Linux Vendors Comparisons
DeVry University
During my research of Linux vendors, I have narrowed my options to three distinct vendors. I have found Red Hat, Novell, and Ubuntu were three of the best companies worldwide. Each vendor has their advantages and disadvantages. I will address the positive and negative points of each vendor. The main differences between the three vendors that I will discuss are cost, training & support, performance & reliability, and lastly availability. The first thing I will discuss is cost. Cost is always an important issue that must be addressed for a business. A product that does not have an equal or gain return when compared to its cost would be considered a poor
…show more content…
Each of the vendors offers to provide training to our staff as part of the purchase. They also offer to continue to train our staff as long as we have an account with them. Customer support is also a crucial part of our decision. We need excellent customer support from the vendor. We also need quick response to our request for customer support. Red Hat specifically states that it has 24/7 customer support. What that means is that twenty-four hours and day seven days a week, Red Hat customer support is ready to provide their services. Ubuntu states that it offers profession support to its customers. Novell also supports the use of Macs and their operation system (OS). Some of the advantages of selecting each vendor’s product are similar and still somewhat distinct. Red Hat in (For sap business,) states, “that is a responsive customer support, higher performance standards, collaborative engineering for better products, and designed-in security.” Customer support is a very important advantage. Higher performance standards are also an important advantage. Higher performance means we will get what we paid for or more in our return. According to (Stevens, 2011) there are several pros and cons to using Red Hat. Some of the advantages are its scalability in the processors and memory, ability for hot-swapping of processors, and an integrated KVM virtualization with Kernel Samepage Merging and SELinux sandbox options. Some of the cons of Red Hat are its server
This statement indicates that there should be careful and deliberate choices when choosing a web server. Many different operating systems are available to use as a webserver. One of the most popular is Linux. Linux and UNIX are very reliable when it comes to security. Versions of Linux include Red Hat, Ubuntu, CentOS and Fedora. The advantages of Linux based web servers are easily modified, stable, and secure. Red Hat Linux is currently the best with regards to performance at large scale. UNIX is also a viable option when looking for an operating system. Comparable to Linux, it’s very reliable, easy to customize and secure as well. However, its hardware requirements and cost make it difficult to make it into a web server. Microsoft Windows Server operating systems are a very popular method for an operating system. Microsoft offers different versions of its server software including the 2003, 2008 and 2012 editions. The Microsoft platform is a great choice because most of the online applications are adaptable to use on their OS. Support for Microsoft is readily available as well, making it even harder to choose another OS. The only down sides are that it is not as secure as the previously mentioned Linux platform and because Microsoft uses licensing for their OS, it can be pricey to add to use for the system.
Cost efficient. For using Linux Boeing can save cost that would increase its net income.
1. (TCO A) The relationship between speed of innovation and product obsolescence is (Points : 5)
We have a choice of using either Windows or Linux for operating system, since they are already preloaded on the servers we are purchasing. In making our decision, we had to first take a look at the features that each system provided and which one would be the best for what we are doing.
Linux can choose the most suitable Linux-based server system. Those operating system have adequate compatibility with the common hardware. For the example, Ubuntu is listing the suitable hardware for the software they've developed.
Peterson, L. L., & Davie, B. S. (2011). Computer Networks, Fifth Edition: A Systems Approach (The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Networking). Morgan Kaufmann.
