Background
The New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) is the “largest public housing authority in the nation” (Developments, 2015). In existence since 1934 (About NYCHA: NYCHA at 70, 2015), NYCHA is a low to moderate income public housing initiative consisting of 328 developments throughout all five boroughs of New York City. More than 400,000 residents benefit from these developments through the receipt of not only apartments but additional services provided by each development and New York City overall. Over recent years the NYCHA developments have been experiencing a reduction in government funding, forcing the organization to re-evaluate strategies addressing maintenance of old buildings (About NYCHA, 2015).
Introduction
This paper will attempt to analyze the current quality management system NYCHA has in place to determine what the issues are and what other strategies can be put into place to improve NYCHA’s quality management system.
Opportunities
NYCHA as an organization is failing because of the lack of attention and maintenance they provide to their buildings. The quality and reliability of maintenance that NYCHA offers to their residence is horrible. As a government funded organization, NYCHA should be able to handle and properly maintain their buildings. Having a strong quality management process would benefit NYCHA in many ways.
To begin with, quality management is defined as, “the act of overseeing all activities and tasks needed to maintain a desired level
To judge the success or failure of Blumberg Apartments, we must first analyze the project as it works to provide good housing. Good housing should not just be regarded as a noun, it should also encompass housing as a verb. The commodity of the house as a shelter is the noun. This commodity should provide a place for redressing. It should hold the essential necessities that make for a comfortable and complete home. A place that balances privacy and social interactions. As a verb, good housing should be a utility that works to enhance one’s life (Turner, 1972). It should be a stepping stone towards opportunity. For Blumberg Apartments in the grand scheme, both of these facets can be regarded as failures. As the housing projects suffered through massive deterioration, it failed as a commodity. Residents described how their housing had “stairwells that reeked of urine and dirty diapers, constantly breaking appliances and elevators, and the frequent sounds of gunshots” (Colaneri, 2016). Furthermore, units were found to not meet minimum size standards and
During the past few years, gentrification has been on an uprise.“Nearly 20 percent of neighborhoods with lower incomes and home values have experienced gentrification since 2000, compared to only 9 percent during the 1990s.” Gentrification is happening in areas that supposedly need a change, such as the low-income neighborhoods in New York City, Minneapolis, Seattle and Washington, D.C.Factors such as uniqueness, accessibility, the energy of the neighborhood and reasonably priced homes attract gentrifiers. It has altered many cities in the country. Gentrification can be defined as the procedure of reestablishment and remaking due to the flood of prosperous individuals into falling apart and low-income areas that frequently displaces poorer
New Hope Housing likely had strengths related to their employee development program, their effectiveness in housing people in need, and their niche for ensuring individuals who would typically be rejected housing. Some of their weaknesses likely related to their secured funding and current dependence on government funding. Some of their opportunities relate to finding solutions for permanent housing, as this is currently a struggle for the people they serve. Lastly, their threats likely also have to do with their government funding. As budgets change, money is moved around and can impact this organization for the better or for the worse.
With the impact and push from 1949 Housing Act, the Pruitt-Igoe housing development in St. Louis, Missouri and other high-rise public housing of 50s and 60s became the pioneers of urban renewal movement, and most of them have long recognized as a prototype for the failure of public housing and constantly for well-intentioned governmental policies in general. This essay will look back beyond the impression of the collapse, focusing on exploring the temporal, social, economic and legislative issues, which led to the failure and final death of the public housing.
Public and Federal administration insisted that public housing was essential for a successful urban revival program. City leaders asserted that cities needed public housing in order to redevelop the slums and alleviate the post-war housing shortage. New York,
The mission of the Housing Authority of New Orleans is to provide affordable housing opportunities for low-income residents of the city of New Orleans, while laying the foundation for economic sustainability.
Collaborating with tenant associations to initiate building campaigns or other initiatives to address building issues, including repairs and maintenance
It is time to make a change in New York City. Recently the New York Council has passed a proposal where low- cost rental units will be built. This could definitely benefit the neighborhoods who haven’t seen much change in a long time. These people who live in certain neighbors need to be able to
As citizens have been living through the hazards of others over buying their homes or having their homes removed to another area by the government, many people in other communities has struggled to maintain to keep property of homes that they’ll feel comfortable living. Though some believe gentrification ameliorates poverty-stricken neighborhoods, gentrification increases prices of homes and rent and extrude tenants from their homes. Some may argue that gentrification enhance the community by making the neighborhood cleaner and safer however, those who agree with the process of gentrification fail to realize that residents who are living comfortably in their homes are being forced into making unwanted changes. For example, as people homes
Nonprofits have been involved in U.S. housing since the early 20th century when the tenement house was the “labor housing” in urban areas like New York City. At the time, the tenements were controlled by private industry that were concerned about profit rather than the quality of life of their tenants (Bratt, 1998, pp. 139-156). The nonprofit response came in the form of so-called “Model” tenement buildings which like their free-market counterparts quickly devolved into slums (Friedman, 1968, pp. 81-87). After these early failures, it would be nearly fifty years before any significant push by nonprofits in housing.
Housing improvement and affordability policy is an ongoing issue that our nation has battled with since desegregation. Affordable housing provision for low-income communities has been researched extensively in the past by nonprofits in Charlottesville , and The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development( HUD). Locally, the Habitat for Humanity store works to ensure this policy issue is properly addressed through making housing improvements as well as building homes for families in need. The Habitat for Humanity Store has worked to make critical home repairs with sponsorship from Home Depot for veterans (Habitat, 2017). There have been other initiatives to address housing improvement needs also. The Charlottesville Redevelopment
New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) was created in 1934 to plan slum rehab. NYCHA was jointly working with national government to designate areas for public housing development. The theme for public housing was to have less land coverage, certain park and outdoor space, and to break the grid. There were some problems with NYCHA’s plan. The locations of the developments were not ideal. A physical concentration of poverty existed in most of NYCHA’s development areas. Racial segregation and discrimination permeated throughout the area. Furthermore, absence of retail activities made these properties inconvenient for the residents, also resulting in a lack of community atmosphere. (Lecture,
Within years, multiple regulations, laws, plans, and initiatives were created in order to resolve the problem of disrepair in public housing. Next Generation Plan is the next big thing which is supposed to decrease the number of unresolved disrepair cases dramatically. There is also multiple regulations that were created to combat this issue:
Acquiring a house is commonly a standout amongst the most critical speculations an individual or family may experience. Most regularly, homes are financed over periods running from ten to twenty years, yet sometimes this is an abundant time for the respectability of inadequately built homes to weaken. This raises much concern inside state administrative offices that disregard the lacking quality in a large number of homes fabricated every year. Orgs, for example, the Texas Department of Regulation and Licensing and OSHA give strict rules covering a wide range of parts of development so as to guarantee quality and security all through the business. These regulations spread everything from flame
To examine the impact of effective homeowner maintenance dimensions: resident's maintenance awareness, maintenance perceived knowledge, maintenance service priorities, maintenance responsiveness preferences on satisfaction as an indicator of housing provision effectiveness towards achieving the last research objective, Pearson Correlation analysis (r) and coefficient of determination (R2) were performed to investigate the relationship between these variables. Researchers perform correlation analysis to describe the direction and strength of the relationship between variables. Pearson Correlation was chosen because the measure of the variable was ordinal and the relationship between them was linear.