Essay on Exxon Mobil

The oil and gas business is highly competitive in the exploration for and acquisitions of reserves, the acquisition of oil and gas leases, equipment and personnel required to find and produce reserves, and in the gathering and marketing of oil, gas, and natural gas liquids. The competitors include national oil companies, major integrated oil and gas companies, other independent oil and gas companies, and participants in other industries supplying energy and fuel to industrial, commercial, and individual consumers.

The top five Oil and Gas companies are: Saudi Aramco, Gazprom, National Iranian Oil Company, ExxonMobil and PetroChina. These company work together by using some sort of scare tatic in order to raise fuel prices. Take ExxonMobil for example, these companys have combinded forces in the United to States. These companies tell the American people gas prices went up due to the fact that there oil refineories are under maintaince. As a result gas price increase Where as in the 1990’s when these were two serpeate companies they had to compete with each other and prices were much lower. The growth in capitalism has

While Standard Oil did come to basically control the price of oil in the United States, it never engaged in 'predatory', or deep and unnecessary price cutting to push out it's competitors. John McGee states this about how Standard Oil accomplished this by other means: “It is correct that Standard discriminated in price, but it did so to maximize profits given the elasticities of demand of markets in which it sold. It did not use price discrimination to change those elasticities. Anyone who has relied upon price discrimination to explain Standard's dominance would do well to start looking for something else. The place to start is merger” (McGee 168). Carnegie on the other hand preferred to buy out all competitors that were in the same area of production as he was, and consolidate. Through consolidating most steel mills in the Pittsburgh/Pennsylvania area, he was able to control that particular step of the production process in the steel business, therefore maximizing his profits like Rockefeller, but in a different way. Carnegie preferred stable prices and stable business, and Harold Hotelling manages to place Carnegie's view on why he consolidated his mills as such: “This is the fact that of all the purchasers of a commodity, some buy from one seller, some from another, in spite of moderate differences of price. If the purveyor of an

ExxonMobil is identified as one of the world’s leading oil and gas businesses. It manages market commodities and means countrywide. ExxonMobil is entail in “marketing, gas, and oil exploration, transportation and production in roughly 200 nations” (ExxonMobil, 2015). This company furnishes assistance and products under label names such as “Mobil, Esso, and Exxon. ExxonMobil is known as one of the biggest oil industrial installation where a substance is refined in the nation” (ExxonMobil, 2015). This essay discusses ExxonMobil’s strategic initiative from

Intro: Chevron and Exxon are two major gasoline providers for North America. While typical citizens see their existence as gas station companies, they have other aspects to their company. Chevron also produce and transport crude oil and natural gas, refine, market and distribute transportation fuels and lubricants, manufacture and sell petrochemical products, and generate power and produce geothermal energy. (http://www.chevron.com/about/leadership/). Exxon is also another well-known company. Exxon produces and sells fuel and produces petrochemical products. Chevron and Exxon have both been on the fortune 500 list for over five years. Human resource policies, merging of companies, and ____ have all contributed to the success of these companies.

It was vital to nationalize Chevron and Texaco due to many factors. First, the two companies were concerned that the Nazi move might come through the Persian Gulf. Another factor was the

Between the Exxon and Chevron companies, Chevron proves to be more profitable than Exxon since Chevron shrunk less in

From the recent case data, ExxonMobil has not acted irresponsibility in pricing its gasoline products. Outside of the grocery industry, I have not heard of any business segments surviving on less than a 5% profit margin. In reading that ExxonMobil reported only a net profit of 8.5%3, it is difficult to state that the firm over priced its products to reap abnormal profits. Although Mr. Lee Raymond’s $400 million retirement seems grossly out of proportion in utilitarian terms, adding these funds back into the firm’s bottom line would not change the profit results. With profit margins of less than 10%, it is unlikely that ExxonMobil would be able to keep the price of gasoline fixed if sweet crude oil were to increase from $80 per barrel to $88. This 10% increase in raw material cost would have to be passed through to the customer in the form of higher prices for the firm to survive.

The U.S. was supposed to be the world’s new swing oil producer, able to nimbly open and close the taps in response to market forces, thanks to its bounty of shale fields.” In the past a barrel of oil has been one hundred dollars, recently it has dropped to thirty dollars. Though some wells can be profitable at low prices it puts a serious strain on the oil industry as explained in this article.

Chevron proved to experience more growth over the years then Exxon. Although Exxon is doing quite well and is larger than Chevron, Chevron’s profit margins are higher, and they have experienced more growth. I found that Exxon was more profitable because their 5th quarter earnings rose 6 percent and with a decrease in operating expenses, because most of their oil and gas are produced outside the U.S. where labor is much cheaper. During that year Exxon’s profits were Bust shy of breaking Global records (Exxon Mobil Financial Notes). Chevron’s non-controlling interests were very interesting as well as their Cash Flow Notes.

Although it might seem like the gas and oil market is dominated by a few mega-corporations, independent, family-owned oil companies continue to thrive. The reason for this is that family-owned energy companies offer local customers a number of benefits that larger chains are unable to provide.

Exxon and Chevron are no doubt some of the leading incorporated oil companies on the globe. Exxon Corp. is the second largest oil firm after Royal Dutch Shell, it is respected for getting the biggest revenue return in 2008 which no company in the U.S. have ever reported before. According to Wilson (2009) Chevron has managed to show a lot of profitability in the market despite the decease in its oil production. It graded as one of firms which made a billion dollars profit within a week in the period of July to September 2008. Regardless of profitability trends set by the two oil firms in the U.S. market, they have been facing financial decline like the rest of the companies in other industries. The two firms are like two sailing ships which are taking longer time to sink. In the last few years, the production capacity of Chevron and Exxon has decreased and their listings on the stock market have become weak. The continuation of construction and drilling which requires billions of dollars in expense of oil production might make them experience a bigger financial crisis (Wilson, 2009).

One of the most reputable resources that Exxon Mobil has today is a strong brand name. Exxon Mobil operates all over the world and is recognized in every part of the world (Datamonitor, 2008). When people all over the world know who a company is, what they do, and where they are located, the company gains a unique competitive advantage over

While ExxonMobil’s engagement with communities that are proximal to their operations can often be described as proactive and

This report consists of financial analysis of Exxon Mobil Corporation and it is based on the company annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, on the company’s official documents placed at their website and on other appropriate sources. For convenience and simplicity, in this report the terms ExxonMobil, Exxon, Esso and Mobil, as well as terms like Corporation, Company, their and its, are sometimes used as abbreviated references to specific affiliates or groups of affiliates.