What Does Knowledge Mean To You

“Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world” (Mandela). In discussions of education, Newman argues that there should be a common shared knowledge between people. According to statistics, there are 70% of Americans who do not hold a college degree. Newman’s ideas revolve around the belief that everyone should go to college and pursue a higher education. If Newman’s ideas are implemented in today’s society, there will not only be short term difficulties like a greater demand for teachers and supplies but also long term difficulties with America’s economy. Although Newman’s system sounds like it would create a better world in the surface, it would be one which is hard to apply in today’s American society.

What is knowledge?Knowledge is tye gaining of thought,memories,ideas.Knowledge can bring many good qualities ,which are somewhat beneficial ,but what happens when we lust for Knowledge.That is when it becomes a problem because you might create or make sonething you might regret,it can destroy any ethnic or moral value,and it make you look like a crazy person.These qualities lead you and/or other people to death.

I value knowledge, determination and individuality the most. Knowledge brings one closer to the answers they might have in life as well as guide them through tough or significant periods in their life. It helps with choices and gives an understanding to one about those around them or society in general. Determination is key to achieving a goal or succeeding in a desired career path as well as individuality. Setting oneself apart from the rest, allows people to stand out and be known as themselves not as part of a group or class. These qualities identify and help motivate a

Albert Einstein once said “A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. So is a lot.” Knowledge can be good because it makes one successful. Then, it can also be very bad such as a criminal being too smart for the police, he or she can keep committing crime. Too much knowledge is dangerous because it may harm many, which means that many die or get scarred for life because of one simple guy with an excess of knowledge.

I believe, just as Socrates does, that knowledge is virtue. In life you make choices that make you happy

What is true knowledge? Is seeing really believing? Plato gives a great argument as to why our sense-perception of objects is not true knowledge of what we actually see. Also, the Allegory of the Cave comes hand in hand with the Divided Line and breaks down what true knowledge is in which Plato explains that true knowledge is; one, unchangeable and immutable and two, that true knowledge must be about what is real.

A knower may value certain knowledge the most because it is the knowledge which is most valued within his society and culture, although it might not help him be the most he can be. In the Blackfoot pyramid of needs, a Native American tribe, self-actualization is actually the base of the pyramid. In their belief, it is the foundation on which community actualization is built. It means that when a human is already the most he can be then the community in which he lives in or of which he is part of can be the most that they can be. Individual needs are not as important as the needs of the community which means that knowledge about community actualization is more vital or important and therefore of a higher value than knowledge about self-actualization. Their strongest need in Blackfoot society is what Cathy Blackstock describes as “cultural perpetuity” which refers to forming a strong and secure bond with the other members in our society. It is an understanding that one will be forgotten, but one has to ensure that the your culture’s teachings live on. So in their belief system, knowledge which ensure that one culture’s teachings live on is the most important and therefore the most valued. Overall, we can conclude that the most significant factor in determining which knowledge has to be valued the most depends the environment in which a knower lives in and not whether it has been produced with difficulty or

or that death is not the end. There is no way to prove that this is

Knowledge is defined to be facts, information, and skills acquired through experience or education. There are two categories that fall under knowledge; personal knowledge and shared knowledge. Shared knowledge refers to what “we know because.” It can also be defined as communicated and constructed knowledge; within culture, social norms, and semiotics. Personal knowledge refers to “I know because.” An expanded definition of personal knowledge refers to personal experiences, values, and perceptions. Shared knowledge changes and evolves over time because of methods that are continuously shared. It is assembled by a group of people. Personal knowledge, on the other hand, depends crucially on the experiences of a particular individual. It is gained

The basic definition of knowledge, as I see it, is “it can be personal or shared truths which can be justified by areas of knowing, and constructed by ways of knowing”, which is the information, understanding, a skill that we may get from experience and/or education. The application and the removal of personal knowledge influences shared knowledge, making it so that the value of itself is defined by its application and even by the lack of it. Leading to the knowledge question “To what extent is shared knowledge more valuable to the world than personal knowledge?”. How can one define ‘Value’ and is it fair to say that if knowledge is not shared, it is not applied in the world? Valuable to whom? To what? How do we measure value? Who judges value?

