What Are The Similarities Between Han China And Imperial Rome

Han Dynasty and Roman Empire have many cultural aspects including religious, geographical, and political similarities that can be compared, though many differences are also widespread during this era. Though Roman and Han political structures, both emphasized bureaucracies, they came to them quite differently. Through many amounts of expansion, both societies spread culture and earned money, though expansion was eventually their downfall. Their religions differed greatly, with Rome, emphasizing polytheism and Han China focusing on Confucianism. The differences and similarities between these two civilizations are to be discussed in this essay. One might ask, Which civilization yielded the best

Though they were both able to trade due to their expansions and coasts, Rome did much more trade than Han China. Also, due to this vastness, both societies’ cultures were spread all over the world (which led to other civilizations forming) and their economies were boosted (which led to better conditions for the people).

Most societies that developed in ancient civilizations were centered around some form of imperial administration and Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E.-476 C.E.) and Han China (206 B.C.E.-220 C.E.) were no different in this sense. Both civilizations had a network of cities and roads, with similar technologies that catalyzed cultural amalgamation and upgraded the standard of living, along with comparable organizational structures. Additionally, both civilizations had problems managing their borders and used similar tactics for defense. However, the Chinese Emperor was interpreted as a God while the Roman Emperor was a lugal, or big man, who had to fight not only to gain power, but to push through his initiatives. The similarities and differences

Empires on their outside may seem very different and unique. However, when you get down to their fundamentals, you begin to truly realize how similar they are. Just as the imposing pine tree and humble tomato plant may seem vastly different, their start from a lowly seed and craving for water and sunlight to survive unifies them. Such is also true with the Han and Roman empires. While key differences may be present, their social structures, influencing religions, and causes of collapse unify them.

Rome and Han China had relatively different approaches to land ownership as a means of imperial

Analyze similarities and differences in methods of political control in two of the following empires from 600 BCE to 600 CE (Han China, Mauryan/Gupta India, Imperial Rome).

The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty China were both extremely powerful and widespread empires. They occurred at around the same time and their decline was with two hundred years of each other. The fall of the Roman and Han empires were similar and different because of corrupt politicians, invasions from foreign people, and the aftermath.

Though the Roman empire and Han China were similar in economic basis and technological accomplishments, they were different in social mobility due to China’s isolated geographic location with little access for interaction with other civilizations and Rome’s proximity to nearby empires..

The Han and Roman empire were both built with the hard work of the laborers. The laborers being the common people of the Empire. Both the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire had different outlooks on how the common folk influenced their societies technology. The Romans thought lowly of their common people, thinking they were not as smart as the people in upper class. While in the Han Dynasty the upper class were grateful of the work the people did and knew that the common people was the base of their civilization. All of the documents given to us describes the labor the common people had to do for the uprising of technology during this time period.

These differences are composed of slavery, government testing, the downfall of the empires, and how to endorse the role of emperor. Headmost is slavery. Slavery existed in both Han China and Imperial Rome, but in Rome slavery played a much bigger role in society and government. With in Rome, there were times when the slaves occupied almost 35% of the total population. The slaves here were forced to do much of the farming and hard laboring. In Han China, slaves accounted for less than 1% of the total population. Slaves here were not forced to do anything because they would sign a contract with their boss saying what they can and can’t do. Both the Han and Roman Empire’s people had to be tested if they wanted to be able to participate in the government, but their tests were different. In Han China, people had to pass the Civil Service Exam and In Imperial Rome, it was a necessity to pass the Equities to be in the government. Next, both of these empires had different fates. Han China had corruption within the government and epidemic diseases like smallpox, measles, and possibly even the bubonic plague which killed many people. While these diseases traveled with traders and merchants across the Silk Road they did eventually find its way to Rome too, but that is not what ended the empire. Rome became so big it was too difficult to manage so it had to be split up. After emperor Constantine moved the capital to Byzantium in 312 C.E. the Roman Empire finally came to it’s end in 476 C.E. after many years of decline. Finally, Han China and Imperial Rome had different ways for their people to assume the task of being emperor. In Han China, people were born into being the empire. In more understanding terms, if a someone is born as a boy, and his father was the emperor, he would become the emperor when he became of age. In the Roman Empire however, the

The Roman and Han Empires were among the greatest empires in history. The Han prospered in 202 BCE - 220 C.E and the Roman Empire in 27 BCE- 476 C.E. By the early second century CE, Rome controlled the entire Mediterranean coastline and had to use military force to set up borders against their adversaries, the Huns. During the Han, colonies were established in Korea and military campaigns were mounted in order to control their neighbors, the Xiongnu. Both of these empires had similar rises by using strong military power and expansion, which helped them both strive in economic trade. Although there are many similarities in the reasons that contributed to the rise of these empires, there are also several contrasting reasons for their decline. These two empires differ because Rome allowed plague to end their empire while the Han kept ruling.

I am confused on how the assignment is supposed to be submitted. I'm guessing the group leader submits our discussion or we just post the similarities between the Han Dynasty and Imperial Rome. We are all required to post two similarities and after everyone posts in the discussion, we will pick a couple similarities that best fit. I wanted to know who the group leader is and whether he/she has info on submission details. It would also be nice if we talked a little bit more about the assignment so that we could all meet the requirements and submit the assignment on

The Roman and Chinese Empires both absorbed foreign religions, were centralized, had large populations and had a major impact on the environment. Although, the Chinese were much less culturally diverse than the Roman Empire. After the collapse of both the Han and Roman Empires, the Chinese were able to " reassemble under the Sui" (page 140) but, the Roman Empire was never "successfully reestablished" (page 140). One of the major reasons the Chinese were able to recentralize their government was because of the "cultural homogeneity of Chinese civilization." (page 140)

The several centuries of success for Han China (202 BCE – 220 CE) and the Roman Empire (27 BCE – 476 CE) offer possibilities for comparison in the classical period. The comparison can also help audiences combine more familiar knowledge, about Rome with an appreciation for less familiar classical achievements, as in China. Both empires provided relative peace over wide areas, organized vigorous internal trading networks, and created powerful political systems. Elements of their achievements that would extend to present day principles include Roman law and Chinese principles of bureaucracy that would shape world history. However, the empires were also different, in military and expansionist outlook and in cultural integration, thus affecting the ultimate legacy of each empire. To illustrate how people were involved in the state organization of both ancient China and the Mediterranean, it is necessary to examine physical, political, cultural elements and connections in both societies since these factors affected the people directly and defined the state organization. Elements that involved and directly affected people in both Rome and China’s state organization may be seen in:

This is about Han and Roman Empire. This argument is saying that the Romans were more powerful than the Han Empire based on its military system. This will be coming from the Han's prospective from 206 B.C to 220 B.C. Also talking from the Roman Empire's point of view from14 C.E to 330 C.E. There will be similarities in this paper but mostly differences because these are two totally different cultures. The reason for picking the Romans is because the Han's constantly deployed soldiers year round, even getting soldiers that we not Chinese that lived on the border. Having the advantage of speed and size the Han's had the advantage of taking over all of China. The ability of having these advantages of speed and size gives the Han military of taking over the feudal power structure of other Chinese states.2 But the Roman empire their cavalry would be arranged in columns which will cover more space. The general will also assign his lightened-armed troops which were javelin throwers, bowman, and slingers in the front. If not placed in the front the lightened-armed troops would actually do more damage to the phalanx than the enemy. The heavy-armed troops would be in the back having the ability to shoot and aim high in the air and being able to hit the enemy and not the phalanx.1