In the workplace today there are many different options for operating systems be they providers of server related services or end-user desktops there is a different Linux distribution for many different applications. There are also a number of advantages and disadvantages to adding onto or switching network operating systems within a company. In the following pages I
My boss asked me to come up with a proposal to migrate Windows XP machines to Linux. The company Linx LLC has a new research and development group – LSDG. All systems in LSDG will be running Linux and will access and share resources with Linx LLC. The company has around 500 client operating system desktop/laptops that runs Windows 7 and Windows XP. LSDG needs to decide whether they’re going to keep using both Windows XP and Windows 7 on their desktops and laptops. LSDG must consider the following: costs, longevity of the machines, security, and support. If LSDG decides to keep using Windows XP as their operating system, the company will end up spending more to maintain and configure those machines. I would propose for Linx LLC to have all their machines running Windows XP to update to Red Hate Enterprise Linux Operating System. The last time for Windows XP support was back in 2014. “After 12 years, support for Windows XP ended April 8, 2014. There will be no more security updates or technical support for the Windows XP operating system.” (“Support for Windows,” n.d.) Running only Windows 7 variant on some the machines makes it easier to have updates and especially security patches as well as technical support when needed. Running Windows XP is a major security risk because like I said Windows already stopped supplying patches and updates for this variant. As I suggested, Red Hat Enterprise Linux Operating System will be the best choice to be used by LSDG. The machines
While researching the question posed, and trying to get a better understanding of all the different types of software, I came across many arguments of open vs. proprietary. Many of the arguments that I read, the writers all had good information to support their opinion of which type of software they thought was best. One article that I found interesting was posted on a website (http://www.geekzone.co.nz/foobar/5204), and it proposed that the debate of “Open source vs. Proprietary” be turned around to “Proprietary software vs. Open “. The writer of this article posed the question, “Why is proprietary the default and not open source?” After carefully researching the different types of software, I found myself asking the same question. If you look closely at all of the so called “compelling advantages” that people tend to think proprietary software has over open, you would clearly see that they aren’t all that compelling. One of the arguments raised has to do with support. There is this belief that proprietary software offers better support......is this only because many consumers feel that if they pay top dollar for a product they in turn
When it all comes down to it, Sun Microsystems is one of the most defined and trusted computer manufactures in the globe. This thesis paper discusses the achievements of Sun Microsystems, Inc. Chapter 2 looks into the history of Sun Microsystems. Chapter 3 reviews the choice marketing strategy of Sun and how they have improved their current business position. Chapter 4 examines what products Sun provides consumers in software, storage, desktops, workstations, and microelectronics. Chapter 5 discusses the business code of ethics policy. Chapter 6 explores the legality of Sun Microsystems. Chapters 7 through 11 discuss the international facility of Sun Microsystems in Milan, Italy and chapter 12 explores their global business strategies.
relationship with its franchises and supplier to improve operating system innovatively and last but not least
My boss asked me to come up with a proposal to migrate Windows XP machines to Linux. The company Linx LLC has a new research and development group – LSDG. All systems in LSDG will be running Linux and will access and share resources with Linx LLC. The company has around 500 client operating system desktop/laptops that runs Windows 7 and Windows XP. LSDG needs to decide whether they’re going to keep using both Windows XP and Windows 7 on their desktops and laptops. LSDG must consider the following: costs, longevity of the machines, security, and support. If LSDG decides to keep using Windows XP as their operating system, the company will end up spending more to maintain and configure those machines. I would propose for Linx LLC to have all their machines running Windows XP to update to Red Hate Enterprise Linux Operating System. The last time for Windows XP support was back in 2014. “After 12 years, support for Windows XP ended April 8, 2014. There will be no more security updates or technical support for the Windows XP operating system.” (“Support for Windows,” n.d.) Running only Windows 7 variant on some the machines makes it easier to have updates and especially security patches as well as technical support when needed. Running Windows XP is a major security risk because like I said Windows already stopped supplying patches and updates for this variant. As I suggested, Red Hat Enterprise Linux Operating System will be the best choice to be used by LSDG. The
This lab is extremely important for the real world. A good majority of companies run their server infrastructure on Windows, which means becoming familiar with the technology and services that run on it is just as important as knowing them on Linux. This lab has honed our skills in that regard.
The final selection involves a variety of criteria, such as price/performance, service, and support. Customers generally don't choose UNIX itself, or which UNIX variant they want. UNIX just comes with the package when they buy a system to run their chosen
The differences in the models of Microsoft and Red Hat are very noticeable. The first difference is that Microsoft focuses on keeping their source codes