What is Knowledge?

The main argument here is that the knowledge represents for me the basis of my values, from which I learned most things, which in return guided me to the other good values like the honesty, responsibility and accountability. I highly believe that the knowledge is the major source of all other good

Q1A) In what ways does the biological constitution of a living organism determine, influence or limit its sense perception?

Knowledge can be defined as information and skills acquired through experience or education; the theoretical or practical understanding of a subject. Type of knowledge that we refer to as a basic cannot be argued and therefor it cannot be disregarded. For example we know that two plus three equals five and we know that water is boiling at one hundred degrees Celsius .We know these statements to be facts due to we have been provided evidentiary provision through either sensory perception, reason (solving a math problem), or language (being exposed to information from an outside source).When it comes to my quote” That which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow” I completely agree with it, but I will examine it from both sides through use of real life examples in two areas of knowledge.

Information is not knowledge, merely one of the raw materials needed to obtain it. Just as a pile of bricks is not a house -even though bricks are the raw materials necessary to build it- a pile of data is not a doctoral thesis, not even a newspaper article, although information is also the raw material you need to write them.

The topic, “What is knowledge?” can be taken many ways. Knowledge is a justified belief, one that is different opinion. Knowledge is the basis to which beliefs are known, whereas an opinion is a belief which is not known. Unit III A focuses on the etymology of the word knowledge which is defined as the study of epistemology. Philosophy finds its “true beginning” from the study of epistemology. To have knowledge means to find an equal ground between true beliefs and justified beliefs. For the basis of this paper, the three sub topics of the logos knowledge, which are the nature of belief, justification and truth, will be discussed further into detail. These are considered the criteria/rules for the concept of knowledge.

Knowledge is defined to be facts, information, and skills acquired through experience or education. There are two categories that fall under knowledge; personal knowledge and shared knowledge. Shared knowledge refers to what “we know because.” It can also be defined as communicated and constructed knowledge; within culture, social norms, and semiotics. Personal knowledge refers to “I know because.” An expanded definition of personal knowledge refers to personal experiences, values, and perceptions. Shared knowledge changes and evolves over time because of methods that are continuously shared. It is assembled by a group of people. Personal knowledge, on the other hand, depends crucially on the experiences of a particular individual. It is gained

Knowledge can be defined as the “facts, information, and skills acquired by a person through experience or education”1. It is divided into personal knowledge and shared knowledge. Personal knowledge is what every individual knows from its own personal experience while shared knowledge is a collection of several individuals’ personal knowledge. Without personal knowledge there would be no shared knowledge. A clear example where shared knowledge modifies individuals’ personal knowledge through education is religion, where they have authoritative rule books that tell their followers what moral principles to follow. There are several religions that may differ with each others’ beliefs and traditions; some of them may be in favour of an idea while

While knowledge acquisition is important in our life, it is more important to discuss the definition of knowledge. What is knowledge? Is there only one kind of knowledge or many different types? When can somebody be set to have knowledge? Can you now know that this printed page is in front of you or are you hallucinating? These questions need to be asked before looking at the Justified True Belief (JTB) theory.

5. "The historian's task is to understand the past; the human scientist by contrast, is looking to change the future." To what extent is this true in these areas of knowledge?

A part of epistemology is the study of knowledge. The study of knowledge deals with various questions such as: What is considered as knowledge? How is knowledge acquired? What are the limits of knowledge? (Steup, 2014). Knowledge can be acquired in two ways as there are two types of knowledge. One type of knowledge is a posteriori knowledge which is gained through experience. The other type of knowledge is a priori knowledge which is based on reasoning and independent of experience. Through the limits of knowledge, the problem of scepticism arises.

According to to Merriam-Webster's definition knowledge is but the “information, understanding, or the skill that you get from experience or education.” But yet what it really boils down to when we think about knowledge philosophically is can one truly know something. To do this it is important to understand what Justified True Belief is. What Gettier had to say about this and finally what

Today is a time measurement representing the present. This makes me wonder what knowledge exists today? Will it be permanent? To what extent is knowledge temporary? As we have seen in the past, knowledge we have gained previously proves to be wrong over a certain amount of time. If we look back for example people used to believe that the earth was flat. This was predominantly because the technology was not there to research further. So basically a lack of technology hinders us from knowing everything. Can this be applied to us? It is often said that the more you learn the less you know, which conveys much the same problem as the essay. For example myself, when I was younger, I used to believe that colours were just given by nature. But now after some time in Physics lessons, I realised that colours are nothing more than the visual perception from the light reflection depending on its wavelengths. How do we know we can trust the

According to Merriam, knowledge is information, understanding, or skill that one gets from experience or education; it could also be the state of being aware of something. In the colonial days, the lack of knowledge had been known to spark fear and uncertainty among humans. In Europe, people dreaded traveling beyond the sea shore due to the speculations of falling from the Earth because they thought that the Earth was flat. Many people cringed in fear from the thought of exploring new territories due to this unproven fact of a flat world. It took one brave explorer to look past this rumor and see for himself. Proceeding his arrival back to Europe, he proudly said that the Earth did not have a flat dimension, but, in fact, had a round shape which allowed people to eventually return to their destination without traveling the same route. Information such as this was certainly documented for other curious people to read and to challenge. This case led many scientists and other average people to challenge the opinions of the Earth’s spherical shape. Although these ancient scientists worn their intelligence on their foreheads, their reasoning was not supported by proof. Ferdinand Magellan became the first Portuguese explorer to provide evidence of the Earth actually having a spherical shape by circumnavigating the Earth. Just by knowing a particular piece of information provided people with a sense of comfort immediately. Knowledge is most definitely necessary for all aspects of

The fundamental knowledge issue arising from this question is whether knowledge is consistent throughout time. Can we progress through applying knowledge generated decades ago? To determine whether knowledge generated from areas such as history and science can predict the future, it is necessary to know whether the knowledge acquired through these areas of knowing is consistent, irrespective of changes in time and culture, amongst other factors. Through considering this question, we are gaining insight into whether we should uphold our current knowledge beliefs or aim for perpetual progression and uncover new knowledge, potentially aiding us in our development as a species. Old, redundant knowledge may hinder our progression, causing us to

Mouths moving constantly and words being exchanged from one individual to the next. As I sit lost, with English being my first, and only language. I still could not comprehend some of the statements or questions one bit surrounding me and invading my ears. Continuously, everyday watching the mouths of my teachers, classmates, siblings Mother, Father, and Friends. Never had a diagnosis of being illiterate nor any other forms of mental dysfunctional diseases. Possibly they were just speaking the wrong language and their pronunciation was incorrect, not mine. Not to mention, the constant calls to the doctor from my mother and visits informing them about me digging in my ears as a toddler. Along with my kindergarten teacher, Mrs.