Case Study Analysis

I observed five different leadership styles in this movie, and I felt that each of them were effective because of the timing of the leadership style used based on the situation at hand. Authoritative leadership skills were used at the beginning of the movie when the coaches, players and the rest of the staff met for the first time. Being the new coach, Boone needed to get everyone to follow his vision for the team since the school was just recently racially integrated. The racial integration put great

When it comes to Coach Knight’s leadership style, I want to consider it be a demanding leadership style. Since Knight always demands his players for following his rules and doing exactly what he says. In his approach, the basic assumption about motivation and leading is discipline. He stated that the most important thing for winning a game is preparation. Instead of a will to win, every player in his team should have the will to prepare to

The essay “Coach Fitz Management Theory” was written by Michael Lewis and the stories mentioned were based on past and present comparisons. Most of the ideologies strictly informed that the process is essential, and while Fitz talks about winning, it is the desire and not the victory that is important. There are many examples that refer back to the different statements about winning versus the process. Valuing the process towards a particular goal and perfecting that process will provide you with the success desired. On the other hand, the ability to provide the process, which includes self-motivation and hard work necessary. The different writing techniques used to give off different perspectives for the reader to understand. The essay mainly intended the reader to understand the level of entitlement that parents have with a team and the goals/process that must be met in order to win.

In conclusion, Although Coach K was originally mentored by Coach Knight as both a player and as an assistant coach; they both have adopted different styles of leadership. They appear to be almost polar opposites, yet have both managed to have done well in their respective field. As the late Emanuel Rohn once said, “The challenge of leadership is to be strong but not rude; be kind, but not weak; be bold, but not a bully; be humble, but not timid; be proud, but not arrogant; have humor, but without folly”. If only Coach Knight had followed this simple statement, how much further would he have gone?

After reports of several transgressions and the surface of a damaging videotape which appeared to show Knight physically assaulting a former player, the president of Indiana, Neil Reed, had explained to Knight that there was a zero tolerance policy where Knight was concerned (Wolff, 2000). Despite the repeated warnings and the newly stated zero tolerance policy, Knight continued to commit transgressions that eventually got him fired from Indiana University where he had coached for almost three decades. Indiana University took a thrashing from Knight fans’ over this decision, but keeping Knight as an agent of the University could have resulted in a legal disaster. From a Biblical worldview, the

I chose to review “Leading with the Heart Coach K’s Successful Strategies for Basketball, Business and Life” Mike Krzyzewski, Donald T. Phillips, and Grant Hill (Forward), 2001. The book is written by Duke Basketball coach Krzyzewski, in it he recalls some of his most significant games and events in his career. He also offers advice to anyone who is trying to do better in life. Coach K, "There are five fundamental qualities that make every team great: communication, trust, collective responsibility, caring and pride." The book has four sections; Preseason, Regular Season, Postseason, and All-Season. Each section four chapters. In each chapter he provides readers with an understanding into how he selects, learns about, and builds his team.

In his coaching it was not all glamour, on March 15, 1963 Arizona State defeated UCLA 93-79 the first game of the NCAA Western Regional Tournament. John had just created a new dimension of a 2-2-1-zone press that was designed to force teams to shoot the ball quickly. The final score did not discourage Wooden for at the end he announced that he liked what he had seen. John Wooden worked with his players and on March 20, 1965 UCLA won the second consecutive National Championship using Wooden’s zone. Determination in any sport is crucial and that is what John Wooden had in every practice and game. This trait of John Wooden’s was by far the strongest and the earliest developed. When John graduated from the 8th grade his father gave him a card with three rules, don't wine, don't complain, and don't make excuses. From these rules John knew that the only other option was to succeed. He built a Big Ten University from what was once an organization without a home court. His players saw the determination in there coach and displayed it as well. By showing determination and instilling it in his player John taught that the people who do work the hardest will receive the glory and the ones with natural ability can only strive so

Research proved that athletes found their coaches training as well as instruction behavior and their style of coaching did have an impact on individual performance. This was important research for me in understanding how those I coach perceive my leadership and whether or not I am effective as their leader. My teams’ outstanding performance or lack of performance can be a direct link to my type of leadership skills in addition to my training. The primary role of any coach or athletic leader is to help their athletes and improve on their individual performance. “Several sport studies exploring the coach-athlete relationship claim that effective coaching includes basic ingredients such as empathic understanding, honesty, support, liking, acceptance, friendliness, cooperation, caring and respect” (Moen, Hoigaard, & Peters, 2014, p. 76). The challenge for me is finding the balance between being supportive and meeting the individual needs of team members while also enhancing their ability and understanding of the sport. Understanding how to lead and coach various personalities within the team is essential to the team’s

