Post Secondary Recruitment: A Case Study

Canada contributes nothing to the world of peacekeeping. Canada disgraces its past image by not being a piece of the puzzle to peacekeeping. It is an abnormality that peacekeeping that no longer relates to the Canadian society. The previous statistics as a peacekeeper are drastically different than the current stats. “High of 3,336, started at 850. As of Sept 2014 – 118” (Shepard) Canada’s participation in peacekeeping has changed over the past years from prominent to non-existent. If Canada was once called the peacekeeper now it should be called the nothing-keeper, because Canada is not keeping anything at this point. They started higher than what they are currently. Canada’s contribution is nothing compared to the past as they are a disappointment to their past peacekeeping image. In conclusion Canada no longer has the reputation as a peacekeeper due to its lack of contribution.

Canada’s peacekeeping, the way Canada treats the aboriginal people and Canada’s environment are my bottom three choices that make me proud to be Canadian. I am not highly proud of Canada’s peacekeeping since Canada continues to decrease it. In the past decade, Canada has dismissed an abundant number of requests to join peacekeeping duties thus the UN has stopped asking (Valpy). In 1991, Canada granted more than 10% of all its peacekeeping troops (Valpy). Unfortunately, after 16 years later Canada’s grant is less than 0.1% (Valpy). In fact, there is not even one Canadian officer in the UN’s peacekeeping headquarters (Valpy).Today peacekeepers from other countries have quadruplicated in just a couple of years whereas in Canada they have decreased

Canadians pride themselves on being a “peacekeeping country” and many believe that peacekeeping represents a defining aspect of Canadian identity because it reflects fundamental values, beliefs and interests. Canada has been a leader in peace operations since its development that spearheaded by a Canadian. In fact, Canada’s role as peacekeeper remains the main focus of the Canadian military after its invention around 60 years ago, originally started by a Canadian. Their efforts have gained an international reputation for Canada as a significant contributor to international peace and stability. While Canada has an exemplary history in UN peacekeeping, the current extent of its contribution, both in terms of peacekeeping personnel and percentage of funds to peacekeeping missions, are on a clear decline. The belief that Canada is a peacekeeping country is misguided because recent Canadian commitment shows a sharp decline in Canadian participation in UN peacekeeping. Surprisingly, as of March 2007, Canada ranked 59th out of 114 countries in terms of military and police contributions to UN operations. Despite Canadian declined involvement in peacekeeping during the last decade, it still remains a valuable and important mission that greatly deserves Canadian resources including monetary support, resources and personnel.

Canada has been actively involved with the United Nations since its creation in 1945. Since then, Canadian peacekeepers have participated in almost every single peacekeeping mission. The role of Canadian peacekeeping was to bring peace and stability between countries. However, Canada’s role is slowly starting to diminish because of its failure to prevent conflict in peacekeeping missions. Examples of this instance include the mass genocide in Rwanda, the civil war in Somalia and Yugoslavian crisis.

Finally, Canada helped attempt to rebuild Afghanistan by assisting in the training of Afghanistan’s army and police. “Canada has made training the Afghan army and police forces one of its top priorities in Afghanistan. Despite its obvious challenges, the army remains well ahead of the police in its development. There are currently about 2,4000 Afghan soldiers in Kandahar province, up from 600 in 2006. According to NATO, there are roughly 50,000 ANA soldiers in the country.” (Canada). This quote proves the progress Canada has made in improving Afghanistan’s security. This is important to maintaining world peace because it improves Afghanistan’s security and helps the whole world become stronger in their combined effort to combat terrorism. In conclusion, it was necessary for Canada to go to Afghanistan to maintain world peace by helping to rebuild Afghanistan. They did this through training the country’s defence and security, providing services to the people of Afghanistan, and engaging in operations to clear out

not operating in any personal capacity. Therefore the award is a tribute to the efforts Canada has made since WWII to bring about peace and better international relations.”1 Though his choices were of his own accord, Pearson certainly had a point. At this point in time, Canada dominated the peacekeeping front by such a massive margin that the UN’s peacekeeping force itself, the United Nations Emergency Force newly created at the time, was run by Canadian General E.L.M Burns. Even still, after all of these valiant efforts, Canada initiated more, as in April of 1992, a mission known as Operation Restore Hope was launched in Somalia during yet another civil war. To the chagrin of the government, it was a failed attempt, but the spirit of the endeavour was evident and admirable in itself. Through hard work and determination, Canada showed the world it could be of use in a non violent time.

