The first work I studied is the Terracotta Skyphos. It is a cup from early imperial time. It belongs to the Roman culture. It was made at Tarsus in Cilia. It is from Cyprus. The cup is made out of Terracotta, which is a clay-like substance. It is fired clay that can that is durable and strong. It can be molded into any shape. In Italian terracotta means “baked earth.” Making a terracotta sculpture is quick, simple, and cheap. This cup was lead glazed; the shape of the cup represents the Hellenistic period. It’s a fancy work, decorated with plants and flowers. The plants look like it is popping out. It resembles the repousse technique. The cup has a rough texture and the way the light hits it almost looks dark in some areas. On the display it …show more content…
Sculpture is considered the highest form of art in the Roman culture. It also belongs to the Roman culture and the early imperial period. It is a roman copy of the Greek original by Kalamis, which represents the rape of Cassandra. Cassandra in Greek mythology is the prophetic daughter of Piram.In the original it features a woman who appears distressed and her garments slip and reveal her breasts. This work of art symbolized rape. This head was beautiful and focused. The sculpture was the first thing on display in this gallery. The head looked like it belonged to a much larger work of art. It seemed copped off and unbalanced. The curls on the side of the head were deep and accentuated. The curls on top of the head had less grooves, shadows, and depth. The nose was broken off along with the right eyebrow and chin. I could not tell if it was a woman or a man. When you view the artwork from different angles the facial expression is different. It is a simple work of art.
The terracotta Skyphos and the head of Barberini are from the same time period, but very different works of art. The vase is small, delicate and intricate in style. As of the head it is very mundane. These works of art serve different purposes. One is made to drink out of the other is just a statue honoring someone. The materials differ greatly too. Terracotta is durable and made from clay. Marble is versatile and softer. The cup was designed in a way where
…show more content…
Art encourages me to look at the world differently. The statue makes me think of how people were portrayed in the imperial period. The story behind the copy of the original statue of Barberini Suppliant is compelling. It is of a young woman who has been taken advantage of. It is a bold work of art. The original is more detailed and draws more attention then the one I analyzed but both works show and portray different stories. I believe that they made minor changes to the copy but leaving out the body of the woman made it mysterious and hard to analyze. Greek art had a major influence on Roman art and I see elements within these two works. These two works of art emphasized the importance of details. Without details there is a lack of meaning. Without looking at the original work I would not know how to analyze the copy. It looks like a completely different work of art. These two works of art have less in common than I thought. They come from the same time period but they are used and looked at in different
Then there is a sculpture called ‘Kouros/statue of Standing Youth’ which represents the meant back in the day and age. The sculpture is a very young, athletic, toned man. This man has the body every man wants. This sculpture is desirable to every women. This man represents power, and desire. Unlike the sculpture of the woman this man has a face and a very powerful looking
The roman sculpture is quite confusing than the Greek Sculpture which is collected by the lovers of art of the religion they follow which is basically the Rome and they displayed unique picture of roman sculpture on the wall
The sculpture portrays the God of Harvest, Dionysus, with his loyal satyr follower, Pan. A considerable amount of detail when into the carving of Dionysus; the multiple grapevines in his hair, his ceremonial staff Thyrsus, the goatskins and the cup of wine he’s holding are all symbols of Dionysus. The composition is very asymmetrical, and creates a contrapposto arrangement, which is distinctly Grecian (Gardner). It was carved out of beautiful fine marble, which also had another purpose in the way of making this piece of art last for many years. Along with the tree trunk between the two men providing support at the base, and the elongated arms providing more structural stability. The God’s head is even reinforced by his hair to make sure the head doesn’t break off. This sculpture is visually and aesthetically pleasing, but doesn’t serve a useful function, like textiles or furniture. Therefore, it is considered a figurative piece of art, which art that is very clearly modeled after real object or person(s), and is therefore representational
Throughout history people can see many of the developments and differences among cultures, through the artworks that were produced. This essay will carefully analyze, evaluate, and compare four distinct works, from different time periods and cultures. The works to be compared are: The Woman from Willendorf, The Bust of Nefertiti, Figure of A Woman, and Young Flavian Woman. Throughout this paper the style and function of each individual work will be explored, along with the cultural ideas presented in each piece.
When examining the statue, there is an old woman bent and weary. Her posture helps clue us in , with her age and health. The figure is dressed in cloth that hangs off her shoulders. She carries a basket that is filled with what we may think are offerings. Then on her head, there are vines that create a band around the top of her head maybe used to signify the festival that was going on during that time. The specific detail that is seen on this statue persuades us to want to know the story of this woman. Doing so, the process involves lots of research about the time and art. During this period, artist begin to introduce more inner beauty than physical beauty. We get to learn more about the structure itself, then settle for what is given and seen.
