lCARLTON POLISH COMPANY
1. What should Charlie Carlton do? Mr. Carlton should first evaluate the company to see how much it is worth. If he finds that fifty percent of the company is worth more than $2.5 million he should buy the shares from Mr. Miller and run the company as he plans. He can use two methods to determine the value of the company: discount cash flow (DCF) approach and /or comparison with similar companies, which are publically traded. He should also consider relevant non-financial factors such as his family’s history in this company and his parents’dependence on the success of the business.
2. What is the polish/cleaning suppliers market like? The total market for industrial and
…show more content…
5. Assess the financial strength of the company: * The company has never reported a loss for more than 100 years * The proforma financial data in the case indicates an increase of 10% per year in sales. * Carlton Polish is a stable company not significantly affected by the economic cycle. * Growth rate is higher than the industry’s growth rate for each of last 10 years. * The main concern is that the company would have a lot of debt if they have to borrow money from the bank, continue to pay Charlie Carlton’s parents, and pay off the $1 million debt to Mr. Miller. 6. Assess whether the pro forma projections are reasonable or not? The pro forma projections seem reasonable for the following reasons: * From 1976 to 1982 the compound annual growth in net sales was 18.5% and the compound annual growth of after tax profit was 25.9%. Therefore, a 10% net sales growth shown in the proforma financial data seems reasonable. * In addition, the market is expected to keep pace with the general economic in the future. 7. What will shareholder’s equity look like after the transaction? Shareholder’s equity would be lower than that shown in 1982 ($318,000) because the company has to pay off interest and principal for many loans. There will be little money left for shareholder’s equity. 8. What is a reasonable estimate of the company’s worth?
1. Using the excel spreadsheet provided, and the recommended consequential disclosures as a basis you your analysis, what recommendations would you give Phillips on each of the items listed below? In each case, justify your recommendations and estimate how much the decision will change the “true” value of the company and its value in the eyes of an investor in a private company.
The next 3 years witnessed a continuous increase in sales and revenues. Their profit margin increased to reach 4.97% by year 1992.
It is important for Scott to have experience in different aspects of the business so that he can make well judged decisions; without experience and knowledge, the likelihood of running down a company is high
The company’s ability to generate profitability might not be constant and subject to a lot of factors.
1. In the last five years the growth in sales for the company has been around 10% per annum, except for the 1997, the growth was 18.78%. In the case, nothing is mentioned that company has made any drastic changes in its strategy to grow faster. In such a scenario, projected a consistent growth of 20% per annum for the next 5 years is too optimistic.
• Coleco is dependent on debt through years (also successful ones) • The company has a huge amount of total liabilities (in 1987 about $ 620 mln) • No resources to pay debts (Negative equity, Assets are generally composed of Accounts receivables) • Company by the moment already does not comply with the creditors requirements
Total shareholders’ equity increased $21,735,000 or 3.9% YoY. Capital stock and contributed surplus increases were quite insignificant, but accumulated other comprehensive income increased 114.4% YoY, and the accumulated deficit decreased $77,104,000 or 54.2% YoY. Other equity is now at zero from ($154,239,000) last year (refer to financial liability) due to the final payment made for the remaining 45% stake in Honsel
years, sales had increased at a 7% compound rate, while earnings, benefiting from substantial cost
The company lost money almost every year since its leveraged buyout by Coniston Partners in 1989. The income generated was not sufficient to service the interest expenses of the company which stood at $2.62B in 1996. From Exhibit 1, we can say that interest coverage ratio computed as EBIT / Interest Expense was 1.31 in 1989 and has been decreasing over years and currently stands at 0.59. This raises a question of how the company can meet its interest payments without raising cash or selling assets.
From an operational perspective, the annual sales growth of 2% is behind the industry average of 6% per
Market value proportions of: Debt = $1,147,200 / $4,897,200 = 23.4% Pref. Share = $1,250,000 / $4,897,200 = 25.5% Common equity = $2,500,000 / $4,897,200 = 51.1%
1. Analyze the economic rationale of the Carborundum acquisition. Under what conditions an acquisition would be expected to add to shareholder value in general? Do any of these reasons apply to Carborundum acquisition?
2) Given that BT Yellow Pages accounted for 85% of the U.K. classified directories advertising revenues, we assume it would keep the market growth rate of 5.5%, above 2001 yoy data 4.9% in 2001 but below the 1996-1999 industry data
Analyse the company’s financial performance, over two years, using the following ratios (you will need to present your results):
The two methods that are used by the expert include the comparable transactions method, which uses the multiples in the market to determine the value, and also the DCF method, which is used to discount the future cash flows back to determine the current value of the shares. Different methods have different strengths and weaknesses. According to Ross (2009), the comparable transaction method is used and the strength is that it uses the historical actual transactions that are comparable to the Woolworths transaction, so that the valuation is justified by the market conditions. In the meantime, the weakness of the comparable transaction is that different transactions have different companies involved and the transactions are conducted in