With Russia’s belligerent attacks along its borders and in Ukraine, mixed with Trump’s presidency, Canada may have to turn towards military resources and diplomatic sources to ensure Canada’s independence. Nonetheless, Canada’s brand of peacekeeping proves to be stable as Canada will commit $450 million and possibly 600 troops for UN peacekeeping missions and in leading a NATO battle group in Latvia intending to hinder Russia’s aggressions. Overall, these actions simply reflect Canada’s morality, but they may come at the cost of its notorious American ally in this time of political

Canada’s involvement in military and peacekeeping operations since the year 1982 has been, while less noticeable than that of former and current world superpowers, still substantial. Canada has taken part in many peacekeeping and military operations including the Gulf War and the war in Afghanistan. As a founding member of both NATO and the UN, Canada has had to find a balance between preserving life and winning wars.

Peacekeeping is a legacy that has been sewn into our country’s core - Canada. Once known for its initiative and determination as open arms of peace but, the true question that we need to ask is “our reputation truly deserved” in modern day. We as Canadians, have truly fallen behind in the values, We used to hold so dear to us. Even though our world is an constant fluctuation of combat and tranquility not all areas of the world are not as fortunate but instead of sending men and women into battles to instil times of peace, we rather our pay checks as a consolation of support in third world countries that suffer from poverty, hunger and watching their future die.

Throughout the world, there has always been conflicts between different nations. One of Canada’s characteristics represents a defining aspect known as peacekeeping, through their beliefs and interests. Peacekeeping has always been a priority for Canadians to control conflict for Canada and other nations around the world. Peacekeeping in Canada began in 1957, when Lester B. Pearson believed that Canada should do something to ensure that nations could agree to have stable truces. Pearson proposed the idea of having an armed peacekeeping force. Peacekeeping is the active maintenance of a truce between nations or communities, especially in international military forces. Canada has significantly impacted peacekeeping, through sending troops on peacekeeping missions and showing how to resolve conflict, getting money and aid through communities to help more nations, and raising awareness on peacekeeping politically.

Canada is one of the best countries to settle in. In fact, according to Fashion and Lifestyle magazine Canada is rated 14 out of 30 best countries to live in (“lifestyle9”). The top three choices that makes individuals proud of Canada are the following: Canada’s peacekeeping, Canada’s health care system, and Canada’s multiculturalism. One can agree that Canadians are proud peace keepers. Peacekeeping started taking place since World War II in the year 1939. Peacekeeping is ranked one due to the fact that it is the biggest pull factors of living in this phenomenal country, because Canada avoids going to war with other countries. This country also supports peacekeeping missions and has participated in tons of missions compare to other 196 countries

Canada’s aid policy has been the subject of significant criticism in recent history (Johnston, 2010). There have recently been exceptions to the criticism, the best known having been Canada’s impressive response to the Haiti earthquake (Johnston, 2010). The Canadian International Development Agency has been the focal point of the criticism, despite the fact that aid is a responsibility amongst numerous government offices (Johnston, 2010). When the Canadian International Development Agency was first developed, it was considered highly innovative and was attracting innovative and talented workers (Johnston, 2010). Now however, the Canadian International Development Agency is considered “bureaucratic, hidebound, out of touch, ineffectual, risk averse, contradictory, vacillating” (Johnston, 2010, 3). Most critics would argue that “nothing less than fundamental cross-government reform of

Increase faculty staff salaries: As discussed earlier, with the fast enrollment of students and expansion within the institution, staff salaries will surely be a priority because you can’t overwork your employees with little pay.

The topic I chose to research and discuss is the topic of recruiting and retaining the best employees. I chose this subject because I felt it was important for an employer trying to compete in this very competitive business environment, no matter what the business is, to be able not only hire the best and most qualified employees but retain them and keep them motivated. The ability to distinguish the difference between high performing employees and lower performing employees can be detrimental to a company’s success or failure. In retrospect, this goes back to recruiting and retaining the best employees while avoiding and being able to let go of those of a weaker caliber. Before an organization can thrive in recruitment and retention,

The case study shows that the company has a very poor recruitment process. The customer service supervisor was not experienced in the interviewing, and hiring. Had the recruitment been well monitored the customer service supervisor would have been required to follow the guidelines to the latter. Following the guidelines specified for the position the supervisor would have conducted much better interviews and selections.