preview

Rhetorical Analysis Of Christine Rosen Our Cell Phones Our Selves '

Decent Essays

Salah Ali Jordan Dakin English 10 February 8, 2015 The Rhetorical Analysis of Christine Rosen’s “Our Cell Phones, Our Selves” In the New Atlantis senior editor’s article, “Our Cell Phones, Our Selves,” Christine Rosen illustrates both the positive and the negative issues of cell phone use within the public. In this article she makes it clear that cell phones have become an essential part of our lives and a common asset that is owned by many and most people. Rosen goes to inform us, those who use cell phones or witness others use them, of how cell phone use has changed our behaviors and continues to do so. The author makes a strong case of how cell phones have connected us as individuals but disconnected us socially where she provides an …show more content…

Rosen starts off her article with a quote by Jean Paul Satre that goes “Hell is other people”(Rosen, 457) where she brings about that it is hell being around those who are obsessed with their phones in public. Christine used this quote as a comparison to appeal to the audiences’ emotions, even though Satre may not have had cell phones in mind when had said that. The use of a strong word like “Hell” at the beginning of her article was effective in the way of getting the readers’ attention and also having them think and question what they are reading. She also uses the example of how cell phones can connect you to your loved ones to speak your last words, such as the passengers of the hijacked airplanes on September 11, or to phone someone of your whereabouts, the rescue workers on the …show more content…

All the articles discuss cell phone distraction to some extent. Rosen compared to Schwartz and Seppa seems to have a more neutral stand with cell phones, while Schwartz and Seppa, on the other hand, are writing about distractions where they are focusing mainly on the negative causes of cell phones. Schwartz’s article is mainly about the technological distractions that occur in schools while Seppa’s article is about distraction when driving and multitasking. What I like about the way Rosen wrote her text is that she didn’t focus on whether cell phones are good or bad, dangerous or helpful, useful or useless, but the way that she covers cell phones from different perspectives, how they are good, bad, dangerous, and

Get Access