preview

Indian Removal Act Dbq Essay

Decent Essays

Edward Everett, an American politician, once said, “Nations of dependent Indians, against their will, under color of law, are driven from their homes into the wilderness.” In the late 1820s, Americans arrived at the land of Native American tribes and Indian tribes for gold; they promised to relocate the tribes in exchange of money and land in order for them to expand their territory. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was passed that gave Americans to negotiate with the Cherokees to leave the land and be placed in the Indian Territory. Tricking someone is like taking candy from an innocent kid . The Indian Removal Act isn’t justified because the Cherokees owned the land, disagreed with their leader, and they’re a civilized nation. One reason of the unjustification of the Indian Removal Act is the fact that the Cherokees owned the land before the Americans arrived; their tribe have lived on the land for hundred of years. A passage from Georgia Encyclopedia states, “White people in Georgia and other southern states that …show more content…

A quote from History Net explains, “Many of their leaders were well educated; many more could read and write; they had their own written language, thanks to Sequoyah, a constitution, schools, and their own newspaper.” This shows that they are civilized and educated people with a thriving community. Even with their civilization, they were still mistreated by the Americans, a passage from Britannica explains, “The rapid settlement of land east of the Mississippi River made it clear by the mid-1820s that the white man would not tolerate the presence of even peaceful Indians there.” The opposite side reasons that the Cherokees aren’t civilized and safe to be with because they killed and scalped Americans but the Cherokees only did that because they saw the Americans do the exact same thing to other Native American and Indian

Get Access