dissemination of hate speech. Should there be no restrictions put on what people may say in online discussion forums? Where should the line be drawn when it comes to restricting hate speech on social media?
Spell out the parameters of your copyright. For what reason is it considered a crucible for engineering standards and practice? What are the top five methods for protecting intellectual property?