House of Lords

The prospect for change in the House of lords has been an endless debate in British politics. The structure of the Chamber has bought about a significant argument for a transformative change in its composition. The upper chamber has already experienced some reformations over the last 100 years, including the Life Peerages Act (1958) and the Lords Act of 1999. The Lords Act reduced the number of hereditary peers to 92 members. This was seen as a significant amendment but academics claim a greater

country, are very proud). The House of Lords, extortionate to run, unelected by anyone and utterly unnecessary, still exists for some unknown reason. The House of Lords needs to be abolished. We need to take action to prevent the elite members of our society being paid large sums of money to examine laws and make decisions, that quite frankly, have nothing to do with them. If we wanted them to have power in our country, we would have elected them. The House of Lords urgently needs to be abolished

How might the House of Lords be reformed? Britain is the short history of the country in the world. But Britain was the first country to establish a parliamentary system in the world, and was the first national bicameral appear. As the birthplace of modern political system, preserving seven hundred years of the British House of Lords system seems embarrassed. As the second chamber of the British Parliament,the House of Lords members has resigned by queen rather than elected. For a long time, did

The House of Lords is certainly one of the most highly debated parts of the British government. It has been critiqued and reformed many times over the course of hundreds of years, and has continued to come under scrutiny in modern British politics as well. While some feel that the House of Lords is ineffective and an unnecessary part of British government. Others view the House of Lords to be more influential and relevant than it is often given credit for. Although both perspectives on this debate

The other two ways that a member is in the upper chamber is through hereditary peers and Lord Spirituals. The hereditary peers are members whose family was appointed by kings or queens at one point in the United Kingdom's history, and that family has had that seat since appointment; there are ninety members who are appointed because they are hereditary peers. The other seat is given to twenty-four bishops representing the Church of England in the affairs of state. There is controversy about both

• Committee Stage – It is a line by line consideration of the bill; in the House of Commons this will be carried out by a Public Bill Committee that reflects the strengths of the parties in whole house. Although in reflection the committee stage may be taken in the chamber. Whereas in the Lords the committee stage will be held in the chamber or somewhere else in the Palace of Westminster. Public Bill Committee can take verbal or written evidence on the Bill. It’s usually done by people called the

the requirement of the House of Lords considering its benefits and harms. It will also acknowledge its impacts on Westminster and Scottish Parliament, the power of the parliament and the legislative process of constitutional reform. (i) relative functions of “Second Chamber” in the UK Parliament and “unicameral Scotland”- The UK Parliament is bicameral. It has two separate chambers; the House of Lords (upper house) and the House of Commons (lower house). The House of Lords is an unelected chamber

The House of Lords is a section of the UK parliament, which oversees and reviews changed and bills made or passed by the House of Commons. Unlike the House of Commons, the members are not decided by the voting of the general public. There are 2 members who are representing due to their job, the Duke of Norfolk and the Marquess of Cholmondely, who are both responsible for organising royal events. There are then another 90 members who are represented due to one of their ancestors being made a member;

'The House of Lords is now more effective than the House of Commons in checking government power'. Discuss In theory the House of Commons is the dominant chamber as it is elected while the House of Lords plays more of a revising role, issues to be considered include the powers of each chambers, the fact the House of Lords is more independently minded and the impact of the whips. It will ultimately be argued that the House of Commons remains far more effective due to having greater powers in checking

The House of Lords in 1909 consisted mainly of aristocrats that where part of the conservative party. There are many different reasons for the rejection of the people’s budget, which was an idea, brought forward by David Lloyd George of the Liberal party. The swift rejection by the House of Lords sparked the first constitutional crisis of the 20th century. The first reason I am going to bring forward is that this new budget included the idea of taxation on the rich for money that would go to support