Senate Republicans are pushing for a $1.5 trillion tax cut over the next decade. They claim this tax cut will positively stimulate the U.S. economy and offset the federal deficit with more economic growth. Critics say this will only accelerate the federal deficit. This article says the federal debt passed $20 trillion earlier this month.
Trump believes the wealthiest Americans will end up paying more taxes out of this deal than the middle class. However, Mr. Corker, who is concerned about the federal debt, remains hesitant to throw in his support. “My support will be contingent on a final package that generates significant economic growth and does not worsen, but hopefully improves our fiscal situation,” Mr. Corker said of the tax plan. (Rappeport, & Kaplan, 2017).
…show more content…
If the tax cut proved to be a bust after ten years, then ether some or all the tax legislation may be reversed or expired. Senator Ron Johnson said, “Just going from 2 to 3 percent growth adds about $14 trillion of economic activity over a decade, $2 to $3 trillion of revenue to the federal government,” (Rappeport, & Kaplan, 2017). However, Mr. Wyden said, “It is a prescription for more trouble in the American economy in the long term” (Rappeport, & Kaplan, 2017).
This article is a prime example of politicians trying to affect the economy. To cut or not to cut. That is the question that only time will tell if it
The United States economy is racing ahead at dangerous speeds, and it may be too late to prevent the return of widespread inflation. Ideally the economy should move ahead gradually and grow at a steady manageable rate. Mae West once stated “Too much of a good thing can be wonderful” and it seems the U.S. Treasury Secretary agrees. The Secretary announced that due to our increasing surplus and booming economy, instead of having an outsized tax cut, we should use the surplus to further pay down the national debt. A tax cut, though most Americans would favor it initially, would prove counter productive. Cutting taxes would over stimulate an already raging economy, and enhance the possibilities of an
Heated debates over tax cut have always been one of the central economic themes on the American political table. Since taxes relate directly to the quality of lives, it is by no means surprising to find people showing significant concern about policies regarding cutting or raising the amount they have to pay. The idea that lowering tax rate makes room for growth has remained generally popular among the majority, taking a possible decrease in individuals’ tax burden and increase in productivity into account. There is, however, extensive research conducted on the topic that produced controversial results. Despite its appeal to instant benefits for one’s saving account and investment, reducing tax rate has yet to show a definite positive effect
The Fair Tax Plan is a sales tax proposal to replace the current U.S. income tax structure. It would allow all taxpayers to pay the same amount of tax, whether they are wealthy or poor. The current tax code has over 60,000 pages, which wealthy people can afford to hire someone to find loop holes that will keep them from having to pay taxes; whereas someone poor wouldn’t be able to afford someone to help them find loop holes, causing them to have to pay taxes no matter what. The fair tax plan code is about 132 pages which allows for greater transparency and understanding for both the wealthy and poor, and it would allow everyone to pay the same tax rate on things they buy. Many view this as a negative aspect because sales tax will be increasingly
On October 19, 2017, the Senate approved a budget that would aid Republican efforts to create tax cuts in a vote of 51-49. In essence, this budget would expand the federal deficit by 1.5 trillion dollars over a span of 10 years. According to Republicans, the intent of these tax cuts is to create more jobs as well as providing more income to Americans as a whole. However, many Democrats are starkly opposed to this budget because of how it will increase the federal deficit as well as reducing the potency of federal revenue provided by taxes. With the budget being approved by the Senate, it is now up to the House to adopt its version of the budget to officially make it into law.
President Obama has introduced a variety of fiscal policy changes during his presidency; some of his ideas, however, did little to strengthen the economy as they were intended to do. For example, in 2001, as President Bush had just entered office, he ushered a reduction of income tax rates in addition to other tax cuts for the middle class, through Congress. While these policies were initially quite slow in boosting the economy, the economic benefits eventually began to surface around 2003 and the economy did begin to exhibit stronger growth. However, President Bush’s tax policy was set with an “expiration date”, set by Congress through a budget process called “reconciliation”
Cutting down individual taxes will generate more employment and will help generate more money, it will create more tax revenue, according to Mike DeBones, from “House Passes 2018 Budget, Taking a Crucial Step toward Tax Overhaul.” He states that “Our budget specifically paves the way for pro-growth tax reform that will reduce taxes for middle-class Americans and free up American businesses to grow and hire,” House Budget Committee Chairman Diane Black (R-Tenn.) said during floor debate Wednesday. I agree if the tax is
BBC: For the longest, Republicans have said the U.S. tax system is in need of repairing and Trump is the one taking the stand on it. He’s called for significant tax cuts which
Debt.” 21). In other words, at least one-fifth of tax money did not bring US citizens any benefits. Besides, less capital is available for the federal government to invest in the
every dollar spent in temporary tax cuts, the average benefit to the economy was only 82 cents. Permanent tax cuts yielded even less benefit with a return of only 38 cents on the dollar.
"People say, 'Oh, you're going to get tax cuts up front, but you're going to get tax increases at the end. Don't just look at the end,'" he said. "That's part of the bill. That was their choice to make a lot of middle-income West Virginians pay for tax cuts for the
It may reduce taxes, but it makes the budget smaller for assistance programs. A lot of Americans need those programs and it reduced to make individual taxes smaller. The taxes may be reduced, but if one’s health care or social security is taken away that tax money that was returned will not be able to cover the expenses that social security and health care programs would. If some may say that the assistance programs do not affect them, then maybe the cut on deductions on homeowner will. It may not affect someone individually that bad, but think about America.
The debates on tax cuts are making their way to headlines of every radio station, newspaper, and television station in America. Today, tax cuts would only benefit the wealthy and wouldn’t really benefit the lower class. “The administration and it’s congressional alleys are proposing to sharply reduce taxation of the business income primarily benefiting
When a government’s spending exceeds its revenues causing or deepening a deficit it is called deficit spending. Deficit spending is only one of numerous tools used to help manage the economy. Deficit spending is presumed to stimulate consumer demand by helping the consumer to obtain more money to spend, in turn, the demand of product will rise. There are advantages and disadvantages to deficit spending that we will discuss further below.
This may sound like a tax plan that will relieve the financial burden on lower-income taxpayers, directly benefiting the poor, but in actuality, cutting taxes for all in a regressive manner gives substantially more money to the wealthiest taxpayers and a very small amount to lower income taxpayers. According to his plan, a typical American family of four will be able to keep at least $1, 600 more of
The encouragement of economic disparity because of these tax cuts is bad for America. The US should be aiming for more social and economic equality for everybody. Tax cuts can slow down the economy by putting more money into the wealthy peoples’ hands and giving less to the people who need it.