Coach K has been a leader stemming from his days at West Point where his was the basketball coach, he instills his values into each one of his players, values such as commitment, toughness, pride, love, honesty, integrity, friendship and collective responsibility, all values that make up an effect leader. Coach Krzyzewski has been coaching for nearly three decades, he has high expectations for himself and for his player, and he states to all recruits “I’m going to give you my best. I’m going to give you 100 percent. In return, I expect you to graduate. You’ll be coming to Duke for more than basketball. If you don’t understand that, then don’t come to Duke. I want you to be passionate about basketball, but I also want you to obtain a great education” (Krzyzewski, 2000). An effective leader does not simply lead their colleagues, they inspire them to go forth and do great things. Those leaders also enquire a great sense of preparation and that could be the difference between thriving and dying, “we knew without preparation, we had a good chance of losing that game” (Krzyzewski, 2008). In a leadership position the relationship between everyone involved is detrimental to how the overall moral is. The ways that leaders handle those relationships greatly effect the path of success. Coach Krzyzewski instills a lot of trust in his players, treating them with a great respect and infuses a family like atmosphere in his locker-room, “family makes individuals part of

Pat Summitt and Mike Krzyzewski are legendary coaches icons that will always be remembered for their lifetime achievements and winning the championships in a unique style. It’s tranquil to say that they are great coaches but what enhanced their ability to be even better was their capability to showcase transformational leadership and emotional intelligence. These two individuals have set a new standard for what the coaches should instill in their personal values to allow them to be consistent in the efforts to inspire a vison, challenge the process, encourage the heart, enable others to act, and model the way.

Coach Mike Krzyzewski was a phenomenal coach and leader. He had the most career wins in NCAA Division I history. His is a prime example of exceptional leadership. Throughout the book Leading with the Heart I have seen prime examples of the following leadership theories: transformational leadership, trait theory, behavioral theory, and power and influence theory.

Of course all leaders also have areas for improvement, or developmental areas. After all of the positive aspects of Mr. Koterba’s leadership already mentioned above, it seems strange to suggest that the same man so involved and personal invested in his job would have the biggest developmental need of being more hands on as a coach. Maybe saying Mr. Koterba was hands off is not the right term, perhaps using a term from the book, laissez-faire, would be more appropriate. As I mentioned Mr. Koterba spent countless hours planning and helping to put his athletes in the best position to succeed. However, what it came down to it he gave everyone the control of their own destinies. What I mean by that is that he was never one of those coaches who looked

To be an effective leader you have to know yourself, your people and your business while leading the team through different conflict-situations that may increase the stress level of each team member and on the organization. It is critical for the leader to understand his own management style and that of his team members and using the analyses in becoming a more effective coach and mentor. This analysis will look into the relationship between Wolfgang Keller and Dmitri Brodsky.  Wolfgang is the Managing Director at Konsigsbrau-TAK (A) and Dmitri is a direct report. The two individuals have very different management styles, experiences and cultural backgrounds.  The analysis will review their management style differences,

Also when he straight away gets to the point and states the contract the team must follow. Carter also maintains the situation and shows awareness in order to anticipate needed actions. Ken also has a quality to improvise to handle the changing situation such as when he locks the team out of the gym due to there poor grades or when he hypes them up during a game and gives the tips and motivation talks. Qualities that a good coach much posses are qualities like Ken Carter. He ensures that the task is understood, supervised and accomplished. To do this he clearly states his expectations, such as the contract he gives them to sign and follow if they want to play. Ken also considers the teams development needs, such as maintaining a 2,3 in there academic studies and also ensuring that they will be winners regardless the outcome of the game, like when they just loose the final match. A good quality that Coach Carter has is his respect for the players and his term of the word respect. When Ken Carter took on the responsibility of coaching this team it was clear that he was more4 concerned with the people under his care that winning games. This shows a great amount of respect for the players and in the journey the players come to respect him for it. When Coach Carter cared about the future of the people in this team, the team became winners and not often are the coaches that set there sights on winning and influencing the lives

What techniques will you propose to CB to generate ideas that can be developed into viable concepts?