LABOR ECONOMICS
8th Edition
ISBN: 9781260004724
Author: BORJAS
Publisher: RENT MCG
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 2, Problem 2P
To determine
Graphically illustrate and identify the features of an indifference curve.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
Suppose your only source of income is work and that you are paid $20 per hour. This determines a budget constraint. You can buy free time at the expense of your income by working less. Likewise, you can get more income at the expense of your free time by working more. Suppose that you can choose how many hours you work.
How do you decide exactly on which point of your budget constraint you will choose? Explain this by referring to your indifference curves.
Moe and Curly both face the same budget line for consumption and leisure. At every possible consumption-leisure bundle on the budget line, Curly always requires marginally more leisure than does Moe in order to be equally happy when asked to forego a dollar of consumption. Using a standard budget line, graph the indifference curves for Moe and Curly that shows the optimal consumption-leisure bundle for both people. Which person optimally chooses more consumption? Which feature of indifference curves guarantees this result?
Suppose Jane spends $48 each month on Oreo cookies with a price of $2 per package, and salt and vinegar chips with a price of $3 per bag. a) With chips on the horizontal axis, draw Jane budget constraint, making sure to indicate the horizontal and vertical intercepts. b) Suppose that at current prices, Jane purchases 6 bags of chips each month. Draw an indifference curve tangent to Jane budget constraint consistent with this choice (assume Jane is maximizing her utility). Label her chosen bundle with the letter A. How many packages of Oreos does Jane buy? c) Suppose that the price of chips falls to $2 per bag, and Jane increases her chip consumption to 8 bags each month. Draw Jane’s new budget constraint and indicate her chosen bundle with an appropriately drawn indifference curve. Label her utility-maximizing bundle with the letter B. (Be sure to determine the right quantities of both chips and Oreos!) d) A major chip producer has experienced a fire, and the disruption of supply has…
Chapter 2 Solutions
LABOR ECONOMICS
Ch. 2 - Prob. 1RQCh. 2 - Prob. 2RQCh. 2 - Prob. 3RQCh. 2 - Prob. 4RQCh. 2 - Prob. 5RQCh. 2 - Prob. 6RQCh. 2 - Prob. 7RQCh. 2 - Prob. 8RQCh. 2 - Prob. 9RQCh. 2 - Prob. 10RQ
Ch. 2 - Prob. 11RQCh. 2 - Prob. 12RQCh. 2 - Prob. 1PCh. 2 - Prob. 2PCh. 2 - Prob. 3PCh. 2 - Prob. 4PCh. 2 - Prob. 5PCh. 2 - Prob. 6PCh. 2 - Prob. 7PCh. 2 - Prob. 8PCh. 2 - Prob. 9PCh. 2 - Prob. 10PCh. 2 - A worker plans to retire at the age of 65, at...Ch. 2 - Prob. 12PCh. 2 - Prob. 13PCh. 2 - Prob. 14PCh. 2 - Prob. 15P
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- A college student has two options for meals: eating at the dining hall for $6 per meal, or eating a Cup O’ Soup for $1.50 per meal. Hisweekly food budget is $60. Draw the budget constraint showing the trade-off between dining hall meals and Cups O’ Soup. Assuming that he spends equal amounts on both goods, draw an indifference curve showing theoptimum choice. Label the optimum as point A.Suppose the price of a Cup O’ Soup now rises to $2. Using your diagram from part (a), show the consequences of this change in price. Assume that our student now spends only 30 percent of his income on dining hall meals. Label the new optimum as point B.arrow_forwardA college student has two options for meals: eating at the dining hall for $6 per meal, or eating a Cup O’ Soup for $1.50 per meal. His weekly food budget is $60. Draw the budget constraint showing the trade-off between dining hall meals and Cups O’ Soup. Assuming that he spends equal amounts on both goods, draw an indifference curve showing the optimum choice. Label the optimum as point A. Suppose the price of a Cup O’ Soup now rises to $2. Using your diagram from part (a), show the consequences of this change in price. Assume that our student now spends only 30 percent of his income on dining hall meals. Label the new optimum as point B. What happened to the quantity of Cups O’ Soup consumed as a result of this price change? What does this result say about the income and substitution effects? Explain.arrow_forwardChuck and Diane are both currently consuming 15 apples and 3 bananas each week, which we can call bundle A. Assume that bananas are the horizontal axis good for both consumers. Let's say both Chuck and Diane consume one more banana each week (4 bananas in total), moving to their respective bundle B on their own indifference curves. In order for Chuck and Diane to remain on the same indifference curve: • Chuck must give up 3 apples, to account for the marginal utility gained from a fourth banana ● Diane must give up 5 apples, to account for the marginal utility gained from a fourth banana Based on the information above, what can we tell about Chuck and Diane's preferences? Diane's indifference curves are flatter than Chuck's indifference curves Chuck and Diane have the same MRS between the bundles with 3 and 4 bananas MRS at The absolute value of the slope of Diane's indifference curves is greater for Diane than Chuck All of the above statements are truearrow_forward
