A Light of Hope in a World of Darkness Renowned dystopian author, George Orwell, once stated, “It is not possible for any thinking person to live in such a [corrupt] society as our own without wanting to change it." It is true that any democracy favoring individual could identify corruption in their society and strive to refine it. But what would happen to a society when one’s freedom to think and hold an opinion is revoked? How would a society transform if government issued restraints were implemented to lessen an individual's advanced qualities and make them equivalent to everyone else's? In so many works of dystopian literature, societal corruption is blatantly apparent, and becomes the driving force for any freedom seekers’ aspiration …show more content…
These alleged wicked thinking, societal outcasts that desire to better their community, whether that be for themselves or the population as a whole, must possess unique characteristics in order to achieve their goal of rebellion. Although many individuals may attempt to conduct rebellion, some are more victorious than others due to their outstanding characteristics, inspirational qualities and given societal circumstances. In both Ayn Rand’s Anthem and Kurt Vonnegut’s “Harrison Bergeron”, the protagonists both possess the same characteristics of intelligence, determination and leadership that make them yearn to reform their corrupt societies. Though both possess these traits, Ayn Rand’s depicted protagonist Equality is a more inspirational character due to his notable charisma, along with his society’s restrictions being significantly more severe …show more content…
Throughout the story, Equality’s good nature and will to share his discoveries to benefit his society as a whole visibly makes him an influential character. However, when given the opportunity to impact many people by enlightening them of their corrupt society, Harrison portrays selfish tendencies. When Harrison breaks free from his handicaps and delivers a nationwide televised speech, he demands for everyone to acknowledge his superiority by exclaiming, “I am the Emperor! Do you hear? … Everyone must do what I say at once!” (3) Rather than use this opportunity to help his society follow his rebellion and free them from their handicaps, Harrison uses tyranny to broadcast himself as a haughty, snobbish leader. In addition, Harrison continually uses pompous speech by declaring that even though he is “crippled, hobbled [and] sickened”, he is a “greater ruler than any man who ever lived”, and boldly commands his audience to “watch [him] become what [he] can become”(3). Instead of wanting to better his fellow citizens, Harrison simply wants everyone listening to know that he is an exceptional human being. Unlike Harrison, Equality’s main aspiration is to share his momentous discovery of electricity with his community so that everyone would be able to benefit. Equality’s humbleness is apparent when he approaches the World Council of Scholars to reveal his invention
The novel of Anthem, written by Ayn Rand, contributes to controversial subjects in society that are still relevant today. Some issues addressed by Rand in her novel include: equality, social hierarchy, individuality, and government. Throughout the duration of reading Anthem the issues in which Rand makes relevant are not obvious, but more so discussed through conflicts and situations that the main character, Equality 7-2521, encounters. Although many of the altercations that present social issues are provided by either other characters singlehandedly or by a group of the characters in alliance, some of the main issues that arise in this novel are presented within the main character himself.
Anthem, by Ayn Rand, is a very unique novel. It encircles individualism and makes the reader think of how people can conform to society and do as they are told without knowing the consequences and results of their decisions. Also, it teaches the importance of self expression and the freedom that comes along with being your own person and having the power to choose what path to take in life. Figurative language is used often in this book and in a variety of quotes that have great importance to the theme, plot, and conflict of the novel.
Everyone was forced to follow rules and he just wanted everyone to be free. As it explains, “The were equal every which way. Nobody was smarter than anybody else. Nobody was better looking than anybody.” () Harrison did not like that and wanted change. He planned to show what they could really do if they were free he showed it. As it states, “And then, in an explosion of joy and grace, into the air they sprang! Not only were the laws of the land abandoned, but the laws of motion as well. Bergeron did what he wanted to show the people the right way to be living. Harrison Bergeron was a hero to society by showing them the benefits of being free in life. The society they lived in was made to keep everyone equal no one could be better than anyone in any way. Harrison Bergeron tried to be a hero but failed letting anger control his gree. Harrison could also be seen as a hero to guide people to see the good in freedom. Harrison wan a danger to society by misguiding the idea of freedom and showing a sense of fear of a different
In Anthem, Ayn Rand is constantly using characters and emotion to set the mood and tone in the book. In the book, everyone is equal and do not have their own self rights. But of course one character in Anthem does not agree with the rules and goes awol. Throughout the book, characters like Equality 7-2521 become dynamic and learn more about two people in their group of one hundred kids. Every year 100 babies are born because men and women are sent to the City Palace of Mating. Among these two people were International 4-8818 and Liberty 5-3000. Both of these characters causes some of the choices Equality made in the book. Ayn broke down the book with mood and tone into three categories; characters and their feelings, challenges dealing with the setting, and society such as the Council.
The story of Anthem takes place in dystopian future in which freedom and human rights have been obliterated. Equality 7-2521, the protagonist, is a street sweeper who finds a tunnel where he conducts his science experiments which are considered a sin. Throughout the book we see him change and discover how capable he is through a multitude of literary devices. In the novella , Anthem, Ayn Rand utilizes vivid imagery and a profusion of diction to frenetically emphasize the idea of love.
