Platonic love

Plato has addressed Love from different viewpoint in the Symposium. Alcibiades speech in the Symposium gives a perception about “Platonic love” which according to Plato is the kind of love that involves affectionate relationship between men without sexual intimacy. In the Symposium, Alcibiades enters into the symposium completely drunk and tries to flirt with Socrates and Agathon and gives his speech. It seems like Alcibiades praises Socrates rather than love in his speech. He compares Socrates’s

theory of love, a theory that is often believed to be the universal principle that guides mankind’s actions. Plato introduces several narratives in the form of a dialogue that seek to characterize this multifaceted theory of Eros. The meaning of love naturally varies in each narrative. Yet, in this dialogue of love, Plato presents a metaphysical approach to understanding the ambiguous meaning of love. Ultimately, Plato values the perennial quest for knowledge above all else. In Symposium, Platonic love

Google and type in “Platonic” and see what it turns out. The first description should read “A relationship that is not sexual in nature.” Now many people consider platonic love to be strictly between a boy and a girl, but by definition, platonic love is more than this. Platonic love is a love built between anyone not through blood or crazy confusing emotions, but by time, shared experience, or even crisis. While there are always exceptions, it is not uncommon for platonic love to be just as strong

Love is a topic that has taken over today’s world. From music to movies, everything is now based on the love and relationships between people. However, Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, which is arguably the most famous love story in the world, could also be seen as a warning against love. The play Romeo and Juliet shows how platonic and romantic love can cause tragedy. First of all, platonic love caused tragedy in Romeo and Juliet. One of the ways platonic love lead to tragedy was through the love

definition is love. Unfortunately, the English language uses the word ‘love’ as a blanket term to describe a wide range of emotions, and as a result the word ‘love’ has lost the true weight that it can carry. The type of love that servant leaders should possess should be a platonic love based on no personal conditions. There are many types of love that are based solely on what the lover can gain from the relationship, such as saying, “I love Jim for his bus pass,” but a servant leader should love someone

Erotic Ascension and Stylistic Hoverance: The Symposium Body The initial sentence of the Symposium—“In fact, your question does not find me unprepared”—operates with an odd and mordant brevity. The close sandwiching of “in fact” and “does not” is a performative linkage of qualifiers that, in consideration of later text, functions as stylistic foreshadowing—what might be read as subtle mockery of the dialogic form (in that the sentence responds to an unknown provocatory referent) also hesitantly establishes

Diotima, Socrates' great teacher from the Symposium, a work by Plato was one of the most influential women thinkers of all time, whether she was a real person or a literary fictional character. She related to Socrates the theory of love that he described to the partygoers at Agathon's banquet, a celebration of Agathon's victory at the competition of Dionysis in Athens and of Eros. Before we search for the idea of why Diotima is a woman, we should first discuss a little about her. We know that

Necessary Physical Contant in D.H. Lawrence's Women in Love and Plato's Symposium D.H. Lawrence’s novel, Women in Love, presents a complex model of female-male and male-male relationships. Lawrence’s model relies heavily on a similar model presented in Plato’s Symposium. The difference between the two works lies in the mode of realization; that is, how one goes about achieving a ‘perfect’ love relationship with either sex. Lawrence concentrates on corporal fulfillment, characterized in his

Diotima, Socrates' great teacher from the Symposium, a work by Plato was one of the most influential women thinkers of all time, whether she was a real person or a literary fictional character. She related to Socrates the theory of love that he described to the partygoers at Agathon's banquet, a celebration of Agathon's victory at the competition of Dionysis in Athens and of Eros.      Before we search for the idea of why Diotima is a woman, we should first discuss a little

An Analysis of the Form and Meaning of Happiness in Plato’s Republic I. Introduction One of the central claims of Plato’s Republic is that justice is not only desirable for its own sake, but that it maximises the happiness of those who practice it. This paper examines Plato’s arguments in support of this thesis to determine (a) what he means by happiness, (b) to what extent it exists in his proposed ideal state, and (c) whether this in any way substantiates his claims about the benefits of justice