The Labeling Of Genetically Modified Food Products

In November of 2014, a bill called Proposition 105 was on the ballot in Colorado that, if passed, would require any foods with genetically modified ingredients, to be labeled. Although the bill did not pass, the debate on whether GMOs (genetically modified organisms) should be labeled or not rages on. As defined by dictionary.com, a GMO is defined as “An organism or microorganism whose genetic material has been altered by means of genetic engineering.” This genetic alteration that takes place, is not possible in nature, which has some people apprehensive about GMOs overall safety. Bills like Proposition 105 have already passed in the states of Vermont, Connecticut, and Maine, giving these three states the same rights that 64 countries around

Whether or not to require labeling of GM foods is a major issue in the persistent debate over the risks and benefits of foods crops that are produced using biotechnology. Bills requiring compulsory labeling have been introduced and proposed in different levels, but not evenly implemented. Some of the common genetically engineered crops include soya beans, canola, corn and cotton. The US Food and Drug Administration policy on the labeling of GM food requires labeling is the food has significantly distinct nutritional property (US FDA par 2). Further, labeling is required if the GM food product includes an allergen that consumers may not expect to find in such a product, or if the product contains a toxicant that is beyond acceptable limits (US FDA par 3).

The debate over genetically modified foods continues to haunt producers and consumers alike. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are foods that have been modified through bioengineering to possess certain characteristics. These plants have been modified in the laboratory to enhance traits such as increased resistance to herbicides or increased nutritional content (Whitman, 2000). The debate continues to grow as to whether these genetically altered foodstuffs are the answer to hunger in the coming years, or whether we are simply children playing with something that we do not have the capacity to understand. One of the biggest debates in the GMO issue is whether producers need to use labeling of

Ever since their entrance onto the consumer market in the last two decades of the twentieth century, genetically modified organisms (often referred to as GMOs) have been getting mixed reviews from the public. Genetically modified consumer products (primarily food) have pushed the barriers of some people's comfort levels. Born out of either a lack of knowledge or a sincere concern for public health or the environment, a consumer rights movement has been planted around the world pushing for labeling of genetically modified food products. This movement has matured in many places to a degree where interest groups have successfully lobbied governments into adopting criteria for labeling transgenic food

Sixty four countries around the world have banned the use of GMOs, otherwise known as Genetically Modified Organisms, within farms and supermarkets. However, the United States, a usually technologically advanced country, has yet to invest much time or effort into this endeavour, one that would make food healthier for people and protect the environment. The US government has taken a step back in this effort for healthier food options, as in the country, companies that use GMOs are not required to label their food as such. Some companies and businesses, however, are working to make a change in the case for GMOs in the US, by advocating minimized GMO usage, menu transparency, or the complete ban of the usage.

By the year 2012, over 70 percent of the processed foods in the U.S can be linked to genetically modified organisms, or GMOs. Despite this strong dependency on the manipulation of genetic material, there are many questions concerning long-lasting impacts such food could bring. The government of the United States of America should enforce stricter restrictions on the consumption, production, and availability of food products containing genetically modified organisms. Genetically engineered foods have detrimental impacts on the environment, are linked to large, monopolizing industries, and do not reduce world hunger.

Genetically engineered has foreign genes inserted into their genetic code. In 1973 the idea of a man made DNA or rDNA came from Stanford University from a grad student. Also Professor Herbert Boyer and some of his biologist friends decided to try it. 75 percent of our processed food that U.S. produce contain some genetically modified ingredients. Some of this are crackers, breakfast cereal, and some cooking oils. Mostly everything that contains soy or corn even high fructose corn syrup have at least been genetically modified. Some of the most common type of genetically modified foods are Corn, soy, yellow crookneck squash, zucchini, alfalfa, canola, sugar beets, cotton, and Hawaiian papaya. The food and drug administration regulates labeling of genetically modified food. So some people have concern about not labeling the genetically engineered food. They are concerned because what if a genetic of peanut is inserted into a tomato and a person who is allergic to peanut eats it. Does that make the person eating the tomato also allergic to that tomato would he be able to eat it. Expert say that about 60 to 70 percent of the genetically engineered food that are in the United State grocery shelf. In a survey nearly 9 out of 10 scientist from the American Association for the advance of science say genetically modified food are generally safe to eat. Today they are at least twenty six countries that partially or totally banned genetically modified food. Some of them are China,

