Student Paid Analysis

Paying student athletes has become a growing disputation among college athletes in recent years. College athletes have gained immense popularity among Americans over the past few decades. This has resulted into increased revenues for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and its participating colleges. This often fuels the ongoing debate of whether college athletes should be compensated beyond their athletic scholarships. Because of the amount of income student athletes bring into schools, student athletes should be paid based on the amount of success, revenue, and popularity they bring to the school.

College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes

NCAA participation rates have been rising both in the number of teams and as well as the student athletes competing in college athletics. Women’s sports added 140 new programs and men’s added 111. Along with these added programs, the number of students who participate in the 23 sports sponsored by the NCAA has risen to 472,625 participants. (Johnson) The NCAA revenue for the 2011-2012 school year was $871.6 million and

Furthermore, where should the money come from? Is it the responsibility of the school to pay these athletes or the NCAA? Other questions include how much should students-athletes be paid, how often, will it work in a similar way that professional contracts work, etc.? All these questions reveal how difficult it would be to change the college athletic system to compensate college athletes. Regardless of what number of individuals feels that athletes ought not to be paid for their ability, there is pretty much the same number of individuals whom feel they ought to. There are numerous reasons why individuals think a student athlete ought to be adjusted. Some of those reasons incorporate; individuals feel that frequently the college utilizes these athletes as boards for their school. Additionally, the universities are "offering the athletes' names and achievements for the schools own acknowledgment. “Athletic organizations are utilizing college athletes to offer their items, along these lines the athletes ought to see a portion of the money that is earned. It has even been demonstrated that promoting through understudy athletes extraordinarily impacts more youthful

Most people don’t know that college athletes are already getting paid in different ways than just direct money. "A student athlete at a major conference school on a full scholarship is likely receiving a package of education, room, board, and coaching/training worth between $50,000 and $125,000 per year depending on their sport and whether they attend public or private university"(Dorfman). These athletes get training and coaching for free that professionals pay $2,000-$3,000 per week for. They also receive free schooling if they received scholarships from the school. They can also have free room which means the athletes don’t have to pay for their houses. The average college student pays $20,000 in tuition that these athletes get

Throughout history the big question surrounding the college athletic industry is if college athletes should get paid for the participation in the sport. It has recently over the past few years been brought up as a huge topic in college athletics, a lot of people have their views in if they should or shouldn’t. The big picture everyone has to look at and get an understanding to be the economic aspect of it. There are a lot of factors that people fail to realize that involve paying these athletes such as the supply, demand elasticity, taxes and equity vs efficiency, all of these play a minor role in the impact of the answer people are waiting to get. In my opinion I feel as an athlete myself I feel we should get paid for playing sports. But

When the NCAA was established in March of 1904, both players as well as coaches were not allowed to be paid. Now many years later, once volunteer coaches, are now worth millions dollars and college athletes make nothing. The athletes who bring the most revenue to school, will see none of it because of the strict rules put in place by the NCAA. There are many arguments against paying college athletes such as; there is not enough money or scholarship is enough, but if wanted a way could be found to pay these athletes. The ‘students’ are forced to miss classes for games and practices, which could hurt their grades and may lead to failing the class. Most of the student athletes would

For years now there has been the argument if college athletes should be paid to play or not. It is an ongoing debate among many people, including the National Collegiate Athletic Association(NCAA), athletes, coaches, and other various people. The has debate has gone far enough that a lawsuit has started over it. There are many arguments for college athletes being paid, such as; the athletes do not have time to work, their images are being used without any type of pay, and how the NCAA and coaches make millions of dollars off of the players while the players do not make anything. On the flip side of this, arguments that the athletes should not be paid include; they get paid in other varies ways, the average college athletic department loses

