The White Paper outlines a business proposal for introducing Investcorp into the Swiss market that can offer the company an expansion in their sales, marketing, and clientele. Investcorp is a multifaceted company that deals with various corporate investments, real estate, alternative investment solutions, and credit management. The company has excelled in catering and serving private clients wealth and assets with institutional clients such as Tiffany & Company. Our purpose and objective is to illustrate how investing in Switzerland is not only compatible but profitable for the company. Switzerland is one of the world’s wealthiest, modern, and stable economies with one of the smallest taxation fees within the international market. The …show more content…
In regards, to the size of the investment we would estimate that they should spend anywhere from $550 million to $1 billion to startup their business in Switzerland. This is based off the fact that in 2007 they raised $750 million to invest in new middle markets in North America and Europe, and they also raised $1 billion in a Gulf Opportunity Fund in 2013. These findings demonstrate how the company was willing to raise and invest money because they see the significant return on investment for their company. Additionally, in 2008 their tech fund actually put $500 million into other tech firms to help them globalize. The fact that Investcorp currently manages approximately $21.4 billion in assets, their tech has been able to gain twice (return of investment) of what the company originally invested. Based on this information we can estimate the company can see a return investment of $2 billion to $3 billion entering the Swiss market.
The corporate social responsibility for Investcorp is to assess and take responsibility for the company 's effects on environmental and social well-being. Switzerland is one of the countries that holds companies responsible for environmental well-being. The Swiss government imposes their economic actors to assume their responsibilities towards society. This means that the government is reinforcing the position of Swiss enterprises in terms not only of their competitiveness but also with respects to the part they perform in
Corporate Social Responsibility is an important term that few know of. This term stands for everything that’s moral, from using less harmful chemicals in their products to protecting the rights of the workers and the society we live in. However, some companies do not live by this word. This, coupled with the massive amount of consumers buying their products, can cause a multitude of problems not only for the company workers, but to the world itself. As such, companies should become more aware of their effects on the world around them and change their moral responsibilities to treat their workers more humanely, protect the lives of the people in their towns, cities and countries and save the environment from further destruction and pollution.
Because corporations are established to profit and shareholders invest money with expectations of a greater return, managers cannot be given a directive to be “socially responsible” without providing specific criteria of checks and balances to which needs to adhere. Therefore, it is imperative to the success of a corporation for managers to not act solely but rather to act within the policies of the shareholders.
or so many years our society has been thinking of forming new creative and innovative businesses, which would be more environmental and customer friendly. Nowadays a large number of different companies follow the social, ethical, as well as moral consequences when it comes to their decision making. One of the relatively new concepts involving economic and social concerns is Corporate Social Responsibility. Many of us apply this approach not only at work, but also in everyday life without even recognizing.
There are conflicting expectations of the nature of a company’s responsibilities to society. However, those companies that undertake what may be termed ‘Corporate Social Responsibility’ must decide; what are the actual social responsibilities of these companies? I will present a possible paradigm. Also, I will look at the benefit to the business that employs proper management as compared the business with poor management. This research paper describes my view of corporate social responsibility and compares the social responsibilities of Delta Air Lines and Spirit
Many believe that business entities should have an ethical duty to be socially responsible, to work towards increasing its positive effects on society while decreasing its negative effects. Many organizations look for opportunities to be socially responsible while also creating shareholder wealth.
Corporate Social Responsibility is a philosophy that relates to a business being a part of the society, so acts in a way that not only advances its own firm but also serves the society as well. Good ethics is the cornerstone of sustainable development. In the long run, unethical behavior may harm customers and the society as a whole. Furthermore, it damages a company’s image, efficiency and effectiveness in operations. In some extreme cases, it may jeopardize the company’s survival. As a matter of fact, the behavior of a firm will be judged by the groups of the society. Their judgments and responses will have an impact on the performance of the
Apex Investment Partners was founded in 1987 by James A. Johnson and the First Analysis Corporation. In its eight-year life, the VC had raised three funds. The two first which are already closed had, together, a committed capital of around $70M. There were mainly concentrated in four areas: • • • • Telecommunication, information technology and software. Environmental and industrial productivity-related technologies. Consumer products and specialty retail. Health-care and related technologies.
