The Nurse Patient Staffing Ratios

The economic impact on healthcare has taken its toll on the number of registered nurses providing bedside care to patients, compromising patient safety and dramatically increasing the potential for negative outcomes. Several factors have immensely contributed to the nursing shortages over the years, including healthcare organizations downsizing, increased workloads, inadequate staffing plans and job dissatisfaction. Mandated nurse-to-patient staffing ratios have been implemented in several states to date with many more trying to pass some type of legislation. Have these ratios affected the quality of care or is it more realistic to create staffing committees that are based on each unit’s unique situation and varying requirements?

Mandatory nurse-patient ratios have been a controversial topic facing nurses for decades. Nurses, patients, physicians, nursing organizations, researchers, hospitals, federal government, and state governments have opposing views in regard to mandatory nurse-patient ratios. Those that support the idea of mandatory nurse-patient ratios believe that there would be an improvement in quality of patient care, decreased nursing shortages, increased job satisfaction, decreased client hospitalization, and increased nurse recruitment (Pamela Tevington, 2012). Groups that oppose mandatory nurse-patient ratios believe that mandatory staffing laws ignore factors such as the level of care a patient requires from a nurse, treatments, length of hospitalization, improvements and differences in technology, the expense of an increased nursing staff, and nurse experience and education (Tevington, 2012).

The purpose of this article is to discuss appropriate nurse staffing and staffing ratios and its impact on patient care. Although the issue is just not about numbers as we discuss staffing we begin to see how complex the issue has become over the years. Many factors can affect appropriate nurse staffing ratios. As we investigate nurse staffing ratios we can see the importance of finding the right mix and number of nurses to provide quality care for patients.

For over a decade researchers have been performing studies examining the effects patient-to-nurse ratios have on adverse outcomes, mortality rates, and failure-to-rescue rates of patients and on job dissatisfaction and burnout experiences of nurses. Aiken, Sloane, Sochalski, and Silber (2002) performed a study which showed that each additional patient per nurse increased patient mortality within 30 days of admission by 7% and increased failure-to-rescue by 7% as well. This same study also showed that each additional patient per nurse resulted in a 23% increase in nurse burnout and a 15% increase in job dissatisfaction. Additionally, Rafferty et al. (2007) performed a study in which the results showed that patients in hospitals with higher patient-to-nurse ratios had a 26% higher mortality rate and nurses were twice as likely to have job dissatisfaction and experience burnout. Blegen, Goode, Spetz, Vaughn, and Park (2011) performed a study where results showed that more staffing hours for nurses resulted in lower rates of congestive heart failure morality, infection, and prolonged hospital stays. The same study also showed that increased nursing care from registered nurses resulted in lower infection and failure to rescue rates and fewer cases of sepsis.

Primarily, it is crucial for health care organizations to focus on ensuring safe and quality patient care, as well as improved job satisfaction by enforcing an optimal and adequate nurse-to-patient ratio and creating innovative and long-term strategies through a collaborative effort. In order to ensure the safety of patients and nurses, state-mandated safe-staffing ratios are necessary. Adequate nurse staffing is key to patient care and nurse retention, while inadequate staffing puts patients at risk and drives nurses from their profession. As baby boomers age and the demand for health care services grows, staffing problems will only intensify. Consequently, safe-staffing ratios have become such an ever-pressing concern. In 2004, California became the first state to implement minimum nurse-to-patient staffing ratios, designed to improve patient care and nurse retention. Subsequent studies show that California’s program measurably improved patient care and nurse retention.

It is not a secret that for many years there has been a detrimental nursing shortage in the United States. Factors that contribute to the unfortunate decrease in availability of nurses and other health care professionals can be attributed to a shortage of nursing school instructors which impacts enrollment into nursing schools, and many in the health care profession are nearing retirement age. The need for health care continues to steadily increase as the baby boomer generation ages. In order to meet these demands, there has to be adequate staff in the workplace. After an extended amount of time dealing with unsafe staff to patient ratio it has come the time to take action and devise solutions rather than letting patient care suffer. After comparing a variety of possible solutions, the most feasible was to create and implement a clear updated set of regulations, and formulate a law to enforce the same. The proposed solution will address the ineffectiveness of current health care staffing regulations, propose a law that will enforce safe staff to patient ratios, mandate that all parties involved in developing health care laws be members of the health care field themselves, and work to maintain a strict continuous reassessment phase to ensure that all changes remain beneficial. With the help of the entire health care community the implementation of this proposed solution will create a dramatic decrease in adverse patient outcomes while increasing patient and staff

Nurse staffing have an effect on a variety of areas within nursing. Quality of care is usually affected. Hospitals with low staffing tend to have higher incidence of poor patient outcomes. Martin, (2015) wrote an article on how insufficient nursing staff increases workload and job dissatisfaction, which in effect decreases total patient care over all. When nurse staffing is inadequate, the ability to practice ethically becomes questionable. Time worked, overtime, and total hours per week have significant effect on errors. When nurses works long hours, the more likely errors will be made. He also argued that inadequate staffing not only affects their patients but also their loved ones, future and current nursing staff, and the hospitals in which they are employed. An unrealistic workload may result in chronic fatigue, poor sleep patterns, and absenteeism thus affecting the patients they take care of.