Now granted college student athletes usually have scholarships which covers tuition, housing, fees, and course related books. That’s what a lot of people argue about, when someone says “college students should get paid.” College student athletes don’t have time for a job at all. The schedule of an average college student athlete consists of going to classes, practicing for 2-3 hours, going to a mandatory study hall to do homework or study. These athletes spend up to 44.8 per week on their sports (Hartnell) . It's almost nearly impossible for college athletes to even have time to have a good paying job. Colleges should pay their athletes' in some payment, not saying that they should get $1 million but $2500 wouldn't kill anything. People claim that the NCAA couldn't afford to pay college student athletes, but the NCAA is a multi-billion company. Nevertheless college student athletes need some extra pocket change to help them make things meet, and to help college athletes learn to manage their

A lot of people to this day wonder if student athletes should be paid. This topic has created a lot of controversy among a ton of people. Yes, paying student athletes seems harmless, but if you look beyond the big picture, it could ultimately ruin the NCAA and all college sports for good. UWIRE Text stated, “Getting paid would suggest that college athletes are simply carrying out job responsibilities instead of a recreational activity on game day, which could take away the fun and sanctity of watching the NCAA” (UWIRE Text). Student athletes in college should not be paid to play their respected sports due to the fact that they are already getting paid and that it would make the NCAA organization uneven in the payment of players, the classroom,

Paying collegiate athletes is a very controversial topic that has been talked about since the creation of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) in 1910. People believe that the rules that are in place now for collegiate athletes should remain the same, which classifies college athletes as amateurs, banning them from earning any type of compensation for their athletic ability. Other people think that college athletes should be paid for many reasons, including their dedication, risk of injury, competitive unbalance, and because of the profits, the NCAA makes from athletic events. Student-athletes in college do not get the same opportunities to do certain things as people that are not in any athletic events. Most college students

College athletes are often considered to be some of the luckiest young students in the world. However, there are a lot of problems with how athletes are treated, and one of those problems is college athletes do not get paid. These players should be paid for numerous reasons: the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) makes too much money off of their players and their home school; athletes may get hurt or lose their scholarship, and many do not go professional or have a

Controversy over whether college student-athletes should be paid at the Division I level and here are some of those reasons why they should not be paid. College student-athletes should not be paid because of the countless amounts of resources that are given to them. Student-athletes in college have multiple resources such as athletic training centers, free tutors, and access to the best coaches. Additionally, they have access to the best trainers, training equipment, dietary supervision, physical therapy and recovery methods. Secondly, the NCAA has accepted the principle of increasing scholarship aid to cover the full cost of tuition and initiating attempts to reduce time demands on athletes. This money from the athletic scholarship will essentially

Division I college athletics have come a very long way since its original erection in the late 1800s as only something that occurred at the Ivy Leagues. Today, there is now a side which advocates for paid compensations for college athletes (this is mostly focused in football and basketball). According to the NCAA 's current policy on intercollegiate compensation the athlete first must be considered an amateur. This rule that is in place is extremely redundant because in order for a student to be eligible to be an NCAA student athlete they have to be considered an amateur. This means that, basically as of right now, there is no strongly enforcing rule that is in place to determine whether or not athletes should be paid. The world of college sports has grown rapidly over the past few decades with new television broadcasting contracts, video games, and overall popularity; making it a legitimate broadcasting rival to pro sports leagues such as the NFL or NBA. The reason why college sports have become so popular is due to the increased demand for television games which stems from the excitement of the teams playing. College sports are what they are today because of the players who have become increasingly more exciting to watch. Under normal circumstances, one would be in agreement with the notion of paying a student athlete that is on a team bringing in money from broadcasted and sold out games as a form of compensation. I am on the opposite side of this argument. The

Looking into this controversial issue is a difficult matter. There are so many different aspects related to the payment of college athletes. In researching this matter, one has to first look into the history of this subject such as the evolution of college sports, the issues surrounding scholarships and payment, and the modern industry that has been created by the media and NCAA. Understanding how much a college athlete does is also very important. One must look into how much a student-athlete is actually treated as a student. Second, the money, revenue, and scholarship aid need to be evaluated. The revenue generated, the money paid to coaches and others, and the extensive broadcasting contracts are important when considering if players should be paid. Lastly, in order to come up with some type of system of payment, one must crunch the numbers in order to find a proper way in which to pay these deserving athletes.