Harrison Bergeron is a valuable story that has underlying themes, which are very relevant in our current society. The theme of equality can be seen throughout the book, and it is the principle that is enshrined in America’s constitution now, whereby they claim that all men are equal. Kurt Vonnegut demonstrates the issue of equality in a Utopian society. Vonnegut in his story, cautions Americans on the dangers of creating a truly equalitarian society, whereby citizens go to an extent of sacrificing their freedom, and individuality to the state, to create a place where all people are equal. Vonnegut creates a society whereby, all people are made equal. The beautiful are forced to wear hideous masks to disfigure their beauty, those considered intelligent are to wear radio calls, and ear splitting noises that are supposed to impede their thinking, and the strong are forced to wear weights around their necks throughout the day. The author uses masks, and the weights as symbols to symbolize
Every day, governments control what people know, what they learn, and what they can do. What if the people in society were punished for believing differently than their government? In the book, “1984” by George Orwell, the government manipulated the people into believing a certain way, the government’s way. If the people challenged the beliefs of the government, they were tortured excessively, then carefully sculpted and shaped into an ally of the government. Their old self no longer existed. In Orwell’s “1984”, society is controlled by the government and people are being altered to fit the government’s idea of a true follower. In our society today, social media has begun to sculpt and shape its followers.
He was thought that it was bad to be different but he did not care, he just wanted to show other citizens that there was more than what meets the eyes. Not only is equality an individualized thinker but he is also smart and brave. Equality makes a statement in his society by creating light and sharing the new invention with others. “We MADE IT. WE CREATED IT. We brought it forth from the night of the ages. We alone. Our hands. Our minds. Ours alone and only. We knew not what we are saying. Our head is reeling. We look upon the light which we have made” ( Rand 59). This shows that Equality made a new invention and is eventually going to show it to the council of scholars. This affects society because the council of scholars thinks that Equality is being superior to his brother. “We have much to say to a wretch who have broken all the laws and who boast of their infamy! How dared you think that your mind held greater wisdom than the minds of your brothers? And if the council had decreed that you should be a street sweeper, how dared you think that you could be of greater use to men than in sweeping the streets?” (Rand 71). This proves that no one, besides Equality wants to change society. This ties to the theme by trying to break out of the controlling society and leading into Equality standing up for individualism and for himself. In addition this concludes how the two short stories “Anthem” and “Harrison Bergeron” have different themes.
When Equality 7-2521 begins the novel by saying, “It is a sin to write this.” he has a different moral assessment of writing than at the end of the novel. Throughout Anthem, Equality’s actions affect how he views his society and the people around him. By the end of the story, Equality begins to realize that the government and society that he lives in might not be so perfect, and it might not be a sin to write. Equality’s eventual moral assessments of his sins are correct and are supported by; his growth throughout the story, the themes of independence developed in the novel and Ayn Rand’s concepts concerning communism. These are the three ideas that will be developed and explained in this paper.
The theme statement i have came up with for both Anthem and “Harrison Bergeron” is, even if you are more intelligent or feel different from others, speaking up about it will only get you into trouble in these societies. A quote from “Harrison Bergeron” that supports my theme statement is “She fired twice, and the emperor and empress were dead before they hit the floor”(Vonnegut,5). The quote from Anthem that best supports my theme statement is “We are one in all and all in one. There are no men but only the great WE, one indivisible and forever”(Rand, 19).
“My happiness is not the means to any end. It is the end. It is its own goal. It is its own purpose” (Rand, 95). Anthem is written by American author Ayn Rand about Equality 7-2521 on his quest for happiness. The novel is set in an unspecified time and place in the future. Years after human civilization has gone through a deconstruction in which all knowledge was lost and a new society established with no concept of the individual. “The novel describes the efforts of the main character, Equality 7-2521, to reestablish a sense of personal identity and restore the knowledge of the past by objective scientific inquiry. In doing so, he must face many dangers and privations” (Anthem). Anthem is a dairy of the Equality
Anthem by Ayn Rand is a science fiction novel about the having the strength and own mind to be a individual. In the beginning it starts off dark and you get the feeling everyone is strange. Equality starts to do things different and rebels against his brothers. He develops feeling for a female or the golden one. Equality learns that there is more to life and he gets his own mind to thank for himself. Rand's novella Anthem observes that it is human native to thrive in a individualists society rather than a collective society where being equal is genocide through the following devices: Mood, Characterization, symbolism, and tone.
Imagine living in a place where all your freedom, rights, and skills were taken away from you. You can't pick important things like your job, your spouse, and your name. You have to wear “handicaps” so you aren't better than anyone else. If you don’t follow the rules, you die. In literature, a lot of societies like this come from the desire for equality. Although many times some equality is a good trait to have in a society, complete equality can lead to a dystopia. Two stories called “Anthem” by Ayn Rand and “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut illustrate how complete equality can lead to no individuality.
Would you rebel for something you believe in, but everyone else does not? Would you die for the cause of something good and helpful to the world? This is exactly what Harrison did. In Chandler Tuttle’ 2081 and Kurt Vonnegut’s “Harrison Bergeron,” Harrison's appearances, beliefs, the equipment used on him, and the responses he receives and produces are important aspects to both medias. Though, the short story and film both have its own unique features that help us connect to his personality. Harrison from “Harrison Bergeron” is a considerate, ignored hero, but also an outsider to the people for his beliefs; since he uses the threatening and self-centered words to express his bitterness and words, many feel he is egocentric, but he has only said this to get his word across, although, in 2081, Harrison is a wise, intellectual, mature, and a Christ-like figure, who appeals to our senses in a better way than Harrison from the short story does explaining why the current system is not effective.
In Anthem by Ayn Rand and "Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut, there are many thematic similarities. Both dystopian stories have a protagonist that is struggling with breaking the laws of equality. In the story “Harrison Bergeron”, Vonnegut states “They were equal every which way. Nobody was smarter than anybody else. Nobody was better looking than