Explanation of Solution
Rights of citizens in context to encryption:
The citizens to have the right to encrypt messages in such a manner which prevent the government agencies to monitor, is controversial and must be heard from the perspective of both the citizens as well as the government.
Every citizen has the right to protect their personal information from being monitored by anyone who can cause any harm to the individuals. Citizens also have right to protect their privacy and encrypt their messages to avoid monitoring from the government depends on the government.
The government agencies or government spies monitor the details of the citizens. The reason for the government security officials to monitor the details of citizens is to avoid any external communications and to counter terrorism. But no citizen wants their personal information to be monitored. Everyone has the right to maintain personal information to be safe and maintain the security.
It is controversial whether the citizens have the right to encrypt messages to avoid monitoring and mass online surveillance from the government.
Proper law enforcement:
Answer does not depend on the proper law enforcement...
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 12 Solutions
Computer Science: An Overview (13th Edition) (What's New in Computer Science)
- Is it acceptable, in your opinion, to give up some privacy in exchange for free or almost free software? Is there any way to make them answerable for the data they acquire and how they put it to use? Be ready to defend your stance at all times. There must be proof to back up your claim.arrow_forwardA substantial obstacle is presented by the task of establishing the reliability of information obtained via the Internet. How exactly can one determine whether or not such information is real and trustworthy?arrow_forwardDemonstrate how the ownership of a trademark and the right to free speech may occasionally come into conflict with one another. How is it possible that these assertions, which at first glance seem to be in opposition to one another, may really be agreed upon?arrow_forward
- Is it permissible, in your opinion, to trade a small amount of privacy for free or nearly free software? Is there a method to hold them accountable for the data they collect and how they use it? Always be ready to defend your position. There must be evidence to support your claim.arrow_forwardIs there any danger in treating human rights as though they were only the moral trimmings of technical progress?arrow_forwardIs it feasible to securely produce secret keys on a desktop computer for use in cryptographic protocols using software?arrow_forward
- Is it feasible to produce secret keys for use in cryptographic protocols on a desktop computer using software in such a safe way that they can be utilised, and is it viable to do so on a desktop computer?arrow_forwardIs it feasible to produce safe secret keys on a desktop computer for use in cryptographic protocols using software?arrow_forwardIs there any instance that you disobeyed the right of privacy of others (your family members, classmates, friends, etc.) If so, in what situation or reason. Explain.arrow_forward
- Show how the right to free speech and the ownership of a trademark may sometimes work directly against one another and be in conflict with one another. How can these statements, which at first glance seem to be in direct opposition to one another, be reconciled with one another?arrow_forwardTo what extent does a "Cryptographic Technique" use the "Principle of Confidentiality" to ensure the security of our data?arrow_forwardTwo new computer codes are being developed to prevent unauthorizedaccess to classified information. The first consists of six digits (each chosenfrom 0 to 9); the second consists of three digits (from 0 to 9) followed by twoletters (A to Z, excluding I and O).(i) Which code is better at preventing unauthorized access (defined as breaking the code in one attempt)?(ii) If both codes are implemented, the first followed by the second, what isprobability of gaining access in a single attempt?arrow_forward
- Database System ConceptsComputer ScienceISBN:9780078022159Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. SudarshanPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationStarting Out with Python (4th Edition)Computer ScienceISBN:9780134444321Author:Tony GaddisPublisher:PEARSONDigital Fundamentals (11th Edition)Computer ScienceISBN:9780132737968Author:Thomas L. FloydPublisher:PEARSON
- C How to Program (8th Edition)Computer ScienceISBN:9780133976892Author:Paul J. Deitel, Harvey DeitelPublisher:PEARSONDatabase Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag...Computer ScienceISBN:9781337627900Author:Carlos Coronel, Steven MorrisPublisher:Cengage LearningProgrammable Logic ControllersComputer ScienceISBN:9780073373843Author:Frank D. PetruzellaPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education