Hillary Hoover Pros And Cons

Former first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton is known throughout the world for the astounding things she has accomplished, not only in the White House, but out. She is full of passion for whatever she sets as her goal. Her confidence and constant motivational talks set a crowd on fire and her vision for the future leaves most encouraged for they know that she’s on their side. She is constantly aware of what others think of her and works her hardest to make the world a better place and gain the trust of the people. Hillary Rodham Clinton was chosen by her husband to be the leader of the Health Care Reform and supervised research, investigatory trips, financial reports, numerous committees composed of medical and insurance professionals, lawmakers and

She has also put her agenda to strengthen unions and protect workers bargaining power. Hillary wants to protect the worker from employer misclassification, wage theft and other various forms of exploitations. She will fight for all hard working americans should deserve a secure and comfortable retirement plan.

On taxes, Hillary believes the wealthy pay too little in taxes and the middle class pays too much. She would plan to offer tax relief to working

Some pros to Hillary Clinton are that she has worked as a politician most of her life and has experience in both the White house and in the lower parts of the U.S.

The 2016 Presidential Election is coming sooner and sooner as each day passes, and it’s approaching the point where all eligible voters need to become informed about the each of the Democrat and Republican candidates running in the 2016 Presidential bid. The voter should be aware of what each candidate represents and what their values are and from that the voter can decide which candidate suits their beliefs best and vote for said candidate when the time comes. In this upcoming election, in my opinion, the candidate that wants the best for the majority of the citizens of the United States is Senator Bernie Sanders. His views in politics, connect with many poor and middle class families because all throughout his political career and his 2016

Hillary proposes a stimulus package just like the one Barack Obama created. It has been shown that whatever effects the Obama stimulus had were too little to detect for any normal americans looking for better jobs. This has added to the U.S debt especially after Obama spent $800 billion, only difference is that Hillary wants to spend $275 billion. In addition, when it comes to jobs Hillary wants to increase the federal minimum wage because she believes that giving more money to consumers will allow them to spend it at their business and help U.S employers. All this idea/plan will do is destroy businesses by giving consumers more money to spend, and giving businesses less. She knows nothing when it comes to the nation’s economic problems. The National Review says, “Mrs. Clinton does not know very much about any business other than charging $10,000 (http://www.nationalreview.com/) (https://www.thestreet.com).

Hence, she takes a more moderate approach than others, but still a much more progressive stance than others. As it concerns the economy, Hillary is looking to give working families a raise by increasing minimum wage and also by giving tax relief to help them manage increasing costs (“Raise American Incomes” 1). She wants to create well paying jobs and stimulate an increase in pay rates by investing in infrastructure, clean energy and scientific and medical research to strengthen growth of the economy (“Raise American Incomes” 1). Perhaps most importantly, she wants to close corporate loop holes and make the wealthy pay their fair share (“Raise American Incomes”

“Hillary is continuing a lifelong fight to ensure women have access to reproductive health care.” and “Make premiums more affordable and lessen out-of-pocket expenses for consumers purchasing health insurance on the Obamacare exchanges.” (“Affordable health care is a basic human right.”). However, Hillary isn’t only prepared for the issues at hand, but is very active in causes that are of an importance. For example, everyone does deserve to be treaty equally whether they are a woman, lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender. I agree with Hilary Clinton’s plans on dealing with most of the issues at hand including college cost, cost of healthcare, the obscene amount of money used in politics, and immigration in the United

As expected trump won all the solid red states and major swing states like Texas and Ohio. Such support was adequate to swamp Clinton's support among nonwhite voters in states like Florida and North Carolina, and fueled him to his stunning bombshell triumphs in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. In spite of an absence of political experience deep down inside I thought Donald Trump would come out on top in the US presidential decisions do to the fact all the craziness that was going on with Hillary. Obviously regardless of a progression of contentions his message resounded with a colossal number of American voters in key states, and uncovered profound anarchistic outrage and discontent. Donald Trump won Texas on the quality of enormous edges with white and

Imitating FDR “four freedoms” address, Hillary declared “four fights for you” theme of building the economy, strengthen families, defending the country from foreign threats and reforming the government. Presenting herself as a populist, Hillary gave a list of ideas she would push as president such as paid family leave, equal pay, cutting student debt, undo Citizen United Supreme Court decision of super-PAC political spending by a constitutional amendment, and reproductive freedom for woman with little details on how she would do it.

According to Hillary for America, Clinton wants to invest in medical and scientific research, infrastructure and clean energy. She plans to provide tax cuts for small businesses and the middle class while eliminating tax loopholes for the wealthy. She supports increasing the federal minimum wage to $12 and a tax credit for corporations that offer workers a legitimate opportunity to participate in a profit-sharing program. In addition, she wants to improve federal funding for higher education so that students can earn college degrees without resorting to

Hillary Clinton supports diversity in this country. She supports same sex marriage, allowing her citizens to be diverse and do love who they want to love. Immigration is being allowed, obviously under certain conditions, but she is allowing people from other countries to enter the land of the free and find new lives over here. Hillary Clinton is supporting diversity and the ability to be who we are in this country, not who the government wants us to be.

Her economic policies and proposals are especially geared towards increasing minimum wages, taxing speculative behavior, and supporting trade policies and programs that benefit domestic workers. Her policies will ensure that the recent economic growth enabled by the Obama’s Democratic policies are sustainable and create a competitive advantage for the United States. Her policy positions and experience makes her the best presidential candidate for the 2016 presidential

On unity, the week started on a very ragged note. The streets of Philadelphia were full of disheartened Bernie Sanders supporters, angered by the WikiLeaks memos showing a Democratic Party that had its thumb on the scale to tilt Hillary's way. It was irrelevant that primaries are not won by the DNC, but by the organisations the candidates build - and the final nomination roll call showed Clinton beating Sanders by 1,000 delegates. The bias inside the DNC was wrong and bitter to the Sanders forces. But by Tuesday, the head of the DNC was out, and Sanders, to his great credit, moved on the floor to make Clinton's nomination unanimous. He would not have done that if Clinton had stolen the nomination.

The demographic breakdown of income based voters does not demonstrate a "revolt" of the middle class. It does, however, reveal the known tendency of lower income voters gravitating towards the Democratic side; while, relatively speaking, higher income voters drift towards the Republican party.