Root Cause Analysis, Change Theory, FMEA, and Nursing Root Cause Analysis (RCA)

Environmental Factors: The hospital is a very busy place. The background noise can distract the attention of the physicians while they ponder over the right prescription of a drug. The high demand of a medical profession can be stressful and lead to fatigue. These possible occupational hazards can contribute to medical errors.

1. Identify a new activity for the individual. Assess the levels of help the individual would need to participate in the new activity.

The main objective of Beaumont Hospital is to provide high quality, efficient, accessible services, in a caring environment for Southeastern Michigan residents. Beaumont Hospital believes that patient safety is just as important as medical progression. Therefore, Beaumont Hospital’s risk management program consists of identifying hazard associated risks, controlling risks, and monitoring the effectiveness of procedures/practices. Risk is a part of patient care and services because everything doesn’t always go according to plan. Catastrophic patient injuries often occur because of unanticipated failures. The risk management team is responsible of effective surveillance, analysis, and prevention of events which may injure patients, lead to malpractice claims, or cause loss to the health care system. The risk management staff at Beaumont use the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) as a tool to anticipate what might go wrong with a process or product and how that failure effects the patient. FMEA is designed to dissect a particular process into its individual steps, isolate the potential steps that could cause the problem, assign a specific risk level to each abnormal step, analyze the risk potential for the process, and assign and action plan to correct the problem (Fibuch & Ahmed, 2014). The risk management team also evaluates and modifies potential problems. Beaumont Hospital’s risk management team helps avoid or eliminate risks by identifying an alternate

Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is a controlled method used to analyze serious adverse events. Originally developed to analyze industrial accidents, RCA is now commonly organized as an error investigation tool in health care. A principal theory of RCA is to identify fundamental problems that increase the probability of errors while avoiding the trap of focusing on mistakes by individuals. RCA thus uses the systems approach to identify both active errors: errors occurring at the point of interface between humans and a complex system and dormant errors: the hidden problems within health care systems that contribute to adverse events. It is one of the most widely used methods for detecting safety

378). Hospitals have an array of medical devices at the bedside that have alarms, which have grown significantly within recent years. Nurses may be exposed to over 350 physiologic alarm monitors per day, resulting in sensory overload thus leading to desensitization. When the alarm sounds it should be corrected immediately, even though it may be a false alarm or no issues with the patient. The Joint Commission has identified alarm fatigue as a 2014 National Patient Safety Goal, requiring hospitals “to establish improvement of alarm system safety as an organization priority” (as cited in Horkan, 2014, p. 83). Alarms are deliberately designed for high sensitivity so that nurses do not miss a true event. Firing alarms are usually muted, disabled or ignored by nurses altogether because alarms are viewed as a nuisance. Alarm hazards have generated national attention, in one highly publicized case an alarm sounded for 75 minutes before a nurse responded to a patient’s heart monitor that needed a battery replaced. When the nurse finally went to change the battery the patient was found unresponsive and could not be resuscitated because he had gone into cardiac arrest (Sendelbach & Funk, 2013). The patient’s heart monitor battery eventually died and did not issue the critical alarm alert. In another event, a patient fell getting out of bed and bleed to death because the nurse

Several errors and hazards can be identified as possible factors leading to the sentinel event. The ER appeared to be terribly understaffed that day with only one ER physician, one RN, one LPN, and a secretary.

We then look at the errors of hazards that occurred in the Mr. B scenario.  Though we can say understaffing may have contributed to Mr. B’s demise, we cannot blame understaffing. This scenario is regrettably connected to inattentive nursing practice. It is clear that respiratory therapist was in the building and

Causes of major medical errors have many different factors and influences. This includes why the patient was being seen to allow such an error, what medical guideline or guideline’s that where not followed that caused the error, what could have been done by staff members to prevent the error, etc. When errors take place, repercussions follow such as the cost incurred to the patient or patient family members, fines the medical worker must pay, and most importantly what is the patients status/prognosis. Not all patients prevail and make it through such awful medical errors.

A root cause analysis (RCA) is a method by which we can examine a serious adverse event and identify the cause, or causes, that led up to the event. Although personnel are involved in these events, the primary purpose of the RCA is to identify the cause, not to assign blame (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2014). It is through identifying a cause, or causes, of an adverse event that we can improve on patient care processes and thereby patient safety. The RCA is designed as a specific protocol that starts with data collection looking at the sequence of events that led to the

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the unfortunate sentinel event of Mr. B, a sixty-seven-year-old patient presenting with severe left leg pain at the emergency room. A root cause analysis is necessary to investigate the causative factors that led to the sentinel event. The errors or hazards in care in the Mr. B scenario will be identified. Change theory will be utilized to develop an appropriate improvement plan to decrease the likelihood of a reoccurrence of the outcome of the Mr. B scenario. A Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) will be used to project the likelihood that the suggested improvement plan would not fail. Lastly, key roles nurses would play in improving the quality of care

Chosen for root cause analysis is case study number 18, titled “Not for IV Use: The Story of an Enteral Tubing Misconnection” from the book Case Studies in Patient Safety: Foundations for Core Competencies. Root cause analysis is a process whereby error producing system factors are identified and reviewed to assist in the formatting and implementation of solutions to prevent similar errors from reoccurrence (Wachter, 2012). This accounting of the patient’s experience located in the Systems-Based Practice (SBP) section also highlights various code of ethics violations such as autonomy, beneficence, nonmalfeasance, and veracity. The SBP approach in healthcare requires that personnel recognize how patient care connects to the entire health care system and how to utilize successfully system resources to improve both quality and patient safety. There are specific core competencies that assist with this process. Some of which include the ability to work effectively in the delivery-care setting, perform responsibilities according to role, ability, and qualification, advocate for quality patient care and resources, and participate in error identification and solution implementation (Johnson, Haskell, & Branch, 2016). This patient’s story demonstrates an apparent failure of these core competencies.

Discuss how an understanding of nursing-sensitive indicators could assist the nurses in this case in identifying issues that may interfere with patient care.

“A central tenet of Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is to identify underlying problems that increase

This paper seeks to expand upon the 2010 Institute of Medicine’s report on the future of nursing, leading change, advancing health and illustrating its impact on nursing education, practice and leadership. There is an ongoing transformation in the healthcare system necessitated by the need to achieve a patient centered care in the community, public, and primary care settings in contrast to previous times. Nurses occupying vital roles in the healthcare system, need improvements in the areas mentioned above to

4. The patient was not given an adequate opportunity to speak. The worker would not stop talking.