Rachel Nemechek
PSY101
PSY Report 1
Dissecting a Scholarly Research Article
Hypothesis
McGuire and MacDonald (2009) hypothesized that the number of attempts and high scoring on quizzes are positively correlated. They also made the prediction that if an incentive (in this case, extra credit) were to be offered during the first five days that the quiz is available, then there would be more quiz attempts within those first five days. McGuire and MacDonald (2009) also predicted that taking the quiz while extra credit is offered (within the first five days) would produce a larger number of total attempts on the quiz. Additionally, they formed a hypothesis predicting that higher quiz grades would result from taking the quiz while extra credit is
…show more content…
The other four classes were not offered extra credit at all. The six classes that were given the extra credit opportunity were the experimental group, or incentive group. The four classes that were not given the opportunity to receive extra credit were the control group, or no incentive group. The students took the quizzes when they wanted to, in a testing center on campus. Each of the 7 quizzes were available for 10 days except for the third quiz, which was available for 9 days only because of the university’s schedule. Graduate students were present in the testing center at all times to monitor the process and give feedback to students on the quiz they just took. The data in this study was collected through direct, naturalistic observation and the experimental research method. Naturalistic observation occurs when a researcher studies subjects without disturbing them or intervening with the subjects or their environment in any way. The experimental method involves manipulating one variable to see if it has an effect on another variable (Weiten, 2016).
Results
It was found that the more a student attempted a quiz, that higher the student’s grade on the quiz became. There are several reasons that take credit for this. The first reason is that taking a quiz for the first time gives a student a better idea of the material that the quiz covers, so if a student attempts the quiz again he/she will be more prepared. The second reason is
One of the main controversial disputes regarding education is if test taking is actually a beneficial form of a learning technique for students. Within the context of Henry L. Roediger III’s article, How Tests Make Us Smarter, Roediger goes into depth upon how giving students “low-stakes quizzes” could help improve their memory as well as consistent and spread out practice. Psychology In Action, written by both Karen Huffman and Katherine Dowdell, also restates similar learning techniques within their first chapter.
here is for the specter of a quiz to always be hanging over the student where he knows he
There are different factors which affect one’s test score. Someone may get nervous when taking a test, causing him or her to score a lower grade, while on the other hand, someone who feels confident about the test will most likely achieve a higher grade. Also, someone may be better at memorizing, resulting in him or her answering more questions than those who are not capable to memorize things and therefore, not knowing the answers.
Once the student has finished the quiz the program should be able to produce a final score out of ten
The education of students has transitioned from learning crucial lessons to preparing for yearly tests. Meanwhile, differences in students’ comfort of taking such tests and learning styles have affected the scores of students of equal academic merit. The tests also have not helped younger students to accelerate the education process that, theoretically, should result from increased
Howard explains the event in which a new test has been given out to students. The
I believe that this problem can be fixed by making a new grading system with projects replacing quizzes. Not only will this help students understand the material, but it prevents students from memorizing things. If students are required to put together projects and essays, they are encouraged to understand the material so writing or presenting the project is easier. Also, undergraduates are receiving the chance to improve their social skills on group projects and motivate creativity.
The subjects were given mimeographed answer forms that were assumed to match the ones in front of the test takers. The subjects answer forms contained the correct answers so that they could keep track of the test takers scores. There were two tasks consisting of twenty-five questions each. The first consisted of household objects and was female oriented. The second consisted of mechanical objects and was male oriented. There was only one task completed during each experimental session chosen by the experimenter. The instructions given to each subject emphasized that a person’s performance is influenced by factors such as luck, ability, and effort. These factors were told to be kept in mind as well as the tone and hesitation in the test takers voice.
Participants will be assigned into four lab rooms with twenty students in each. First they will be primed randomly with either promotion or prevention focus, by writing a short essay describing how their personal standards had changed as they get matured, and they also need to complete the Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (Higgins et al., 2001) to check the success of the manipulation. Second, they will be given a difficult college-level math problem to solve and hand in within 20 minutes. Third, their answer sheets, which all have a failed feedback regardless of their actual performance, will be returned to them. Forth, they will be given a survey on rating of how enjoyable the math problem was, as well as indicate their choice for the next task to perform: a similar math problem or a different word or logic puzzle task which share the same difficulty. Finally, once the surveys are collected, the experiment is done. Participants are free to quit the task at anytime. If so, the quitted students will also be excluded from the analysis.
It is really good to attend this Scholarly Activity. I always think the nurse way to perform my daily basis. I always believe that I am professional so we can provide excellent service in m way. However, the patients and families can contribute materially to outcome improvements because of their specific knowledge of their illness and the experience of care. They bring in different aspects of care and the spaces that need to be improved. The best things of the value of patient and family voices can increase market share, reimbursement, reputation, and philanthropy. On the other hand, when you listen to patient and family voices, one can decrease error and waste and build a therapeutic relationship with them. It is such a fantastic experience
These studies has the students split into three groups, each one with a task: to come up with ideas for a business in the place of an old restaurant within ten minutes. Two of those groups were also given guidelines, one was told to be polite, the other was told to be politically correct. The third group was left as it was to be a “control” group. At the end of those ten minutes, the groups were “graded” on the amount and novelty of their ideas. The researchers found that the group told to be politically correct had been the group that came up with the most ideas, along with the most
When a student merely reviews the information in a textbook or notes, but doesn’t take the time to test themselves to see if they really understand what they are reading or if they review the test questions while looking at the answers, it can have a negative effect on their test scores. However, if the student were to alter their study patterns they could not only do better on the test, but retain more of the information.
The more time spent on something the better you are. This is the strategy that is being employed in the education system to improve test scores. The latest education reform aimed at closing the gap of test performance has been extended learning time. This reform limits students’ time outside of the classroom and maintains a focus on test preparation. This approach has not been proven to be 100% effective. 42 studies showed no positive impact from year-round school. Every student learns differently, thus the approach should be different for every student.
They were able to control the curricula and everything about the entire learning experience along with conducting small scale complimentary experiments to better understand why the effects observed were happening. The hope was to determine which key skills children should acquire to prepare them for later success. The overarching theme in this experiment was that parents, teachers, and students from preschool to ninth grade were motivated to perform better when they were incentivized. Additionally, when students and teachers were provided with an incentive and threatened with the loss of the incentive, everyone preformed
Testing has felt tremendous influence from the emphasis on efficiency. University examinations have moved from individual testing by professors to nowadays where most exams are machine graded, text-book given multiple choice tests. Thus, with the infiltration of McDonaldization into the educational system, test taking has become extremely efficient for the professor.