preview

Terracotta Skyphos

Decent Essays

The first work I studied is the Terracotta Skyphos. It is a cup from early imperial time. It belongs to the Roman culture. It was made at Tarsus in Cilia. It is from Cyprus. The cup is made out of Terracotta, which is a clay-like substance. It is fired clay that can that is durable and strong. It can be molded into any shape. In Italian terracotta means “baked earth.” Making a terracotta sculpture is quick, simple, and cheap. This cup was lead glazed; the shape of the cup represents the Hellenistic period. It’s a fancy work, decorated with plants and flowers. The plants look like it is popping out. It resembles the repousse technique. The cup has a rough texture and the way the light hits it almost looks dark in some areas. On the display it …show more content…

Sculpture is considered the highest form of art in the Roman culture. It also belongs to the Roman culture and the early imperial period. It is a roman copy of the Greek original by Kalamis, which represents the rape of Cassandra. Cassandra in Greek mythology is the prophetic daughter of Piram.In the original it features a woman who appears distressed and her garments slip and reveal her breasts. This work of art symbolized rape. This head was beautiful and focused. The sculpture was the first thing on display in this gallery. The head looked like it belonged to a much larger work of art. It seemed copped off and unbalanced. The curls on the side of the head were deep and accentuated. The curls on top of the head had less grooves, shadows, and depth. The nose was broken off along with the right eyebrow and chin. I could not tell if it was a woman or a man. When you view the artwork from different angles the facial expression is different. It is a simple work of art.
The terracotta Skyphos and the head of Barberini are from the same time period, but very different works of art. The vase is small, delicate and intricate in style. As of the head it is very mundane. These works of art serve different purposes. One is made to drink out of the other is just a statue honoring someone. The materials differ greatly too. Terracotta is durable and made from clay. Marble is versatile and softer. The cup was designed in a way where …show more content…

Art encourages me to look at the world differently. The statue makes me think of how people were portrayed in the imperial period. The story behind the copy of the original statue of Barberini Suppliant is compelling. It is of a young woman who has been taken advantage of. It is a bold work of art. The original is more detailed and draws more attention then the one I analyzed but both works show and portray different stories. I believe that they made minor changes to the copy but leaving out the body of the woman made it mysterious and hard to analyze. Greek art had a major influence on Roman art and I see elements within these two works. These two works of art emphasized the importance of details. Without details there is a lack of meaning. Without looking at the original work I would not know how to analyze the copy. It looks like a completely different work of art. These two works of art have less in common than I thought. They come from the same time period but they are used and looked at in different

Get Access