The Pros and Cons of Paying College Athletes Essay

College coaches receive sky high salaries while the booster clubs donate millions of dollars to the university 's athletic program, but those who are actually competing do not get paid. As a former athlete, I do not think college athletes should be paid. The NCAA recently ruled that athletes can receive more than just a full tuition scholarship, they can now also get their entire cost of attendance paid for, which includes money for meals and travel. it can be more than the cost of tuition, books, and room and board.

One way college athletes get paid centers around their scholarships. One way the college athlete get paid is because they get free tuition. According to Patterson (2017), “The NCAA says the vast majority of the money it generates goes back to the players in scholarships or some other form.” This is stating that the money the players of a sport make go toward scholarship or tuition. Another reason college athletes don't get paid is because they are on a winning team. According to the article, “Should College Athletes Be Paid?” Tiffany Patterson (2017) “While not all student-athletes are on scholarship, many are, particularly those

Major contenders like Texas, Alabama, or Michigan make millions of dollars off their college athletes. CNNMoney.com reports that The University of Texas football program brings in 68 million dollars profit each year, along with The University of Michigan, which brings in 44 million dollars each year. With revenues like this many sports enthusiasts argue that athletes should receive a cut in the money. Most programs, however, are not making as much as these big programs. The NCAA reports that of bowl-eligible schools, fifty-three schools split $26 million dollars. The NCAA also reports that within those fifty-three schools, eight of the schools lost money.

There are those who are against paying college athletes, they believe that the full scholarship the student-athletes are receiving is all that is needed. The athletes are at school for an education not for sports. According to Johnson and Acquaviva a full scholarship for all four years costs between $30,000 and $200,000 depending on the school(par. 12). Zach Dirlum simplifies it by saying graduating from college with a degree guarantees the athlete making more money out of school(par. 11).As Kerry Brown says in “10 Benefits of Being a Collegiate Student Athlete” a 2013 study by The College Board shows that if the student athletes graduate from college they have a 65% higher

The existence of sports over the past 100 years has always been about support, excitement, and coming together as a team. The real question is, are student athletes actually playing for the “love of the game”? Even though college athletes provide entertainment for sport fans, they should not get paid because of many other privileges they receive. Student athletes are already compensated by the universities’ benefits. Sure, not every student athlete is on a full ride, but they are still receiving educational benefits and living expenses. They do not have to worry about money for textbooks, campus housing, meal plans, student loans and other student required responsibilities. Usually at bigger universities, if student athletes not doing well in that subject, they are required to go into one-on-one tutoring which is also free for them. Even while conditioning, student athletes are offered free professional physical therapy, athletic trainers, and

Right now in sports, there is a huge debate on whether or not college athletes should be paid. For years now college athletes have gone out and performed on national television, working hard to make it to the next level. They have given it there all, and not only that, the athletes bring in about $11 billion in annual revenue from college sports. Now days, sports is a business, and college sports are the same. Division 1 college sports provide a lot of income for the universities. Many athletes receive scholarships and a little more. While the prospect of receiving a free college education is something few would complain about, when the issue is more closely examined it becomes clear that it is not enough. Many people think that college athletes shouldn’t be paid, or already are by scholarships and benefits. College athletes should be paid for participating in college sports to help them financially, give them the money they played hard to earn, and to eliminate under the table payments.

College Athletes are the school .One win or loss will determine what happens to the school. No sport is too small and no sport is too big , In any sport you can be injured and your whole athletic career will be over . Isn’t this enough to get paid ? College Athletes should get paid because they are the heroes of the school.Colleges should pay athletes to play sports because of the revenue garnished by the schools,the hours spent in practice and games are equal to professional jobs and increased exposure.

Although college athletes dedicate a lot of their time to their craft and school work, they still are not professionals and do not deserve to get paid. At top schools, many athletes receive scholarships. But some people think the players deserve a real paycheck, especially since some of the sports they play are million-dollar businesses. “Top college athletes already get plenty of benefits, such as free tuition and meals. Even though some colleges profit from sports, many don't have enough money to pay their athletes.”

Because college athletes are still young, there is no telling how they will act if they are given decent amounts of money. Colin Cowherd is an American sports media personality who has spoken on ESPN Kickoff and Fox Sports Radio and has had many opinions on paying college athletes. “I don’t think paying all college athletes is great; not every college is loaded, and most 19-year-olds (are) gonna spend it—and let’s be honest, they’re gonna spend it on weed and kicks!” (Cowherd). At a young age they would not know how to properly manage their money, and they are at college by themselves, without an adult to guide them with their financial

First, some say that college athletes should be paid because of the fact that the schools and the NCAA make billions. In an article from USA Today, it stated: “NCAA made more than $1 billion for the year” (Mama). On the other hand, they should not be paid because tons of the athletes get scholarships, they are rewarded with a free education, and they are technically getting around twenty-thousand dollars a year. First, in an article from Scholorshipstats.com in statistics from 2015 regarding the amount of scholarship money that was given out was nearly 2.2 billion dollars.

One of the best things about college sports is the player`s energy. The love/passion the players have for the game is unforgettable. There’s some people that don’t think a college player should be getting paid. Some people say paying college athletes would be unnecessary, unfair, as well as unfeasible. Some say college players shouldn’t be paid just so players can keep a clear divide between amateur as well as professional sports. Paying college athletes would create a whole new playing field, the consequences would be

In 2013, postsecondary universities spent $499 billion dollars (“U.S.News”). A great deal of colleges today in America are in debt for the heavy spending they do to make their university the best place to receive an education. College athletes, who receive a scholarship to represent a college in a sport, go to college for free and obtain many benefits normal college students would not get. Paying college athletes would be unfair to students who go through college with debt up to their neck along with not being able to receive sport scholarships. Paying college athletes would put colleges into more debt as well as would start a crisis across America because college sports performers and students would not be treated as equals. The rising opinion that college athletes should be paid can be stifled by aggressive media campaigns, investigations, and strict enforcement of rules.

College athletes should be paid because of the long hours that they put in. According to Mike Gupta,“These athletes also spend at least forty to fifty hours on school to keep their scholarship to play a sport” (Gupta 5). That is a lot more work than just a normal student. These college athletes work way harder and they put a lot more time into school and the sport they play. “These college athletes have to put in around ninety hours a week on schoolwork and their sport they play just to keep the scholarship on” (Gupta 6). They hardly can focus on school because they are all worrying about the sport they play, trying to get better at it. They are practicing and playing in games risking themselves to injuries, and if they do, it could possibly cost

One could feel like paying the college athletes is wrong. One could debate on whether college-student athlete in the U.S. should be paid or not in 2014. One author explains that the college athletes are not considered professional athletes, and therefore should not be given salaries(Mitchell 17). I agree that players are not “abused” just because universities make money from their games. I would suggest that their “four year free ride” is not reasonable compensation for their efforts( ). College athletes need money just like professional athletes. College athletes deserve to be treated like professional athletes.

College athletes should not be paid. “ They argue that the main purpose of going to college is to get a education, not to make money” (“Should college”...1). College is not a job, it is a place to learn. Also many college athletes receive scholarships to attend that school. “The value of the scholarships athletes receive during four years of college can be well over $250,000” (Weiss et al.1). Therefore, athletes