Overall, I found the sculpture to represent the generic idea of a Camillus in ancient Rome. The sculpture did a fine job symbolizing how the figures face, short hair, and body would be portrayed as an average human boy. Additionally, I think that most people would portray this figure to be a young boy from ancient Rome, particularly because of his Romanist robe and sandals.
This art includes Mantiklos Apollo, it is one of the masterwork of that time. Mantiklos dedicated the bronze statuette to Apollo and it probably represents the god. The treatment of the body reveals the interest seventh-century BCE Greek artists had in representing human anatomy. Furthermore, there is Orientalizing amphora, it is two handed storage jar. It painted vases, animals such as bear, lions
The Muse or Terpsichore is considered one of the most mysterious and realistic pieces of art in the Carlos Museum on Emory's campus. The Muse is a statue of a woman who is made out of marble. The statue lacks arms which adds to its mystery. Moreover, the marble itself gives the statue a rich and elegant design. As for the usage, the statute was possibly used as a decoration for homes around Greece because the statue is small and portable compared to a human size statue. The statue also has the features of a goddess, which could of indicated that she was possibly used as a protection or luck charm as well. The goddess look comes from the facial expression and the pose, which adds to the statue’s power and leadership. The woman’s face is smooth and soft, which adds to its beauty. Moreover, the powerful features that makes the statue stand out are
(Ancientgreece) As college students it is our duty that we understand this sculpture and what a perfect depiction of Classical art it is. Artist of the Classical period worked hard to represent the anatomy of humans realistically. “It was the first time that
When examining the statue, there is an old woman bent and weary. Her posture helps clue us in, with her age and the state of her health. The figure is dressed in cloth that drapes off her body as she carries a basket that is filled with what we may think are offerings. On her head, there are vines that create a band around the top of her head used to signify the festival that was going on during that time. The specific detail that is seen on this statue persuades us to want to know the story of this woman. Doing so, the process involves lots of research about the time and art. During the hellenistic period, artists begin to introduce more inner beauty than physical beauty. There is an opportunity to learn more about the structure itself, then settle for what is given and seen.
Derived from the Greek word for water, the hydria was a clay jar used for the collection and storage of water during the advanced construction of aqueducts and fountain houses in Athens, rather than wells. Similar to others of its time, our hydria is made with terracotta and black paint. Terracotta, Italian for “baked earth,” is a ceramic (glazed or unglazed) where the body is fired and porous. While not watertight, surface-burnishing and paint or glaze can decrease its porousness and seal the material to become impermeable. The earliest vessels typically have a wide body and broadly rounded shoulder. Our hydria is approximately 17.5 inches tall (to rim) and 16 inches wide (diameter with handles). It has three handles consisting of two different shapes: A large vertical handle on the back for carrying the hydria when empty and for dipping and
These sculptures were created together by sculptors and the ritual specialists. This work of art belongs to the motivated class
From an historical perspective, this piece is an excellent example of early classical Rome. You can sense the respect and admiration that the average Roman citizen had for Augustus, in the fine details of the sculpture.
I was drawn to this time period as well as these two sculptures. As I researched both sculptures I was fascinated by how much respect the people of that time had for their women. Not only for what they could do for them, but also for what they looked like. They didn’t see the weight and size as a grotesque thing; but more as a thing of beauty. In
The relief sculpture, a phenomenal archetype of ceramic art, produced purely through the usage of a human’s most basic machinery, fingers and thumbs, and through the most elemental material - wet earth, has a porous, coarse and rugged texture. Although the artwork does have a degree of heaviness to it, terra-cotta and clay do not have a high density as a result of the material’s porousness. The artwork is in a moderate hue of orange with a slight blend of tan, a pale tone of the color brown, a color typical to artifacts and relics made of clay and earthen materials. The sculpture is an example of a high relief, which is found throughout Hindu artworks, although not as frequently as mid reliefs/ mezzo-rilievo. The use of single material throughout the artwork and the singular color adds unity to the artwork. Although the artwork is not symmetrical it seems that the artwork would have looked solid, settled and balanced if it had not endured damage over time. The majorly similar halves with 2 devas/devis hovering, one at the bottom and one at the top, along with the giant deity right in the middle, seemed to have imparted balance to the artwork.