Negotiation is the discussion between opposing parties aimed at coming to an agreement. In this simulation negotiation I assumed the role of Jane Tech, a college student seeking employment at a high tech internet firm. After completing a summer internship at Robust Routers, Leigh Bultema, a manager at RR expresses interest in hiring me as a full-time employee. I received a letter with the terms of the job offer, however I do not agree with some of the conditions and terms of the offer. As a result, Ms. Leigh and I agreed to discuss the offer via the telephone. I chose to use the interest based technique to negotiate the terms of the offer. Using the interest based technique allows an opportunity for me to focus on the main objectives and …show more content…
The walk -away points were set using the same criteria. As an associate product manager, I expect an annual salary of $80,000 minimum and a maximum of $100,000. I’ll also assume the role of the assistant product manager with a minimum salary of $62,000 and a max of $64,000. My aim is to conduct a neutral collaborative negotiation and avoid using bargaining to ensure both parties result in a win-win, rather than a win-lose. Ms. Leigh and I were very clear about our objectives and desired results. During the negotiation process both parties used the power technique in an attempt to persuade the other. Ms. Leigh used her power to leverage the position offered. I used my power to obtain the desired salary, year-end bonus, and additional perks. The presence of alternatives impacted the negotiation to a great degree. When I announced I received a job offer from a competitor the intensity of the negotiation changed. Ms. Bultema instantly realized she needed to compromise if she wanted me to sign on with her
Dr. Margaret Neale, Professor of Organizational Behavior, Stanford University Graduate School of Business, the narrator and instructor, describes the objective of the video. She drives us though the process and gives us tips, recommendations, common errors and many explanations about what is happening during the negotiation.” (Video Media Group of the Stanford Alumni Association, 1997)
Gina Blair and Daniel Trent cooperate and collaborate to achieve a common objective throughout their negotiation. A cooperative negotiation style is demonstrated as they combine their points of view regarding their clients concerns with outcomes to effectively solve the issues raised. The main focus of the negotiation is to reach an agreement rather than a continuous dispute. Accordingly, the conflicting objectives were resolved by compromises and solutions but forward by both Gina and Daniel. The negotiation style used between Gina and Daniel is described as principled negotiation where both parties jointly attack the problems arising to achieve a compromise.
was my goal to focus on collaborative negotiation strategies. I have been involved in a huge number of
Our team approached this negotiation case in a very efficient way. Each of us had a very clearly job assignment. Two people took care of the calculation while the other two people were responsible for the negotiation. Thus we quickly built up a model and provided several options to our counterparts with different terms but same net value of the final bargaining agreement to our team.
Negotiations are a part of daily life whether we are aware of them occurring or not. In everything that we do there are preferred end results and the end results are likely to affect more than one person. The goal in this however, is to ensure that all parties are equally benefited from the actions and reactions that occur to create that end result. While some dealings are done in a more subtle manner without a great deal of negotiation per say there are other situations that would warrant more vocalized mutually acceptable compromises. The purpose of this paper will be to effectively explain a situation of which required negotiation on the part of both parties that almost all of us have endured and that would be the process of buying a
1. How did you plan for the negotiation? Explain how you decided on a strategy?
For the Texoil negotiation, I was in the role of the Service Station Owner. As such, my main objective was to sell the station and get the best possible agreement. My BATNA was $400,000, which represented an offer from British Petroleum and my resistance point was $413,000 after tax, which represented the cost of my trip. My target was $488,000, which included an additional $75,000 to help tie me over until I found a job upon my return. This resistance point represents a purely financial alternative. However, there were several other criteria or interests other than strictly financial which could have been satisfied through non-financial means. My underlying interest or reason for selling the station was
The negotiation between Joe and Leigh had elements of distributive bargaining, but their relationship and the outcome of the negotiation were important to both parties, thus, this negotiation also had collaborative bargaining characteristics (Lewicki, Barry, & Saunders, 2010). When using this strategy, the objective is to maximize your outcome on the substantive issues while enhancing the quality of the relationship with the other party (Lewicki, Barry, & Saunders, 2011). In a job offer negotiation between two familiar parties, it is important to find a mutually satisfying solution to also enhance business performance.
Consequently, negotiation is a process that can be approached in many ways. No matter what strategy we choose, success lies in how well we prepared. The key to negotiating a beneficial outcome is the negotiators’ ability to consider all the elements of the situation carefully and to identify and think through the options. At the same time, negotiators must be able to keep events in perspective and be as fair and honest as circumstance allows. Because a common ground or interest has brought the parties to the negotiating table, a negotiator can benefit by trying to capitalize on this common
Negotiation is the process of making amicable decisions between individuals or groups. In this assignment, I will discuss a negotiation that did not result in the best possible solution for all parties. This negotiation was related to my work experience where I was a realtor who was representing a buyer in negotiation of the property’s price, mortgage loan rate and terms. I am a real estate licensee and also a member of National Association of Realtors. I have been practicing my license for seven years now. Seven years of experiences in real estate industry
Both our approaches were directed towards addressing the issues with a collaborative spirit for the greatest benefit to both sides. We agreed that both sides wanted to establish a long term a relationship with each other and were willing to give genuine consideration to each other’s particular needs and interests. This experience has enabled me to reflect on my personal approach towards negotiation, as well as analyze my strengths and potential areas for improvement as a negotiator.
Whether or not we are aware of it, each of us is faced with an abundance of conflict each and every day. From the division of chores within a household, to asking one's boss for a raise, we've all learned the basic skills of negotiation. A national bestseller, Getting to Yes, introduces the method of principled negotiation, a form of alternative dispute resolutions as opposed to the common method of positional bargaining. Within the book, four basic elements of principled negotiation are stressed; separate the people from the problem, focus on interests instead of positions, invest options for mutual gain, and insist on using objective criteria. Following this section of the book are suggestions for problems that may occur and finally a
Whether it is at work, church or in our private relationships, negotiations are a necessary tool for reaching an agreement. They are made by discussing each parties point of view with the aim being to reach an agreement that is mutually beneficial. For the most part, negotiation is the process by which those people involved successfully adopt or abandon their respective position through the use of positional bargaining. There are different types of approaches for the negotiation process - some hard and others soft in their manner of approach. The desired outcome of
Since I received a verbal offer prior to receiving the official offer letter, I had enough time to perform the market research and realize what others are being paid in a similar industry. After receiving the offer letter, I gave myself a day understand the offer before negotiating since this exploding offer had a tight deadline (Lewicki, R., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. (2011), p. 51). I read various strategies as to how to tackle phone negotiation. I decided to go for integrative negotiations and focus on developing mutually beneficial agreements because it is a long term affair (Spangler, B. (2003)). My strategy also included expanding the pie (Pinkley, R., & Northcraft, G. (2000), p. 86). I prepared a strategy to make a strong counteroffer based on my market
Salary negotiation is typically the final step in the job recruitment process. This interaction is important because it allows the employee and employer to explore information gaps and it sets the tone for future interactions (Porter, Conlon & Barber, 1999). A successful salary negotiation benefits both parties and potentially sets the tone for a long-term relationship. A win-win solution is an important outcome and an integrative negotiation strategy should be used so both parties can achieve their goals. According to Lewicki, Saunders and Barry, (2011), “the goals of the parties in integrative negotiation are not mutually exclusive and one party’s gain is not at the other party’s expense” (p.62).