Archie B. Carroll created a pyramid model to describe the economic responsibility, legal responsibility, ethical responsibility and philanthropic responsibility that a company should have toward the global economy (Kreitner and Kinicki, 2013). Within these four domains, a corporation is expected to be profitable, be legal, be ethical and be a good corporate citizen. There are expectations of the model in which economic, social and environmental responsibilities are fulfilled simultaneously (Shum and Yam, 2011). However, it is not feasible to expect the economic responsibility to automatically translate into the social responsibility aspect. Corporations can be led to engage in social responsibility voluntarily to achieve social good when appropriate legal and ethical influences are established (Shum and Yam, 2011).
* Carl, a portfolio manager for the Alpine Trust Company, has been responsible since 2010 for the City of Alpine’s Employee Retirement Plan, a municipal pension fund. The plan board of trustees directed Karl 5 years ago to invest for total return over the long term. However, as trustees of this
Corporate Social Responsibility (C.S.R.) is a theory practiced in the business sphere since fifty years. It refers to the duty of business organizations to adopt certain activities that will benefit the society in some way. Charity, health-awareness campaigns are few examples that a business undertakes to fulfil its objectives of C.S.R. According to this ideal, it is important for various corporations today to undertake such social activities, apart from merely focusing on their objective of profit maximization. But, is it an obligation that is most important than other objectives of business? This thought further leads us to another significant question – In contemporary settings, should corporations be guided by the concept of C.S.R.?
3003IBA, Project – 2014: An analysis of an international portfolio investment for board of directors.
Corporate social responsibility has been one the key business buzz words of the 21st century. Consumers' discontent with the corporation has forced it to try and rectify its negative image by associating its name with good deeds. Social responsibility has become one of the corporation's most pressing issues, each company striving to outdo the next with its philanthropic image. People feel that the corporation has done great harm to both the environment and to society and that with all of its wealth and power, it should be leading the fight to save the Earth, to combat poverty and illness and etc. "Corporations are now expected to deliver the good, not just the goods; to pursue
The purpose is to highlight the complexities in operating a company in a socially responsible manner while remaining profitable. In addition, outlining key areas essential to meeting evolving needs of stakeholders. Corporate Social Responsibilities (CSR) is broken down into four responsibilities: economic, ethical, legal, and philanthropic. (Carroll & Buchholtz, 34) Moreover, companies’ responsibilities are evolving in regards to society and the global industry as a whole.
Located in Central Europe, Switzerland is known for its natural beauty, chocolate, banks, neutral stance on global politics and hosts the worlds most innovative hub. Switzerland has a track record for attracting global organizations and a variety of industries. Switzerland offers beneficial opportunities for their citizens and the global organizations with no discrimination. This is a very unique model that Switzerland upholds within the fabric of its country. Let’s take a walk thru and analyze the risks in Switzerland; with a focus on the Political Stability, Economic Factors, Subjective Factors, Laws and Regulations and Capital Flight. This paper will breakdown a colorful analysis for multinational corporations deciding to invest Switzerland.
The United Nations Industrial Development Organization(UNIDO) defines ‘Corporate Social Responsibility’(CSR) as “a management concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and interactions with their stakeholders”. The term is explained through a “Triple-Bottom-Line Approach” as being the way through which a company achieves a balance of economic, environmental and social imperatives (“Triple-Bottom-Line”) while at the same time addressing the expectations of shareholders and stakeholders (Elkington, 1997). This approach assumes a very significant light in today’s dynamic world where every aspect of life is inter-connected in a very mysterious fabric, where the alteration of one can affect the others in ways beyond comprehension. Corporate Social Responsibility, both as a term and concept, started becoming popular in the 1960s, when industrialization which sprouted in the Industrial Revolution was fixating its roots all across the world. Industrialization can be defined as the “period of social and economic change that transforms a human group from an agrarian society into an industrial one”. Just like the correlation and dependence of the various aspects of life with each other, it is seen that CSR and Industrialization shared their space of mutual effects as well.