Winning A One Loss Florida Gators Team Won The Southeastern Conference Title Game

The NCAA has stuck with the current format for the bracket since 2011. There are 68 teams that compete in the NCAA basketball tournament from March to April. 32 of the 68 teams automatically qualify if they win their conference championship. The Ivy does not have a tournament championship so whoever is the regular season champion in the Ivy League has an automatic bid as well. The rest of the 36 slots are filled by at-large-bids and are selected by a committee based on their record and how difficult teams schedules were. This selection is televised on ESPN and is called, “Selection Sunday.” After the committee picks who belong in the tournament, they then need to make the seeding’s for each team. If you are a #1 seed you are considered the best team in that region. If you’re a #16 you are the worst team. There are four separate regions in the tournament and in each region there is a #1 seed through #16. The committee sets up the bracket so the #1 seed has

Many men go to work every single day, making big money for other people, and are the best at what they do in the country, yet they still do not get a chance to get a raise or promotion. The College Football Playoffs (CFP) decides the best college football team in the nation and declares an outright National Champion. The #4 Ohio State Buckeyes were crowned National Champions of the first ever College Football Playoffs and almost did not even get into the playoff. Even though there is a better system in place than the Bowl Championship Series, the CFP has imperfections. The playoff should be expanded to 8 teams to give a better idea of who the best team in the nation is that year, because often times some

9. Should fans of college basketball be concerned about the alleged injustices in the NCAA? Why or why not?

The importance of realizing how much the NCAA makes and none of it goes to the student athletes. College athletes do so much work for the college to make sure that college gets recognitions and sponsors. While the athletes are putting in work for the school, they do not have time to go to work and get paid to pay for food or just anything they need in life. Not all college athletes are on scholarships so while they are paying for school and doing sports they money is really low and can not pay for anything. The NCAA should start realizing what the big problem is and fix it and start taking care of their athletes. If the NCAA won't do something about it, then the college should take it into consideration to take care of their athletes. The NCAA

The big time/more recognized conferences (SEC, Big10, Big 12, Pac12) have big time deals with TV channels which means they have more revenue coming in than the smaller conferences such as the MAC and Sun Belt. It wouldn’t be fair for the smaller conferences because they have less revenue coming in, which means they would have less money to pay their players.

A Team that loses one game during the season is probably out of contention for the National Champion; If it has two losses or more, there is a good chance the team will not qualify to play for national title. Therefore, if a team fails early in the season, then they must win their remain games to have a chance to play for the title.

When it comes to college athletics, there always will be a problem that arises. It is one of the most controversial topics there is. One of the main issues within athletics is the idea of whether to pay college athletes or not. Several studies have been done along with articles from various sources. This has been on the rise especially since “March Madness” is coming up. “March Madness” may only consist of three weekends, however, an 11 billion dollar deal is made to televise the games (Wilbon). This is when you have to take the time to sit back and contemplate whether these college athletes really are getting the fair end of the stick. Under NCAA laws it is forbidden to pay these athletes for their performance yet at the same time they

Reggie Bush was one of the best running backs in college sports. He won the Heisman award and was named Freshman All- American. The University of Southern California, the college Reggie Bush was playing for also won a bowl game. So this big issue comes up about the college paying him to play, and should the NCAA revoke his award. Reggie Bush just told them they could have the Heisman award, and that he did not want it if it would be that big of a deal. Due to the University of Southern California paying

Unmistakably, college football players endure many hardships and make many sacrifices in order to attain the skill set required compete at the highest levels of college football. Only through many hours of focused training can an athlete build the necessary tools to be offered a scholarship by a Division

Regardless of rankings, each of the 64 teams are starting with zero losses. After all is said and done, the Michigan State Spartans looked like the best team in the country by seasons end. However, the truth about the best team will not be known until the final game concludes on April

With the annual debate revived by fans and sportswriters, the involvement of the federal government, and the financial benefit that bowl games offer schools, the issue of wheatear to replace the Bowl Championship Series with a playoff system continues to be one of the most discussed aspects of college football. Most people agree the Bowl Championship Series should be replaced by a playoffs, however there are a few who believe otherwise. The Bowl Championship Series works, and college football has never been more successful, thrilling, popular, or more enjoyable than ever. The Bowl Championship Series is fairer, safer and more effective than a playoffs.

Colleges would have to figure out how much money athletes will receive and how they would come up with the money to pay the athletes. Colleges don’t have as much money to be paying all of the athletes so if athletes were going to be paid, then colleges would have to cut some teams. This is not fair to the athletes that worked so hard throughout their lives to get to a big school. They would not be happy to find their team was cut so a more popular sports team would be paid (NOCERA and WILLIAMS 23). Does that sound fair? The better solution is to not pay athletes to stay out of problems it would cause the college.

According to Smith (2000), in its early years, the NCAA did not venture outside of its role as a rules committee except creating national champions in various sports. Much like today, college

The NCAA has many rules that are disagreeable. Not everyone can agree on every single rule. It just would be impossible to make it for everyone to be happy. One of the most controversial rules is whether collegiate athletes should be paid or not. People disobey this rule and are forced to suffer greatly making the players and colleges upset. Both sides want to make it fair for the both the players and the NCAA. Colleges are usually left out when talking about this question even though they will be greatly affected either way. Allowing this to happen would give players the majority of the advantages. The NCAA would have a few advantages but wouldn't benefit as greatly as the players. This rule won't have major effects on the players or NCAA but will affect the colleges. This debate has been going on for years and has heated up over the past few years.

From the first two national champions, Rutgers and Princeton, to last year’s debateable Auburn national championship winning team, college football has always had difficulties deciding national champions. The BCS National Championship game was thought to give a less prejudice opinion on which teams play in the championship game than humans did. However, it has stimulated more controversy in college sports than Cal-Stanford “The Play.” The problem with the BCS teams is, it chooses two teams that are based on profit, popularity, and record. The BCS is in need of replacement by a playoff system because with a playoff system college football teams have more of an opportunity to show themselves.