Not Safe Social Media

In the ophelia project fact sheet 60 % of targets said that their online experiences as a target of cyber bullying affected them at school and at home by causing them intense anger. Cyber bullies are very mean and should be prosecuted. Cyber bullies cause mental and physical harm as well as the message the bully is relaying can be viewed by a much bigger audience and the message will forever be in cyberspace. Even though some people believe that prosecuting cyber bullies violates the 1st amendment, individuals should be prosecuted for cyber bullying because cyber bullies are making threats which violates the 1st amendment.

‘Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me’ (The Christian Recorder). This is the infamous saying that many have heard since they were young. With vastly growing technology today, face to face bullying is being replaced with what is known as ‘cyberbullying’. Cyberbullying is defined as, “an aggressive intentional act carried out by a group or individual using electronic forms of contact repeatedly and over against a victim who cannot easily defend him or herself” (WebMD). It can take place using cell phones, computers, tablets, social media sites, text messaging, and/or chat rooms. Cyberbullying has become a growing awareness nationwide, prompting lawmakers to act and propose new laws making cyberbullying a

Every day millions of people log onto social media platforms. There has been much discussion on whether or not individuals should be prosecuted for statements made on social media platforms. Individuals should be prosecuted for statements made on social media. Although cyberbullying is just a small crime, people should still be punished for harsh or hateful remarks on social media. Having freedom of speech is a privilege not a right, we should focus on the bigger stories on cyberbullying, and individuals affected by cyberbullying are affected in all aspects of their life.

Cyberbullying is an everyday situation for teenagers around the world. Many teenagers suffer from bullies that are treating them badly and differently than other people. Individuals should be prosecuted for statements made on social media because of the impact that it has on the victim. The cyberbully should be prosecuted because of how the victim reacts to the situation, how the bully harrasses them, and how it spreads around the internet.

In closing, individuals should be prosecuted for statements made on social media, no questions asked! This action should be taken because cyberbullying affects teens more than you think and technology has become an essential and vital part of our society, homes, and lives. Imagine if you were the helpless and scared victim of a cyberbullying attack? What would you want done for you to stop the vicious, endless cycle of

The First Amendment has high importance and guarantee coming from our founding fathers. The Constitution promises its citizens that those rights will never be taken away, regardless of what is said. It is too significant to overlook. Cyberbullying also may contain its own positives. Not only would it be seen by powerful and disapproving adults but also influential peers for both the bully and the bullied. It could lead to independent fixing. Although many believe in government consequences, education itself could finish the pressing problem in today’s youth. What, if any, prosecution such as jail led to the termination of the one thing it was meant to stop? So then, why would prosecution for cyberbullying be any

“...1 in 3 teens [have] admitted to being a victim of cyberbullying…” says child psychologist, Eden Foster, in reference to a survey, talked about in “The Dangers of Cyberbullying” by Brett Warke, that shows the absolute significance of cyberbullying in this day and age. Cyberbullying on social media is everywhere and it’s about time that someone took some action against it, and, in this case, taking legal action via prosecution may be the best way to go. Let it not be said that cyberbullying and bullying are different, infact, the only difference is the platform they take place on. Cyberbullying is done with the same malicious intent as face-to-face bullying is done with: the intent to hurt a victim in a psychological or physical way- showing

Technology―it’s the focal point of our lives, from sending a quick text to checking the latest news. But the real debate comes when the conversation switches to cyberbullying, which is customarily described as an act that is “repeated, hostile, and severe with the intent to embarrass, threaten, or harass” (“The Dangers of Cyberbullying” by Warnke, lines 26-27). Bullies in the real world can and do get prosecuted, so what makes this any difference. In some cases, the bullying is so deleterious that the victim commits suicide. If all of this can be prevented, then lives will be saved and children will be able to live without the fear of being bullied. The three sources “The Dangers of Cyberbullying” by Brett Warnke, “Sacrificing the First Amendment

When there is such a rise in social media, people are able to say what they want because they feel safer than they would in person, which can lead to a rise in cyber-bullying.

Not to mention with everyone being connected throughout social media makes it easier for the word to get around faster and make it worse for that person. Cyberbullying might not involve physical abuse and the words said will not make it hurt any less, but the posts someone puts up will be there for anybody to see and might not ever go away. Cyberbullying is no better than bullying because it can still lead to psychological or emotional problems many kids have to face. In some serious cases it can lead to depression or even worse suicide. It can be prevented by social media websites censoring any harsh or mean comments before the posts are even posted. Although it is not their fault, that is how the problem starts and continues.

Furthermore, prosecuting individuals for statements made on the internet would squander taxpayers’ money. As “The Dangers of Cyber bullying” noted, “Congresswoman Linda Sanchez is sponsoring the Megan Meier Cyber Bullying Prevention Act.” Although some may say that financing the court system for the prosecution of “social media bullies” is necessary, it is proven that will also waste money and time. Surely, individuals should not be penalized for statements made on the internet.

People who abuse the privalage to use social media should have some type of punishment

What Li, Seiler and Navarro, and Sevcikova et al. manage to explain is something Olweus failed to do, and that was give the readers some emotion to latch on to. They all gave stories that helped demonstrate what a cyberbully victim could go through. They regarded cyberbullying as the final nail, simply meaning that cyberbullying takes traditional bullying to a new extreme and makes the victim feel even more hopeless. If they aren’t safe at home, they aren’t safe anywhere, and the victims are less likely to get help. “Most victims and bystanders do not report cyberbullying incidents” (Li 166), and “Talking to law-enforcement officials led nowhere: there are few rules governing what can get posted to the internet” (Li 159), help to explain why victims feel so helpless and on their own. Li makes it much easier for the common person to dive into the paper, explaining her findings through common examples and sympathy. Olweus, by using almost no pathos, is much more bland and systematic with his presentation. This reinforces that Olweus’s audience is strictly professional. The audience of Hase et al. varies with each section. It is not as bland and professional as the article Olweus put together, but their article is not as friendly as Li’s. The intended audience of all articles is different, Olweus being professional in the field of psychology, Li being more directed at any educated

Should people be prosecuted for statements made online? People surf the internet almost daily. There are dangers when talking to other people online. When someone says something mean online they consider it “cyber bullying”. Also people think cyber bullying is a common problem in today’s generation. I myself think cyber bullying is when people take petty statements and turn them into something chaotic.

Should cyber bullying be prosecuted? WellI I agree that civilians should be prosecuted for online cyberbullying. Cyberbullying is becoming a common event on online social media in today's world. Recent studies show that 10 to 20 percent experience it regularly. Cyberbullying mainly focuses on the percentage of deaths due to bullying, how you can be protected from online bullying, and how cyber bullying begins in the first place.