Knowledge is defined as facts, information, skills acquired through experience, education and a theoretical or practical understanding of a subject. ("Knowledge."). The essay title discusses whether knowledge is considered meaningful and/or purposeful in our personal lives. Meaning and purpose are defined as two separate things in this statement. Meaning is defined as what is meant by a word, text, concept or action, something that is significant or worthwhile. ("Meaning." ). Purpose on the other hand is defined as the reason for which something is done, created or a consideration. ("Purpose."). The perception of time and overall personality categorizes what we consider to be either knowledge for the sake of knowledge or knowledge with purpose or meaning in our personal lives. This statement raised

Shared knowledge and personal knowledge, although they may come from the same concept of acquiring them through a variety of situations, it differs on the process of gaining them. Thereupon, such approach is seen through human sciences and natural sciences. Human sciences portray shared knowledge through socio-psychological experiments and theories created from personal experiences and circumstances, as well as a set of collective norms and values that change depending on a group of society or culture. On the other hand, natural sciences are made up of theories, formulation of hypothesis and through experiments; which are obtained from paradigm shifts where it involves perception, reasoning, language, and memory. But how does shared knowledge and personal knowledge differ or are similar in both natural and human sciences?

According to Merriam, knowledge is information, understanding, or skill that one gets from experience or education; it could also be the state of being aware of something. In the colonial days, the lack of knowledge had been known to spark fear and uncertainty among humans. In Europe, people dreaded traveling beyond the sea shore due to the speculations of falling from the Earth because they thought that the Earth was flat. Many people cringed in fear from the thought of exploring new territories due to this unproven fact of a flat world. It took one brave explorer to look past this rumor and see for himself. Proceeding his arrival back to Europe, he proudly said that the Earth did not have a flat dimension, but, in fact, had a round shape which allowed people to eventually return to their destination without traveling the same route. Information such as this was certainly documented for other curious people to read and to challenge. This case led many scientists and other average people to challenge the opinions of the Earth’s spherical shape. Although these ancient scientists worn their intelligence on their foreheads, their reasoning was not supported by proof. Ferdinand Magellan became the first Portuguese explorer to provide evidence of the Earth actually having a spherical shape by circumnavigating the Earth. Just by knowing a particular piece of information provided people with a sense of comfort immediately. Knowledge is most definitely necessary for all aspects of

The fundamental knowledge issue arising from this question is whether knowledge is consistent throughout time. Can we progress through applying knowledge generated decades ago? To determine whether knowledge generated from areas such as history and science can predict the future, it is necessary to know whether the knowledge acquired through these areas of knowing is consistent, irrespective of changes in time and culture, amongst other factors. Through considering this question, we are gaining insight into whether we should uphold our current knowledge beliefs or aim for perpetual progression and uncover new knowledge, potentially aiding us in our development as a species. Old, redundant knowledge may hinder our progression, causing us to

ABSTRACT: Understanding the world through the study of knowledge, the investigation of knowledge, more thoroughly known as Epistemology, is the realm of philosophy that studies the sources, nature, limitations, and rationality of knowledge. The most incisive expression of disapproval of naturalistic approaches to epistemology is that they are incapable of effectively dealing with standards and inquiries of justification. Epistemology without such norms, is supposed to be an endeavor not worth achieving. (Stroud,Alemder). What one induces of this is depends on whether epistemology is worth doing at all. Nevertheless, I shall verbally dispute, it is possible to reckon for justification within a naturalistic structure widely interpreted alongside with Quinean lines. In addition to, I shall propose a corrective to Quine’s acclaimed pronouncement that the Humean condition is the human condition.