The Link Between Voluntary Turnover and an Organizations Survival Introduction Strategic human resource management (SHRM) is the study and analysis of human resource (HR) strategies adopted by companies in an attempt to measure the impacts on employee performance. The domain has evolved to encompass particular aspects of HR, such as recruitment and selection, construction of formal HR policies, and refining company practices. Ideally, these features assist to attract, progress, encourage, and retain employees who in return contribute to the effective performance and survival of the organization. In an attempt to achieve this, organizations are adopting strategies to reduce voluntary employee turnover, which is defined as an employee’s decisions to voluntary terminate an employment relationship. Generally regarded as the most significant issue that voluntary turnover poses is the cost to an organization, embedded in hiring and training a replacement worker, training and development programs, and administration setup which not only drains an organizations profit but also expends valuable time and effort. Exploring beyond monetary costs, the implications of high voluntary turnover rates extends to the loss of valuable human capital which effects the motivation and productivity of remaining employees, and shifts the workplace morale. Furthermore, a loss of an employee may prove critical to the organizations reputation from both an insider and outsider perspective. These issues
As the global business environment becomes increasingly competitive, more and more organisations are targeting human resources as a means of strategically gaining competitive advantage. Strategic human resource management (SHRM) is a constantly evolving process which is concerned with providing a strategic framework that supports an organisation’s long term business goals. The logic behind this is that organisations are using new innovative technologies to provide qualitative low- cost solutions, and are trying to manage their human assets more effectively (Wright,
When an employee leaves the company of his or her own volition, it is called voluntary turnover. In this essay, I will discuss why voluntary turnover is a problem for many organisations and how to retain employees.
Some feel their supervisors don’t understand them and some are just on the way to the next highest paying job. No matter the reason, the loss of staff affects the quality and quantity of service we provide to our clients. Turnover increases critical incidents with our clients by putting them in harm’s way by utilizing staff they may not have been properly trained to deal with the client and their particular needs (Wenger, 2011). Furthermore, turnover causes severe staffing shortages and increases overtime costs for additional staff to cover those vacated positions (Wenger, 2011). As an HR professional, I wanted to focus this research on finding the answers to the questions I had around turnover. My research will include the concepts of recruitment and selection in acquiring human resources as well as compensation and training and development and will be used in formulating the strategic recruitment plan.
Nevertheless, these methods cannot predict employees’ turnover. Morrell et al. (2001) discuss about two key concepts: voluntary and involuntary turnover. Voluntary turnover relates to the employee’s decision to leave such as illness or personal reasons. While, involuntary turnover relates to company related problems such as the need to cut costs or to downsize. Even if organisations develop means to identify the characteristics that influence turnover, neither of these two types can be successfully foreseen during the recruitment process. As a result, employers need to secure long term employment since a labour turnover will have a high cost both in terms of recruitment and selection and in terms of training sessions meant to enhance the employees’ soft skills. (Beardwell and Claydon, 2010).
It is difficult to fully calculate the cost of turnover; however, industry experts often quote 25% of the average employee salary as a conservative estimate (Nobscot Corporation, 2016). The direct costs of employee turnover include advertising, recruiting, hiring and training costs. Although there is a significant financial impact to an organization the cost is based only on replacing an individual employee. Turnover can also have indirect costs, such as workplace productivity loss, workflow efficiency and the loss of organizational knowledge. When an employee leaves, they take with them valuable knowledge about the organization, the customers, the current projects and past history, sometimes taking this information to competitors (Nobscot Corporation, 2016). Not retaining the adequate numbers of employees could also lead to over-burdening employees, low employee morale, poor customer service, and more safety concerns (Jones & Gates,
As employee turnover increase, it is the role of the HR manager to keep that from happening, by being more engaged with employers, Richard P. Finnegan introduced this in his book ‘The Rethinking Retention in Good Times and Bad, Breakthrough Ideas for Keeping Your Best Workers’. Mr. Finnegan spoke of the ten principles he believe will decrease the employee turnover, in addition to improving HR and employer’s relationship, he conducted research through surveys, and through experience.