You may ask, “what difference could a label on a package make?” If the labeling of genetically modified foods can inform consumers across the country of what exactly they are eating, it can make a huge difference. But the only way to increase these labels is for more federal laws to be passed. Once the new laws are passed, Americans will be more knowledgeable of modern agriculture. When more people buy those genetically modified products, money will come back to the American farmer, and consumers won’t have to spend as much on their trip to the grocery

Do you want to know what you are eating? Have you gotten sick over the past few years and not known why? Many people have gotten sick over the increase of food products with GMOs within them. Over the years many have argued that GMOs aren’t what is causing the increase in death and the decrease in birth, but many say it is the problem. GMOs should be labeled on our foods today because of the amount of health problems, and consumers want to know what they are eating. After all, it is what is going into our bodies.

Although new label regulations, should relieve some fears, by year 2020, most GMOs will have appropriate labeling. There are institutions within the agricultural community that can help resolve the anxiety that oversees the mandatory regulations, which adhere to the reproduction and distribution of GMOs. The Department of Agriculture (DOA), inspects and normalizes safety concerns of growing of crops, whereas the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), lets us know if foods are safe to consume. One of the most controversial institutions is the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The EPA protects the environment. Propaganda or misinformation continues to effect the small farmer, allowing the Big Corporations to slip through the cracks on globally- agreed mandatory regulations, testing, and exporting. These processes are critical, and must have approval, whereas the monitoring and data, is preserved for future reference, clarifying “its main objective is to determine whether the GM crop is “substantially equivalent” to its non-GM varieties and whether it poses an allergen risk” (Norwood, Oltenacu, Lorenzo, & Lancaster, 2015, p.

There are many types of groceries in the local super market. Shopping at the supermarket, mostly every shopper would like to buy foods that are healthy. Of course the first thing that pops into your mind is fruit and vegetables from the fresh produce section. But in the modern day fresh produce are too expensive to some people, so they take the cheaper alternative way to eat healthy. The label of an item catches your eye saying it’s healthy and it’s really cheap, but in reality it’s not healthy at all since it contains genetically modified foods.

Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) are genetic materials; which have been altered through biotechnology. Many crops sold around the world are genetically modified. GMOs undergo changes to fit a specific purpose such as pest-resistant crops. Despite the fact that GMOs are commonly used, there has been many disagreements regarding whether or not they should be labeled. Although GMOs have been deemed safe by the FDA they concluded that labeling GMOs are unnecessary, citizens disagree and suggest GMOs should be labeled because labels provide benefits and also allow people to have positive attitudes regarding GMOs; also not labeling GMOs infringes on an American citizen’s freedom and the labels could start a governmental public campaign

Goldman's essay focuses on the regulations governing genetically modified (GM) foods, and in particular looks at the FDA's standards for GM foods in order to see if the regulations remain relevant and applicable to the current state of GM foods. She concludes by suggesting that for various reasons, the FDA's labeling requirements are not sufficient, because they do not apply to GM foods. Although the essay focuses on food labels more than the controversy surrounding GM foods, Goldman includes a number of useful statistics and insights into the spread of GM foods and their share of the overall market, and the research that went into Goldman's essay provided a good background for this study. Furthermore, her essay implicitly helps make the case that GM foods, though widely discussed, are not considered appropriately because many of those engaging in the discourse surrounding GM foods have outdated, irrelevant, or otherwise unhelpful data.

The addition of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO’s) also commonly known as Genetically Engineered (GE) to our food products have been a heated controversy for some time now. This debate is currently attracting a lot of consumer/media interest in 2014. From the 1990’s on, GE foods have been consumed by millions of Americans and humans across the world. So what exactly are GE foods? DNA (genes) from one species is genetically engineered into certain animals and plants with a specific predicted outcome to be the result. Some types of gene modifications are made to enhance flavor, conserve natural resources, increase nutrients or create

As a company, we feel this is a path in the right direction in food labeling, but this is still not enough. This new food labeling law does not hold the companies up to the highest standard. The food law only requires companies to use a QR code rather than outright labeling it as a GMO food on the packaging. Consumers deserve the right to know what is in their food, as this has been a topic of conversation ever since GMOs were first used in food products. The food industry feels that people deserve to know, but sides with the FDA because the FDA has stated that GMO is closely related genetically to non-GMO and therefore does not need to be labeled (Institute of Food Technology, 2000). Additionally, Consumers all over the world feel they deserve to know what is in their food (Premanandh, 2011). Given these points it is important to label foods as GMO or non-GMO because we want