- How does a rational consumer choose his optimal consumption bundle? Graphically show the Indifference curve and the budget line to explain your argument.arrow_forwardJustin Barlow, a careful maximizer of utility, consumes only two goods, Krispy Kreme Doughnuts and coffee. He has just achieved the utility-maximizing solution in his consumption of the two goods when the price of Krispy Kreme Doughnuts falls by 50%. As he adjusts to this event, he will most likely * consume more of both Krispy Kreme Doughnuts and coffee consume less of both Krispy Kreme Doughnuts and coffee consume more Krispy Kreme Doughnuts and less coffee consume less Krispy Kreme Doughnuts and more coffee O consume the same amount of Krispy Kreme and coffeearrow_forwardAmanda consumes three different products: apple (x), orange (y) and banana (z). Her utility function is U=xy^2z^3. The prices of the products: px=20, py=30, pz=40. Her income that she spends for fruits is 3,000. How many apple (x), orange (y), and banana (z) does she buy in case of optimal consumption?arrow_forward
- George has a fixed income and can afford at most 7 units of X if he spends his entire income on X. Alternatively, if he spends all his income on Y, he can afford at most 6 units of Y. Draw George's budget line and an indifference curve such that George chooses to buy 4 pieces of X. Martha has the same income and faces the same prices, yet she chooses to buy 2 pieces of X. In equilibrium, what is George's subjective value of X in terms of Y? What is Martha's? Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forwardA student living in a university hostel has two options for meals: eating at the dining hall for Rs.600 per meal, or eating a meal at Dhaaba for Rs.150 per meal. His weekly food budget is Rs.6000. Draw the budget constraint showing the trade-off between dining-hall meals and meals at Dhaaba. Assuming that he spends equal amounts on both goods, draw an indifference curve showing the optimum choice. Label the optimum as point A. Suppose the price of a Dhaaba meal now rises to Rs.200. Using your diagram from part (a), show the consequences of this change in price. Assume that our student now spends only 30 percent of his income on dining-hall meals. Label the new optimum as point B. What happened to the quantity of meals at Dhaaba consumed as a result of this price change? What does this result say about the income and substitution effects? Explain. Use points A and B to draw a demand curve for meals at Dhaaba. What is this type of good called?arrow_forwardDraw a budget constraint for an individual where if all income is dedicated to consumption of good X, the consumer can consume 40 units, and similarly, if the consumer dedicates all income to good Y 40 units can be consumed. What is the slope of the budget constraint? Draw in an indifference curve for this consumer showing an initial consumer equilibrium, with consumption of X and Y labelled. Now suppose that the price of good X falls such that 80 units of X could be purchased if the consumer dedicates all income to good X. What is the price ratio and slope of the new budget constraint? Draw in a new indifference curve tangent to the new budget constraint, together with consumption of X and Y. Identify the income and substitution effects graphically.arrow_forward
- A consumer with income I=120 facing prices pX = 4 and pY = 8 for two goods X and Y (for each good she prefers more to less) chooses optimally to consume 12 units of X. If the prices change and now pX = 6 and pY = 4, what is the possible range for her optimal X consumption? (like, x >/ 7 or 10 >/ x >/7…etc. Use indifference curve analysis on a graph to reason about the possible locations of the new optimal bundle.)arrow_forwardPaolo enjoys consuming both soda and coffee. Each can of soda costs Ps = $1, and each cup of coffee costs Pc = $2. Suppose that Paolo buys 75 cans of soda and 50 cups of coffee per month. The following graphs show his marginal utility curves for soda and coffee. At his current consumption level, Paolo's marginal utility from consuming the last can of soda he bought is MUS = 12 utils per can, and his marginal utility from consuming the last cup of coffee he bought is MUC = 12 utils per cup. 24 20 20 16 25 50 75 100 125 150 25 50 75 100 125 150 SODA (Cans) COFFEE (Cups) Is Paolo currently maximizing his utility? O No; he likes coffee and soda more than other goods, so he should buy more of both. O No; he could buy less soda and more coffee, not spend any more money, and be better off. O Yes; the marginal utility he receives from his last can of soda equals that of his last cup of coffee. O No; he could buy more soda and less coffee, not spend any more money, and be better off. MU OF SODA…arrow_forwardConsider an indifference curve for someone deciding how to allocate time between work (and thus consumption) and leisure. Suppose the wage increases. The substitution effect induces a person to work and consume (more , less) ? in response to higher wages. If consumption is a normal good, the income effect induces the person to consume ( more, less) ? when the wage rises, but if consumption is an inferior good, the income effect induces the person to consume ( more , less) ? in response to higher wages. True or False: The person's consumption may fall as a result of the higher wage if consumption is an inferior good. True or Falsearrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you