Employee turnover is one of the major concerns in the professional environment. The businesses are in need of employees who can relate with the organizations so their employee turnover rate can be reduced. Human Resources Management (HRM) suggests that managerial procedures are strengthening the relationship between the employees commitment towards organization and make it easy to understand the objectives along with mission. HRM practices and organization execution are the one that directs the employees and determine their intentions for turnover rate.
Workforce turnover is a complex and important issue amongst today's organisations. It is perhaps one of the most often cited cause of increased cost and decreased productivity. No wonder people management has become an important frontier to extract and create more value from company assets. On comprehending the articles, it has become evident that organisations have moved beyond the traditional approach of only investing in core business activities, to invest in employee retention strategies. Many organisations, for example St. George Bank
Employee retention has always been an important focus for human resource managers. Once a company has invested time and money to recruit and train a good employee, it is in their own best interest to retain that employee, to further develop and motivate him so that he continues to provide value to the organization. But, employers must also recognize and tend to what is in the best interest of their employees, if they intend to keep them. When a company overlooks the needs of its employees and focuses only on the needs of the organization, turnover often results. Excessive turnover in an organization is a prime indicator that something is not right in the employee environment. We will look at
Employee Retention: Employees subject to an employer restructuring process may become stressed or distrustful of their employer, its management and their coworkers. Restructuring may cause sudden departures of coworkers and management. Human Resources Management is responsible for convincing remaining employees to stay with the organization. Employee retention efforts may include bonuses, employee training, internal promotion opportunities and improving workplace policies and procedures. Although restructuring resulting from falling profits are unlikely to provide salary increases, such restructuring may provide employees with incentives such as additional time off, flexible work schedules or on-site amenities. Human Resources Management is accountable for researching, recommending and implementing employee retention strategies during restructuring.
(Nair) Employee Retention is a process in which the employees are encouraged to be with the organization for the greatest time until the employee retirement or until the project gets completed. Employee retention is beneficial for both the organization and employee in terms of attaining both personal as well as organizational goals. In this era of globalization employees are blessed with good opportunities. As the competition in the market heats up, it is very difficult for the organization to acquire skills, talent and knowledge. As soon as workers feel dissatisfied with the current employer or with the job, they switch over to the next job. It is becoming hard for the employers to keep employees, and if they are failed to do so then they would be left without enough good employees. Being HR personnel one must know how to attract and retain good workers (Sarin) because these are the employees who can make or break the organization’s goodwill. (Wisnefski, 2008)
It has been already been accepted both in domestic and international markets that employees can be an important source of competitive advantage for corporations (Peteraf, 1993). Therefore, it is critical that corporations adopt Human Resources Management (HRM) policies and practices that utilize the particular employees‟ potential to the fullest (Boxall & Purcell, 2000; Grant, 1996). Thorough recruitment and selection
RETENTION OF EMPLOYEES: Employee retention is one of the most widely researched topics in organizational analysis. Employee retention is a practice or method or whatever organization does to have and retain skilled employees (Dochy et al, 2009) . Retention is considered as all around module of an organization’s human resource strategies. It commences with the recruiting of right people and continues with practicing programs to keep them engaged and committed to the organization (Freyermuth, 2004). Despite various past researches, there is still a lot of confusion about the factors responsible for employee turnover. Among those factors are the external factors( the labor market), institutional factors ( such as physical working conditions, pay, job skill, supervision and so on); employee’s personal characteristics( such as intelligence and aptitude, personal history, sex, interests, age, length of service and so on )( Knowles, 1964)
Within this essay an in depth analysis will be conducted on the difference between Human Resource Management and Strategic Human Resource Management using contemporary perspectives. Human Resource Management (HRM) is the process of managing human resources in a systematic way. It is a practice devised to maximise the performance of employees and is concerned with the application of management principles to manage organisational personnel while paying attention to the policies and systems of the entity (Delaney & Huselid, 1996). Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) is a function of management which entails development of policies, programmes and practices related to human resources, which are aligned with business strategy so as to achieve the strategic objectives of the organisation (Patrick M. Wright, 1992). Its primary purpose is to improve the performance of the business and maintain a culture that encourages innovation and works continuously to gain competitive advantage. In this essay the Resource-Based View, High Performance Management and High Commitment Management perspectives of Strategic Human Resource Management and Traditional and Collaborative