When someone is hospitalized, they are often in their most vulnerable state. Whether you are the fearful individual being hospitalized, a concerned loved one, or the compassionate care provider, ensuring the patient receives the best possible care throughout their stay is a substantial concern. When receiving care and trusting a facility with the health of the individual involved, wouldn’t it be assumed that the amount of attention and level of care received would be unwavering throughout the nation? Would it be surprising to you to find out that the patient’s outcome may be different depending on in which state they are being cared for? Depending on the state in which the care is being received, there may not be a limit to how many other patients your nurse is assigned to, thus, limiting time and energy that nurse has to spend with each individual. While this fact is a scary one, there is evidence that thousands of lives could be saved if hospitals across the nation would implement change and mandate nurse to patient staffing ratios.

In recent years, the healthcare industry has seen a significant decline in the quality of patient care it provides. This has been the result of reduced staffing levels, overworked nurses, and an extremely high nurse to patient ratio. The importance of nurse staffing in hospital settings is an issue of great controversy. Too much staff results in costs that are too great for the facility to bear, but too little staffing results in patient care that is greatly hindered. Moreover, the shaky economy has led to widespread budget cuts; this, combined with the financial pressures associated with Medicare and private insurance companies have forced facilities to make due with fewer

This study focuses on the issue of nursing staffing and its effects on the outcomes of the patients. To begin with, the tem nursing staffing will be defined and followed by a discussion of nursing staffing in relation to the nurses themselves. Nursing staffing levels and their effects on the patient outcomes will also be discussed with regards to morbidity and mortality besides other indicators of patient outcomes, the impact of nursing staffing levels to quality of care as well as an overview of past studies as far as the relationship between nursing staffing levels and the outcome of the patient is concerned.

AtlantiCare Regional Medical Centre is proud to announce it has made a commitment to raise its current ratio of nurses to patients, exceeding the mandated requirements of the state. Currently, California requires a mandatory 1:5 nurse-to-patient ratio. This law was passed given the evidence that low nurse-to-patient ratios can significantly compromise the quality of patient care. AtlantiCare already meets state requirements, but it has raised its benchmark of care.

Registered Nurse (RN) staffing in the hospital setting has direct correlation to nurse-to-patient ratio which has become an ongoing area of concern when it comes to patient outcomes. According to the Center for Disease and Prevention (CDC, 2015) more than one million RN’s work in hospitals, which makes nursing the largest hospital workforce (p.1). In 60% of U.S. hospitals, vacancy rates for RNs have increased since 1999; 14% of hospitals now report a severe nurse shortage (i.e., >20% of positions vacant) (p. 1). The main priority is the safety of both the patient and the nurse. The rise in patient acuity and shortened hospital stay add to the challenges. According to the cdc.gov, “California is the only state with a law governing minimum

Nurse to patient ratios is an important topic in health care today. The quality of care and safety of patients is a priority that demands constant improvement. The effect that nurse to patient ratios has on these matters has been the focus of many studies. One study found that the risk of patient mortality increases 7% per patient that a nurse is responsible for (Ratios, 2015). This percentage can become dangerously elevated when the nurse to patient ratio is high.

Jayda, state like Minnesota has a union that fights for the right of their nurses. Either one joins the union or not, the union still fights for the nurses as whole. When one work in a state or country where nurses have union, trust me, you will love it. No body, I say no body can underrate or look down on any one of their member. They are the voice for all the nurses, even to the legislative level. They always fight a good fight for their members and the patients. Any member of their union can never be terminated any how without proper and due process. For example, the nurse/patient ratio is very important for safety purpose and they don’t play with it at all.

Nurses are the largest group of regulated health care providers and each one is pivotal in patient care delivery. The nurse patient ratio determines the quality of care and patient outcomes. But inappropriate nurse staffing levels are a serious threat to patients. In the absence of a formal mandated nurse- patient-ratio in Canadian health care facilities, nurses are struggling to give universal care to the Canadian population. The rate of nosocomial infections and hospital readmission will increase when the quality of care is compromised. However, patient outcome is better when a nurse spends more time in providing direct care to her patients, which result in